Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lord of the flies critical analysis
Lord of the flies critical analysis
Lord of the flies critical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lord of the flies critical analysis
Lord of the Flies
In a life or death situation, would you save your best friend or yourself? It is often questioned whether human instinct is good or bad. Some people seem like they do have good human instinct on the inside but that claim may be questionable. I believe that everyone has bad human instinct, it just sometimes takes other people to bring out that bad instinct. In Lord of the Flies, Jack and Roger had bad human instinct that was exposed immediately, while others such as Ralph and Piggy took time to have their bad instincts be presented, once others helped lead it out.
Jack always had an extremely violent personality, no matter what the situation was. He always had his mind on killing things such as when he pointed and said, “Of
…show more content…
He created a game where a boy would pretend to be the pig and his hunters would circle around and act as if they were on the verge of killing the boy. At one point, Jack wanted to “[u]se a littlun,” (115). This proves that he wants his victim to be weak. He wants them to struggle, while he can overpower them to give himself the pleasure of feeling dominant. Not only is he putting his friend in danger, he is possibly making them feel embarrassed in front of the others. He is putting his own needs above others, once again proving his bad human instinct to be …show more content…
He also talked of the other boys in an uncivilized manner. As the group of boys followed Jack towards the end of the island instead of listening to Ralph, Piggy proceeded to label their actions “‘[l]ike kids!’ he said scornfully. ‘Acting like a crowd of kids!’” (38). By calling the others like a group of little kids, he is implying that he as above them, or better them. This is a major change from when he accepted a random stranger into his society. His bad human instincts were brought out into the open yet once again. These bad human instincts that were suddenly being exposed are comparable to Jack’s. Jack wanted the littluns to suffer in the dancing game instead of him, implying that he thinks he is better than them. This is exactly what Piggy is doing in this situation, implying that he is better than the others. A legitimate explanation for this is that the spending of time that he had with Jack throughout island stranding, allowed for his bad human instincts to finally come out.
Lastly, Simon once had a very honorable character. He was very helpful to the others, and did what he could to help. One day, Ralph said that all day he had “been working with Simon. No one else. They’re off bathing, or eating, or playing,” (50). While Simon could have been having a lot more fun playing with the other boys, he decided to stay and help Ralph with what really needed done. This paved the perfect path for readers
While Jack and Ralph represent the distinct polarization between civilization and savagery. Simon is separated from both of these dimensions. Simon represents built-in goodness. The other boys who hold on to their sense of morality only do so because society has conditioned and trained them to act in a certain way. They do not have an innate sense of morality. Unlike the other boys on the island, Simon does not act morally because an external force has compelled him to do so, instead he finds value in performing good actions.
Piggy is also very intimidated by boys like Jack and Roger. For example, when Jack tells Piggy to shut up “Piggy [wilts]”and this shows that his confidence always seems to go down whenever boys like Jack are
he may lack in the athletic field, but his brain made up tremendously for that loss. In the first couple chapters, Ralph thought a fire would be beneficial in order to get rescued so, Piggy utilized his glasses, directed the lenses towards the sun and fire appeared. Thirdly, Simon represented the good on the island. All the young boys turned to Simon as their leader because Simon did not see age difference, he welcomed all with open arms. He also helped Ralph with the unstable shelters when the rest were distracted with antics, Simon is an overall warm hearted kid.
Simon was the observant character, the quiet philosopher. He was often alone, sometimes by his own choice, and he liked to wander into the peaceful jungle. He sincerely cared about the other boys, sometimes helping the young ones to fetch fruit, yet "Simon turned away from them and went where the just perceptible path led him. Soon high jungle closed in" (56). He loved solitude and yet felt loneliness; he was alien to the other boys. The boys did not think anyone would be stupid enough to go into the jungle by night: "The assembly grinned at the thought of going out into the darkness. Then Simon stood up and Ralph looked at him in astonishment" (85). Many of the boys even thought he was "batty" because he left the group to spend time alone.
