John Murray Religious Equality Analysis

1701 Words4 Pages

3. Religious Equality

3.1 Universalism
Universalism is “the belief that all people are chosen by God for salvation [and follows] the doctrine of universal election and universal redemption” (OED). Professor Nina Baym adds that universalist doctrine teaches that “God was rational”, He “would never doom most of his creatures to eternal damnation” and “all human beings constituted a single family under God’s loving fatherhood” who could all enjoy a “paradisiacal afterlife” (vi). Not only did the Sargent family convert to these religious principles, but Murray remarried an Universalist minister, who treated her as his equal. Skemp highlights the significance of religion in the Sargent family writing “They were abandoning their past, rejecting …show more content…

In the second part of the essay, one could observe Murray’s disagree with the enduring masculine interpretation of the Bible when she departs from the traditional understanding of the fall of man. Murray even challenges the biblical basis of women inferiority by citing the story of Adam and Eve. Murray exposes the “flawed nature of men represented by Adam while depicting Eve as an example of women’s intellectual curiosity” (Hughes 112). Murray portrays Eve’s action that of curiosity, “A laudable ambition fired her soul and a thirst for knowledge impelled the predilection so fatal in its consequences” (Selected 12). Murray retells the story “that all the arts of the grand deceiver were requisite to mislead our general mother, while the father of mankind forfeited his own, and relinquished the happiness of posterity, merely in compliance with the blandishments of a female” (Selected 13). Murray determines that Eve’s fall from grace resulted from her “desire of adorning her mind” and “attain[ing] a perfection of knowledge” (Selected 12) compared to Adam, who simply gave into “a bare pusillanimous attachment to a woman!” (Selected 13) unable to control himself. After all, Eve ate from the Tree of Knowledge. Murray perceives Eve’s action as a “laudable ambition” whereas Adam only sinned because of his sexual attraction …show more content…

During the 1800s, it was unusual for women to published their literature, which itself could be considered rebellious. Plus, Murray did not compromise her ideas on women's rights regarding education, she merely mediated them due to her reader awareness. She chose her words and her arguments carefully as to maintain her public image, since one’s “reputation was a woman's most prized possession” (Skemp, Biography, 182), yet was able to argue that women’s deficient understanding was instigated by nurture rather than nature. Murray’s attitude of entitlement made her demand more for herself and other women, thus introducing a larger conversation on gender equality during her lifetime. Murray created a mental meritocracy discourse, which has become a part of the early American

Open Document