Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does language influence communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does language influence communication
In this serious article, author Jack Rosenthal argues about language that’s being written and spoken in order to inform readers to know the difference between the two. I can connect this to today’s society. We are now creating our own language by using abbreviations. For example: “OMG”, “LOL”, or “LMAFO”. I notice that what’s not being typed is what we choose to speak. “Spoken language is by nature casual, so its ascendancy has brought informality,” (Rosenthal 15). I believe Rosenthal means that once language is spoken, it can influence everyone to speak the same. I believe this is very true. Without technology, I’m sure I would speak very formally. Now, I see all types of different slang words that I would have never known about unless I had
A good influence, good mood/ positive outlook on life, and polite. These are some qualities that a good friend should have. Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson, young adult novel. Melinda Sordino would not make a good friend because she is a bad influence, she doesn’t speak up when she needs to and she often seems to be in a bad mood.
Imagine families waking up on their kid’s sixth birthday and having to head towards the nearest cotton mill instead of going out and celebrating the occasion. All over the country kids of different ages were working in the same unsafe conditions as adults to help their family earn money. Florence Kelley’s speech was to fight for better working conditions and child labor laws in the early 1900’s. At this time each state had distinct laws about the work requirements. The author uses various forms of rhetorical devices such as pathos, personifications, and repetition throughout the speech to gain the audience’s support.
“Your Ability to Can Even: A Defense of Internet Linguistics” by Tia Baheri, is a great read. The article focuses on the new language that has been created among Internet users and how some critics think it is a negative impact on the English language and how others, such as Baheri herself, think that there is nothing wrong with the change what so ever. After reading the article, I agree with Tia Baheri, I also think that language is as she states, “Supposed to flex and shape itself to convey what we mean to say as directly and efficiently as possible”. Yes, some who do not spend a lot of time on the Internet may not understand some of the newly used phrases but for others it is the best way to express themselves.
I became inspired to become a speech-language pathologist when I first watched the film, Paulie. This film depicted a small girl, named Marie that had a speech impediment, which caused her to stutter. In order to improve Marie’s speech her mother would pronounce certain sounds and practice daily with her. While watching this film I began to realize that there is a number of individuals in our population that have different speech impairments. As I noticed how the character of Marie struggled with her speech impairment I sought to research the different treatments for individuals similar to Marie, and came across speech therapy and speech-language pathologists. I have always been fascinated by language and how it is essential in communication. I view speech-language pathologists as having a major role in helping
Is texting really killing our language? Or are we allowing texting to kill our language? There are many ways to use texting, maybe just the ways some of us are using texting is killing our language. According to John Mcwhorter texting is writing as we speak. What he means by that statement is that we talk how we text or visa versa, basically what he's saying is that texting is used more for our regular day language than our professional language. When we are talking we don't think to punctuate or anything of that cause, we do the same thing when we’re texting, there is barely anyone that will use proper language to text their friends, nowadays we use slang words in our text like saying ima, instead of saying i'm going to or like saying ttyl,
The world, as of the 21st century, is increasingly becoming an interconnected, interrelated social place in which avoidance of human interaction is near impossible. From telephone calls to advertising billboards, communication is ubiquitous. Communication essentially refers to the generation and receiving of messages across a variety of contexts, channels, media, and cultures. This complex interaction is composed of both verbal and non-verbal interactions. Verbal language is defined as the use of sounds and language to communicate a message and thus accents, dialects, and languages all fall under this “verbal code.” Its counterpart, non-verbal language, is communication through a host of nonlinguistic methods, including physical appearance, kinesics, and olfactics.
Since the Industrial Revolution, technology has permeated and become an integral part of our everyday lives. In fact, a life without technology seems almost impossible to imagine. Almost everyone, around the globe, has access to technology in one form or another. Consequently this type of technology has become ingrained into our culture. Its roots are so deep that it is now peculiar to see someone without a smartphone than with one. Consequently, smartphones and the Internet have radically changed the manner in which we communicate and how we communicate with one another. Our speech has metamorphosed so much from that of our grandparents that it almost seems like a foreign language due to the incorporation of slang and “text talk.” With the sudden surge of email, blogs, and instant messaging that occurred within the last couple of decades, the impact that technology has on our linguistics has become more pronounced. Technology has helped to bridge the gap between people by allowing us to communicate as easily as we breathe. On this note, one would think that the dawn of the Era of Technology would give birth to a renaissance of the English language but, instead, the converse is taking place. With such widespread prevalence of technology such as smartphones and computers, the degradation of the English language is a problem now more than ever.
