Jay Dolmage's Breathe Upon Us An Even Flame

1315 Words3 Pages

Jay Dolmage challenges the current ideals of rhetoric “Breathe Upon Us an Even Flame”: Hephaestus, History, and the Body of Rhetoric by reviving Hephaestus, a disabled Greek God. This rather unknown character is the very embodiment of metis allowing him to act in a world of chance (Dolmage). Using this mythical personality Dolmage is able to defend the fact that mētis must be recognized as rhetoric, and the only way to accomplish this is to write new stories that may glorify one’s imperfections by making them more important in society. Dolmage chose to use Hephaestus as the exemplary character in his work because Hephaestus himself “was said to symbolize mētis”. Nowadays metis is defined as “any person of mixed ancestry” (Metis), however in Dolmage’s work he points out another definition that is “complex but very coherent body of mental attitudes and intellectual behavior” (Dolmage). While the meaning has evolved, it’s meaning within the context of this work must be kept in mind. Considering that, Dolmage also considers the multiple uses for mētis. Including its use as a “pedagogical strategy”, that is it can be used to teach (Pedagogy). It is pointed out how …show more content…

This is due to a stigma that presented itself during the Vietnam era – that is the time of the Vietnam War. Countless men were drafted into a war that no one wanted to fight. A study conducted in 1980 found that “Vietnam veterans who entered the military, served and fought in Vietnam, and were released into a hostile American society were severely handicapped” (Conflict). These men who were forced to give their lives, to become disabled in many cases, were released in this “hostile” society that hated them for doing what was not a choice on their end. They should have been honored like those who fought before them in World War II, but they were completely dismissed, despised, and left to fight for their own

Open Document