The Greatest Outdoors Some things in nature are truly majestic mysteries to the human mind. The beautiful and puzzling movement patterns of various types of animals is only one example of the wonders that belong to nature. While enduring the hassle of everyday life, many people forget how nature is full of miraculous yet familiar events, creatures, and even ideas. Award winning author and remarkable short story writer John Updike instills a sensation of wonder and enchantment while depicting a magical occasion of his encounter with nature through his ingenious use of lax yet meticulous structure, colorful word choice, and imaginative figurative language in his narrative poem “The Great Scarf of Birds” The cinematic structure of this …show more content…
Updike applies repetition in the line “a cloud appeared, a cloud of dots” (16) which describes the flock in more depth and gives a slight visualization of the occurrences. Also, in the lines “Ripe apples were caught like red fish in the nets/ of their branches. The maples/ were colored like apples” (3-5), Updike again uses repetition but of the word apples to create a comparison between the surrounding environment and other aspects of fall but also applies words describing nature to describe other things in nature. Updike also incorporates alliteration to show the quickening pace of the heartbeat, thoughts, and emotions of the narrator when he begins to make sense of the great flock soaring above, such as seen in the lines “It dartingly darkened in spots, paled, pulsed compressed, distended, yet” (19-20). In these lines, the narrator uses mostly action verbs, which gives the movement and flow of the line a quick and urgent rhythm, to which a heart would beat when excited or nervous. In the line “I lazily looked around” (32), Updike also uses alliteration, but in this sense, he uses it to give a calming and peaceful feel, or to make the heart and thoughts seem to slow down. The narrator’s story-like and precise use of diction, helps the reader to feel and better imagine the atmosphere and mood during the
Updike begins the poem by personifying the characters as if he was a general leading an army. “My characters greet me with misty faces though chilled”, this line describes the characters as willing but scared soldiers ready to begin training. When Updike describes his characters as changing “clothes and mannerisms” with “instant obedience”, he further utilizes the technique of bringing his characters to life, and displays a connection between
Nature’s beauty has the ability to both entice its audience and frighten them. Mary Oliver in her passage explains her experiences with the two sides of nature. Her experiences with the owls elicit both an awe response and a frightened one. In connection, her experiences with a field of flowers draws a similar response where she is both astonished by them and overwhelmed. Oliver’s complex responses display the two sides of nature. It's ability to be both captivating yet overwhelming in its complexity. In “Owl” Mary Oliver uses descriptions of nature demonstrated by owls and fields of flowers in order to convey her complex responses to the two sides of nature.
...t is arguable that the birds fight is also a metaphor, implying the fight exists not only between birds but also in the father’s mind. Finally, the last part confirms the transformation of the parents, from a life-weary attitude to a “moving on” one by contrasting the gloomy and harmonious letter. In addition, readers should consider this changed attitude as a preference of the poet. Within the poem, we would be able to the repetitions of word with same notion. Take the first part of the poem as example, words like death, illness
Throughout the poem Updike relies on the use of vivid imagery to clearly allude to the complex relationship that he’s attempting to highlight between the novelist and his characters. His use of diction, such as “trench warfare,” “unraveling bandages,” and “a harsh taskmaster” result in producing a very gloomy imagery for the reader which results in the poem developing a very dark and negative mood which
The poet begins by describing the scene to paint a picture in the reader’s mind and elaborates on how the sky and the ground work in harmony. This is almost a story like layout with a beginning a complication and an ending. Thus the poem has a story like feel to it. At first it may not be clear why the poem is broken up into three- five line stanzas. The poet deliberately used this line stanzas as the most appropriate way to separate scenes and emotions to create a story like format.
The poem “Thanatopsis” by William Cullen Bryant reveals a very unusual aspect of nature. While most people think of nature as beauty and full of life, Bryant takes a more interesting approach to nature. He exposes a correlation between nature, life, death, and re-birth. Using nature as a foothold, Bryant exercises methods such as tone, setting, and imagery in a very intriguing way while writing “Thanatopsis.”
The air has a distinct sweetness as even the natural world seems to lead the couple down the road with ‘the honey breathing heather’ that lay to their left and right making it appear as though the air is thick with sweetness. While the repetition of the ‘h’ sound gives the poem an airy quality and reminds the reader of the alliteration of ‘west wind’, again drawing attention to the way the natural world appears to be encouraging the couple. ‘Her swift feet seem to float’, the soft alliteration of the ‘f ‘adds to the feeling of ease and floating while the repetition of the ‘t ‘sound at the end of each word adds to the quickness of the descent as the words are articulated cleanly and smoothly.
