Jon Krakauer's Into Thin Air

699 Words2 Pages

Everest has always been known as deadly. An unchallenged king, towering over the world. So it's almost certain that someone would one day challenge it. “Into Thin Air” is a story about a group who decides to climb Mt. Everest. One of those climbers is a man named Jon Krakauer, it is his view that the story is told from. Climbing Everest is indeed an irrational act, your family, physical health, and mental health would be better off if you stayed on the ground. The following will support my three reasons and hopefully make the right decision clear.

Family is one of the most important things everyone has in common. Your family are people who are willing to except you for who you are. People who are willing to fight for you, and who care about …show more content…

They do it for the experience. They do it for bragging rights and the ability to say “I did that!”. I fully understand this, and can see why they would want that. Everyone likes bragging rights, or the “I told you so” kind of thing. I'm sure some of them do it for charity or to give kids hope. But I'm talking about the majority, I bet the majority of them want to feel a rush. Which is not a bad thing, but it also has its limits. Where should you draw the line? I say, draw that line at the bottom of …show more content…

Everest isn't only a great physical challenge, it's also mental. You have to push yourself constantly, willing yourself to keep going. It wouldn't be long before mental exhaustion takes place. On summit pushes, climbers are expected to burn 13,000-15,000 calories. That's around seven times the daily intake value. With that much of a calorie deficit, your brain won't be able to function properly. This could lead to you thinking irrationally, causing you to injure yourself and/or others. Panic and fear are also very real, and very dangerous. If you panic at 27,000 feet you will be putting your life at risk for something you think is rational. When in reality, it's

Open Document