Mount Everest Risks

1677 Words4 Pages

With violent storms and unpredictable avalanches, there’s no doubt that Mount Everest is dangerous for all who attempt to climb it. Various factors play into determining how great of a risk the journey to the summit is, including experience and amount of time on Everest. In recent years, the experience level of the climbers has dropped severely. Due to an increasing number of inexperienced climbers crowding Mount Everest’s slope, endangering themselves and fellow climbers, the governments of Tibet and Nepal, as well as private guiding businesses, should distribute permits to only those who meet specific health and experience qualifications.

Mount Everest contains many dangers, making the climb extremely hazardous even for the most experienced …show more content…

Lowering the number of people allowed onto the mountain at any given point makes the trip to the summit and back shorter. Less time on the mountain reduces the risk for injuries resulting in exposure to cold or high altitude, as well as decreasing the chance of being caught in a deadly storm or avalanche. Less lives will be at risk at once, as well (Adams). This also would result in less death if a disaster occurred. By only allowing a limited number of permits to be distributed, the risks on Everest would decrease significantly. To limit the number given out each climbing season, permits should be distributed on the basis of previous experience and physical condition, rather than whether or not a person has the money to afford one. One suggestion to decide who is allowed onto the mountain is to ask applicants to provide fitness details and list the mountains they have previously climbed to ensure that they are qualified to be on the mountain (Connolly). This would prevent climbers in less than peak condition, as well as less experienced climbers, from endangering themselves and others. A writer for National Geographic brought up the idea that “The expedition company could set up a mandatory policy by which it guides the client on at least one or two less demanding peaks to assess the client's qualifications and competence,” (National Geographic Adventure). The two ideas go hand in hand, with asking for a record of previous experience and then assessing clients before allowing them to make the climb Everest. This would weed out those who are not serious about climbing necessary to make it to the summit and back down to base safely. Another idea involves a newly developed test. Hopeful climbers could be tested using high altitude tests to ensure that they qualify for the climb based on their reactions to higher altitudes.

Open Document