Therefore, Oliver’s incorporation of imagery, setting, and mood to control the perspective of her own poem, as well as to further build the contrast she establishes through the speaker, serves a critical role in creating the lesson of the work. Oliver’s poem essentially gives the poet an ultimatum; either he can go to the “cave behind all that / jubilation” (10-11) produced by a waterfall to “drip with despair” (14) without disturbing the world with his misery, or, instead, he can mimic the thrush who sings its poetry from a “green branch” (15) on which the “passing foil of the water” (16) gently brushes its feathers. The contrast between these two images is quite pronounced, and the intention of such description is to persuade the audience by setting their mood towards the two poets to match that of the speaker. The most apparent difference between these two depictions is the gracelessness of the first versus the gracefulness of the second. Within the poem’s content, the setting has been skillfully intertwined with both imagery and mood to create an understanding of the two poets, whose surroundings characterize them. The poet stands alone in a cave “to cry aloud for [his] / mistakes” while the thrush shares its beautiful and lovely music with the world (1-2). As such, the overall function of these three elements within the poem is to portray the
Introduction: Human-nonhuman encounters are embedded in social practices worldwide; animals play an active role in people’s social worlds and urban cognizance. Colin Jerolmack in “The Global Pigeon” exposes the symbiotic relationship between pigeons, the quintessential city bird, and humans in various ethnographic locales. Unlike the increasingly popular characterization of pigeons as nuisance animals, certain social classifications identify with the species on a more spiritual level. Practices involved with the birds include pigeon feeding in Venice and New York, pigeon racing in South Africa and Turkish tumblers in Berlin. Ultimately, the differing ways in which humans interact with nature illustrates their perceptions of the world and the
Updike the author of The Great Scarf of Birds ends the Poem by stating that his heart was lifted by the great scarf. The poems organization, dictation and figurative language throughout the poem is very peculiar. His word choice makes the reader feel happiness, joy, and even peace but once you get to the middle of the poem he changes his tone to show sadness.
John Updike’s poem “The Great Scarf of Birds” expresses the varying emotions the narrator experiences as he witnesses certain events from nature. His narration of the birds throughout the poem acts as numerous forms of imagery and symbolism concerning him and his life, and this becomes a recollection of the varying emotional stances he comes to terms with that he has experienced in his life. These changes are so gradually and powerfully expressed because of a fluent use of diction and figurative language, specifically symbolism and simile, and aided by organization.
Not only the words, but the figures of speech and other such elements are important to analyzing the poem. Alliteration is seen throughout the entire poem, as in lines one through four, and seven through eight. The alliteration in one through four (whisky, waltzing, was) flows nicely, contrasting to the negativity of the first stanza, while seven through eight (countenance, could) sound unpleasing to the ear, emphasizing the mother’s disapproval. The imagery of the father beating time on the child’s head with his palm sounds harmful, as well as the image of the father’s bruised hands holding the child’s wrists. It portrays the dad as having an ultimate power over the child, instead of holding his hands, he grabs his wrists.
Updike is famous for taking other author's works and twisting them so that they reflect a more contemporary flavor. While the story remains the same, the climate is singular only to Updike. This is the reason why there are similarities as well as deviations from Joyce's original piece. Plot, theme and detail are three of the most resembling aspects of the two stories over all other literary components; characteristic of both writers' works, each rendition offers its own unique perspective upon the young man's romantic infatuation. Not only are descriptive phrases shared by both stories, but parallels occur with each ending, as well (Doloff 113).
Nature is often a focal point for many author’s works, whether it is expressed through lyrics, short stories, or poetry. Authors are given a cornucopia of pictures and descriptions of nature’s splendor that they can reproduce through words. It is because of this that more often than not a reader is faced with multiple approaches and descriptions to the way nature is portrayed. Some authors tend to look at nature from a deeper and personal observation as in William Wordsworth’s “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud”, while other authors tend to focus on a more religious beauty within nature as show in Gerard Manley Hopkins “Pied Beauty”, suggesting to the reader that while to each their own there is always a beauty to be found in nature and nature’s beauty can be uplifting for the human spirit both on a visual and spiritual level.
“A Bird came down the Walk,” was written in c. 1862 by Emily Dickinson, who was born in 1830 and died in 1886. This easy to understand and timeless poem provides readers with an understanding of the author’s appreciation for nature. Although the poem continues to be read over one hundred years after it was written, there is little sense of the time period within which it was composed. The title and first line, “A Bird came down the Walk,” describes a common familiar observation, but even more so, it demonstrates how its author’s creative ability and artistic use of words are able to transform this everyday event into a picture that results in an awareness of how the beauty in nature can be found in simple observations. In a step like narrative, the poet illustrates the direct relationship between nature and humans. The verse consists of five stanzas that can be broken up into two sections. In the first section, the bird is eating a worm, takes notice of a human in close proximity and essentially becomes frightened. These three stanzas can easily be swapped around because they, for all intents and purposes, describe three events that are able to occur in any order. Dickinson uses these first three stanzas to establish the tone; the tone is established from the poet’s literal description and her interpretive expression of the bird’s actions. The second section describes the narrator feeding the bird some crumbs, the bird’s response and its departure, which Dickinson uses to elaborately illustrate the bird’s immediate escape. The last two stanzas demonstrate the effect of human interaction on nature and more specifically, this little bird, so these stanzas must remain in the specific order they are presented. Whereas most ...