Once this happened Piggy started to care less and less about the boys and more about his own safety and getting himself off the island with or without the boys. Jack had taken Piggy’s glasses to start his own fire and Piggy was very upset and he took Ralph and the twins over to Jack’s tribe and demanded his glasses back, but Ralph got a little sidetracked so Piggy brought him back. “‘Ralph remember what we came for. The fire. My specs’”(177)
Jack Merridew is the devil-like figure in the story, Lord of the Flies. Jack is wicked in nature having no feelings for any living creature. His appearance and behavior intimidates the others from their first encounter. The leading savage, Jack leans more towards hunting and killing and is the main reason behind the splitting of the boys. It has been said that Jack represents the evilness of human nature; but in the end, Jack is almost a hero. With his totalitarian leadership, he was able to organize the group of boys into a useful and productive society
"It is a man's own mind, not his enemy or foe, that lures him to evil ways." (Buddha) Is man basically good or is man basically evil? In the popular novel, Lord of the Flies, William Goldings shows that man is basically evil, but that man can overcome those instincts if he tries. Simon, Ralph, and Piggy are prime examples of keeping their good character. In each of them there is a desire to do good. They show throughout the novel that it is possible, even when surrounded by evil, to put aside desires and keep good morals.
Jack has always been an ill-natued boy even from the start of the book when he told Piggy to "Shut up, Fatty." (p.23). Dispite Jack’s unpleasent personality, his lack of courage and his conscience preventing him from killing the first pig they encountered. "They knew very well why he hadn’t; because of the enormity of the knife decending and cutting into living flesh; because of the unbearable blood." (p.34)
The fact that Jack acts like this is very important to the story. Jack’s lust for power and blood sped the story up a lot faster. It’s possible that without Jack the boys wouldn’t even become savage. Jack is also a bully, and forces the boys out of fear into what he wants them to do. In, “The Lord of the Flies”, by William Golding, Jack is pretty much equivalent to a middle school bully, but the circumstances he is in, turns him into something even worse.
age by being more interested in having fun than working. Secondly, all the boys leave Ralph's hard-working group to join Jack's group who just want to have fun. The day after the death of Simon when Piggy! and Ralph are bathing, Piggy points beyond the platform and says, "That's where. " they're gone. Jack's party. Just for some meat. And for hunting. pretending to be a tribe and putting on war paint. " (163). Piggy realizes exactly why the boys have gone to Jack's, which would be fun. excitement. The need to play and have fun in Jack's group, even though The boys risk the tribe's brutality and the chance of not being rescued.
Piggy had an appetite to be needed and accepted as a person in the boys' society. Jack had to kill a pig; he saw no other way.
This is a big contrast to the other boys on the island who are afraid to be alone. Moreover, Simon can also be seen as the yang in the yin and yang circle. Meaning he can be seen as the good in the overwhelming chaos. Simon is described as having metaphorical “...eyes so bright they had deceived Ralph into thinking him delightfully gay and wicked” (Golding 55). This differs from other boys, because they do not have this kind of light in them, instead they have dark and twisted souls.
Throughout William Golding's novel Lord of the Flies there is an ever-present conflict between two characters. Ralph's character combines common sense with a strong desire for civilized life. Jack, however, is an antagonist with savage instincts, which he cannot control. Ralph's goals to achieve a team unit with organization are destroyed by Jack's actions and words that are openly displayed to the boys. The two leaders try to convince the boys that their way of survival is correct.
...er mock Piggy, when he “made a move toward Piggy…[and] mimicked the whine and scramble by saying, ‘Jus’ you wait-yah!’” By doing this, Jack causes all of the younger hunters to laugh, giving him even more power over them all because of the new power that the mask gave him, by allowing him to be cruel and unkind.
In the beginning, Simon was described as a 'skinny, vivid little boy…,'; (Golding 24) showing that he was undersized and possibly weaker than the others. He stuck around Ralph for a while, went exploring with him and Jack, and even helped him build the shelters. It was not long before he began to wander off by himself to that little place among the creepers. The other boys thought he was 'queer….funny.'; (55) because he was an outcast and rather strange.