Jeff Hughes: The Manhattan Project

976 Words2 Pages

In The Manhattan project, Jeff Hughes claims that the development of atomic weapons in World War II did not create “Big Science,” but simply accelerated trends in scientific research and development that had already taken place. Hughes was able to support his argument by introducing the Big science and the atomic bomb which was a main factor of World War II. Hughes introduce “Big Science” saying, during the twentieth century, almost every aspect of science changed. He went on to explain that geographically, science spread from few countries to many. Institutionally, it spread from universities and specialist organizations to find new homes in government, public and private industry and the military. Intellectually, its contours changed with the development of entirely new disciplines and the blurring of boundaries between old ones. Hughes introduce the atomic bomb in his argument saying it was the mission by British and American scientists to develop nuclear weapons. This was known as the Manhattan project. Ways in which the construction of the atomic bomb reflect a “Big Science” approach to research and development was by making scientist share their work with each other, including universities as their laboratories for …show more content…

Hughes was successful in providing appropriate argument to show that these ways were an approach to research and development. I believe that such an approach was necessary because as explained, before the atomic bomb was thought off, scientists did their work in small quantity which took longer, or was never finished. After the atomic bomb when every one started working together and sharing ideas, things were done quicker and everyone gained the knowledge and benefited from

Open Document