Isolation In The Relationship Between Sherlock Holmes And Irene Adler

884 Words2 Pages

An initial trope revealed in this passage is the tension of intimacy versus isolation specifically in the relationship between the characters of Sherlock Holmes and Irene Adler. For instance, although Sherlock refers to Irene Adler as “the woman,” and this appears to exemplify a sort of intimacy or “closeness” by reflecting images of monogamy and “oneness,” the title also serves to demonstrate distance of character (OED). It reflects that of an archetype and perhaps is essential in signifying that just like a persona as a “projected image,” Sherlock’s understanding of Irene Adler is likewise only manufactured (OED). Through her “assumed role,” she “eclipses […] the whole of her sex in Sherlock’s mind” and so, like an eclipse, is able to “obscure” …show more content…

For example, John relates Sherlock to a machine by describing him as a “cold and precise,” “perfect reasoning and observing machine” who finds “all emotions (as being) abhorrent.” However, it is through the effects of Irene Adler that subverts this character profile. As the metaphors at the end of the paragraph elude to, Adler acts as the “grit” to Sherlock’s nature as an “[…] instrument” or the “crack” in his “[…] deductive powers” that interferes with his abilities. Therefore, Irene Adler transforms Sherlock from a “trained reasoner” into someone who is unsure; as the final sentence shows when it connotes the language of “dubious” or “doubting” and “questionable” to the knowledge of Irene Adler’s character (OED). She is the “distracting factor which […] throw(s) doubt upon all his (Sherlock’s) mental …show more content…

By understanding the passage’s literary form as it is expressed through a duality of intimacy and isolation, images of role reversals in both gender and character traits and the image of the femme fatale, Irene Adler’s inherent power as the central figure of the story becomes clear. Her ability to distance herself away from Sherlock Holmes despite his efforts to define her as “the woman” and avoid being restricted to a canonically passive female role is necessary for predicting her eventual evasion at the end of the

Open Document