Uncanny Essay

1593 Words4 Pages

languages describes ‘uncanny’ as ‘daemonic’ (Freud 221), which speaks for itself. In primitive cultures during the animistic stage of development both producing and eradicating of ‘demons’ or any other form of the evil force required magic or occult technique. Just as magic requires technique, so does the notion of art. ‘Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and choice, is thought to aim at some good; and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim. But a certain difference is found among ends; some are activities, others are products apart from the activities that produce them. Where there are ends apart from the actions, it is the nature of the products to be better than the activities.’ …show more content…

The Greek word ‘τέχνη’ – ‘techne’ is variously translated as ‘skill’, ‘craft’, ‘knowledge’, ‘form of expertise’, and ‘art’. Thus, when we talk about the essence of art, it can be argued that the uncanny begins with its very moment of creating, as it poses a form of technique applied by an artist. Therefore, just as the independently functioning terms defining the ‘techne’ become interconnected, they can be argued as such without a coherent boundary among them, which can be regarded as a characteristic of the uncanny, namely the transgression of boundaries (Lörke, 124). As a result, this linguistic controversy may be considered as a grounding feature that manifest the uncanniness in art in general, consequently uncanny sensation is triggered by the traces of technique that are persistent in Schiele’s …show more content…

Thus, the transgressed boundaries between visual intertexts can be considered as a source of the uncanny, namely the ‘involuntary’ repetition (Freud 237), where the boundaries of the selfhood – the artist and the other – the viewer, of the present – 1911 and the past – 1910, of the primordial and the death are transgressed. The bulky background shrouds the figures by dark colouring, whereas Schiele distinguishes the figures on canvas through lighter and darker hues of oil. The interplay of the darker and the lighter shades reflects the function of the double – to unite the opposite notions and to transgress the boundaries. Furthermore, the importance of such an interplay is additionally unveiled by Schiele in a letter to Dr. Hermann Engel by stating that ‘Das Bild muss von sich Licht geben, die Korper haben ihr eigenes Licht, das sie beim Leben verbrauchen; sie verbrennen, sie sind unbeleuchtet’ (Nebehay, 1979, 228) that implicitly implies a lifespan from birth to death, which is a prevailing motif of Schiele’s works. The uncanniness is also suggested by fragmentation that is embodied in the portrayal of a detached hand. Furthermore, the title itself transgresses the boundaries in between The Self-Seers I (1910) and The Self-Seers II (Death and Man) (1911) through

Open Document