Inquiry To Examine Racial Bias In The San Francisco Police Case Study

1245 Words3 Pages

In the New York Time Article by Timothy William, Inquiry to Examine Racial Bias in the San Francisco Police Department, first thing to remember known as implicit social cognition, implicit bias refer to the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions in an unconscious manner. Another key point to argument is that there is no systematic bias in the criminal justice base on race. To point out, in performing their policing duties, police officer are able to exercise a high degree of discretion. This means that they have a have a broad freedom to make decision about how to act on the given situation. For this reason some police officer deliberately use their wide power of discretion and their authority to perform …show more content…

Ian Furminger. And together with and former Officer Edmond Robles both were convicted in a federal corruption trial. At the same time, Federal prosecutors released dozens of racist and homophobic texts when they became public during a bail hearing for former Officer Ian Furminger, who was convicted for public corruption late last year. As a matter of fact, his crimes include stealing money and drugs from dealers, among others. In this one, he 's accused of texting racist and homophobic messages to other cops. On Tuesday, among all the uproar, he wanted to get his side of the story out. The offensive texts were released by federal prosecutors during a bail hearing last week. The four other officers have been reassigned to units with no public contact while the department investigates the scandal. First thing to remember the court system has sentence an individual who is charged with enforcing the laws and put into the same system he protect. In fact when a law enforcement officer violates his oath, the victims are not only the people directly affected by it, but all of us. A jury convicted Furminger in December of two counts of wire fraud, conspiracy against civil rights, and conspiracy to commit theft. Direct evidence linked Furminger to thefts committed by his subordinates, although Vargas and others testified he was involved in a conspiracy to steal property from suspects, including an Apple gift card and, in one incident, more than $30,000 in cash. Furminger spoke briefly with reporters after he was sentenced. He said he had urged the SFPD to implement stricter policies for plainclothes officers, but the department ignored him. “That’s not my job,” he said. “My job is to protect my people. I was papa bear, and I rocked. I made it happen. I made everything happen. We caught everybody.” (Furminger) He 's appealing that conviction, saying he was framed. And now he 's involved in another

In this essay, the author

  • Argues that there is no systematic bias in the criminal justice base on race. discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin is morally wrong and violates the principle of impartiality.
  • Explains that the blue ribbon panel on transparency, fairness and accountability in law enforcement reportedly tried to obtain personnel files and testimony from police officers involved in the racist text message scandal.
Show More
Open Document