Jane Jacobs

550 Words2 Pages

Jane Jacobs (1916-2006) was an avant-garde urbanist whose writings encouraged a fresh outlook to city planning. Even though she had no formal training as a city planner, “The Death and Life of great American cities” is still one of the most prominent books on urban planning in which she presents innovative thinking about how cities function, develop and fail. Jacobs explains how cities should function as cohesive systems in which they have their own logic and ‘vitality’ which inevitably adjusts overtime to how they’re being used. The book is evidently a venomous attack and heavily criticizes the modern orthodox planning and rebuilding cities in the post war U.S. Apparent from the very start, Jacobs uses a very striking and straightforward opening line: “This book is an attack on current city planning and rebuilding. It is …show more content…

1). The fact she then deliberately reiterates the word “attack” (pg. 1) highlights her explicitly aggressive view on the entire establishment. In Jacobs eyes, the strategies in rebuilding which the planners followed has clearly not been successful: it has neither eradicated elements of slums, nor has it halted the decay of neighbourhoods within cities. She places this blame not only on city planners, but upon philosophers and educators. “Jane Jacobs believes that most problems, if solvable at all, will be solved not by the elaborate schemes of experts but by spontaneous invention.” Jacobs particularly condemns both the notion of Garden Cities by Ebenezer Howard and the radiant city idea of Le Corbusier, which both dominated the forward thinking at the time, contending that they lack a clear understanding of how cities actually function. Corbusier’s idea was that streets were deemed bad and proposed a strict, totalitarian idea full of symmetry and high rise buildings. Ebenezer Howard concluded cities as a whole were bad “he hated the city and thought it an outright evil” (pg. 17), and

Open Document