The average person does not give much thought to the way we perceive speaking and writing: event or thing? Writing and speaking It is so innate, or as Ong says of writing “deeply interiorized” in most of us that we use these methods of communication every day without considering what it means for how we communicate and even perceive ourselves and others. Ong describes writing itself as a technology which changes how we look at words in general whether spoken or written. These ideas can particularly be applied to computers and internet technology as methods of communication.
“Buzz buzz!” Everyone is familiar with the vibration of their simple, yet sudden notification that you have just received a text. Texting is a quick way of sending and receiving information, good or bad; is this adept way of communicating having an acute long-term effect on our literacy? David Crystal a professor at the University of Wales known for his work in English language studies and linguistics. He wrote the essay “2b or Not 2b”, and in his work he claims that texting helps rather than hinders literacy (337). From this perspective, he reminds us that abbreviations have been around for ages, even before texting; he gives the example of Eric Partridge and his Dictionary of Abbreviations that has many SMS looking examples. Later he also
Languages like text speak is a reflection of social differences and relations of power and domination. The fact that Mr. Humphrys claimed superiority of the formal English language, and condemned text speech as a threat and sin, is viewable by sociolinguists as a form of stratification in the making. John Humphrys is a journalist who practices the use of formal English language on a daily basis. Therefore, it is not surprising that he would rank formal English as better due to his associations. Also, Mr. Humphrys specifically targeted younger generations as threats due to the popularity of text messaging in younger generations. John Humphrys wrote in his article, “The danger – for young people especially – is that they will come to dominate.” He seems to be worried for the younger generation at first, fearing that text messaging will destroy their formal English skills. However, younger people are only a fraction of the whole that uses text speak regularly. Mr. Humphrys ' claims backfire on his “good intention”, and can be viewed by many sociolinguists as stigmatization. If the majority of text speak users were PhD graduates and professors in linguistics, would Mr. Humphrys still have written this article? I believe that Mr. Humphrys ' confidence in his belief results from the view that younger populations are of lower-status. Thus, the popular practice of text
Bilingual education have been a serious issue for immigrant student. Beginners in education who move to the United States, have an issue with communication, in how to understand English, and losing their identity. For immigrants students, not knowing a second language affect seriously their life in the United States. In his article “An Education in Language,” Richard Rodriguez presents how the English language became a barrier that changed him and his family. Rodriguez explains how hard the challenge of understanding English was for him during his early years of school. Besides, Rodriguez illustrates that his parents’ lives were affected by lacking education and their opinion about it. In addition, he moved over to pursue higher education.
In a sociolinguist perspective “the idea of a spoken standardized language is a hypothetical construct” (Lippi-Green, 2012, pp. 57). They are the form of Britain English and American English that are used in textbooks and on broadcasting. Giles and Coupland observe that “A standard variety is the one that is most often associated with high socioeconomic status, power and media usage in a particular community” (1991, p. 38). Both native speakers and learners of English, where English is taught as a second or foreign language (hereafter ESL/EFL), speak dialect of English in everyday conversation (Kachru, 2006, pp. 10-11; Owens 2012, p.
The medium on which this conversation occurs carries different societal weights. Handwritten letters and private messages both are text-based mediums, but carry a different reaction based on the society that it is communicated in. Fulk explains this concept: “symbolic features need not be fixed attributes of a medium. The symbolic meanings may well arise, be sustained, and evolve through on-going processes of joint sensemaking within social systems,” (Fulk, 1993, p 922). Today, humanity has veered away from personalized communication and has taken advantage of technology’s ability of efficiency. Krauss asserts, “It is through the versatility of language that communication is possible within the constraints of society,” (Krauss, 2002, p 11). Whatever the medium, communication is essential to survival will always be dictated by society through the structure of language and
Speech- The dictionary explanation of speech is “The expression of or the ability to express thoughts and feelings by articulate sounds” or “A person's style of speaking” Speaking is physically being able to produce sounds and sound patterns of our own language (mine being English) from our voices, or to be able to produce speech with a familiar rhythm.
In the last twenty-five years, advancements in technology combined with the unbridled growth of social media, has dramatically altered not only the methods used to communicate but the linguistics as well. The meteoric rise in the use of new media sources have resulted in the creation of a type of shorthand English. With today’s social media, abbreviations such as LOL, OMG, BRB, and ROFL are easily recognizable by its followers yet remain a mystery to those not connected. The preference of the younger generation for social media such as texting, Twitter, and Facebook over face–to-face communication has not only had an effect on communication skills, but has also led to a further disconnect with the adult population. Twenty years ago, when a family went out to dinner it was considered family time; an opportunity for all the family members to get caught up with what was going on in each other’s life. Today, watching that same family outing, one is much more likely to see each of them sitting at the same table, looking down at a smart phone texting, and very little if any co...