Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Photograph manipulation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Photograph manipulation
Images hold power. Consider reading an article online. While reading, your eye may be drawn to the images around it. Some of the images are clearly manipulative, such as ads. Others, like the ones concerning the article you’re reading, seem to be much more objective. However can we really say these images are objective? Images have always been manipulated to shed a better or worse light on the subject matter. This happen in the cold war when Joseph Stalin edited individuals out of pictures, making it seem as if they had never existed. This also happened in ancient Egypt, where rulers were given much more attractive faces on their Sarcophagi then they had in real life. It still occurs now. The advent of Photoshop has made these manipulations more convincing and ever more prevalent. Are these manipulations ethical? Is presenting an image is an objective representation of an event when, in fact, it has been altered a morally acceptable practice? I would argue that it is unethical to manipulate an image when being …show more content…
Informational photography is a photo taken with the intent of illustrating or displaying an event. An artistic photo is a photo that has been created for artistic value or intent. An informational photo may be an artistic photo as well but an artistic photo may not be an informational photo. This is because art is inherently subjective; it cannot be used to illustrate an objective point in news related context. How you interpret a piece is dependent upon your own experience and past. It can mean one thing to you and hold an entirely different meaning to someone else. A piece of art can intentionally manipulate your perceptions and ideals, simply to prove it can, or perhaps to make a point about society. An optical illusion manipulates your perception for the sake of doing so. How you interpret the meaning of a piece is dependent upon your own
In a society dominated by visual activity it is not uncommon to be faced with images
People tend to views an image based on how society say it should be they tend to interpret the image on those assumption, but never their own assumptions. Susan Bordo and John Berger writes’ an argumentative essay in relation to how viewing images have an effect on the way we interpret images. Moreover, these arguments come into union to show what society plants into our minds acts itself out when viewing pictures. Both Susan Bordo and John Berger shows that based on assumptions this is what causes us to perceive an image in a certain way. Learning assumption plays into our everyday lives and both authors bring them into reality.
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Photography has been around for nearly 200 years and has advanced dramatically with the new technology. In 1826, when the first photograph was taken photography was a very basic art form, but soon after photographers figured out how to manipulate their photos. In today’s society, it is almost unheard of to look at photographs that are raw and unedited, but has it always been this way? Dating back to the first photograph in 1826 by Joseph Nicephore Niepce, photography seemed to be raw, but only a few decades after those photographers discovered they could alter their photos to make them more appealing (“Harry Ransom Center”). Over the past 200 years photos of all different subjects have been manipulated through history and technology seems to be the culprit.
First, let us define Photojournalism and Fine Art Photography. According to the Oxford dictionary, photojournalism is the art or practice of communicating news by photographs, especially in magazines. But according to Merriam-Webster, photojournalism’s full definition is journalism in which written copy is subordinate to pictorial usually photographic presentation of news stories or in which a high proportion of pictorial presentation is used. In other words, photojournalism is news photography. Photojournalism found itself invading photography from the late 1920’s and can be defined as a spontaneous and newsworthy photographic narrative of human events. Fine Art Photography is the new kid on the block. It is usually thought to refer to the visual creation for a specific expressive or aesthetic value. This is often distingui...
Unlike science, art is subjective. The artist leaves behind a part of himself in his work. Therefore, each piece has its own distinct perspective. Frida Kahlo’s self-portraits show her view on her life, on how she has faced so many struggles, yet managed to be a strong person. When we see or hear or read an artistic creation, it produces a mood such as calm or loud, fear or safety. For example, the Eiffel Tower gives Paris a majestic awe; everyone who passes by feels the strength of the 113-year-old grand structure. Art also has a texture. Photographs reveal much through their textures; grainy surfaces often make the picture more realistic while smooth ones seem softer. When we hear a piece of music or see a film, a rhythm carries us from one part to another. Not just true for these two genres, rhythm is present in any artistic work. These few properties are characteristic of everything we encounter in the world of art, the world of human expression. Most have other special features also. Most of the time, though, we do not think about these characteristics because we do not have enough time to pay attention to anything for more than a few seconds.
They may even argue that in they are ethical in the situations already listed. I agree that there are some situations when doctored photos are completely acceptable. Sometimes they can be used as art such as Halsman’s photograph, The Dali Atomicus. There are also times when pictures are changed only slightly in order to improve the quality, such as lighting or darkening a photograph. In these cases the picture is not meant to misrepresent an opponent or product, harm a person’s reputation, or lower self-esteem. However doctored photographs can be immoral when used to deceive, even if the changes seem minute. An example would be the suspension of photographer Bryan Patrick from the Sacramento Bee due to minor changes made to some photographs. A Newstex article addressed several people who thought that the punishment did not match the crime. They stated that even though the changes were minor “a news photo must represent the truth” (Photo ethics 101). In order for the public to trust a news source to be honest about large details, they must first be honest about small details. Doctored photos are not always immoral, but they can easily be used unethically to deceive, ruin reputations, and lower
through today's ads which eschew rational arguments for symbols and imagery playing directly to our
The goal of documentary photographers was to promote photography to a mean capable of creating an exemplary record as a camera provided the ability to represent reality and the solid facts in an objective, unaltered manner. Pictorialists, on the other hand, regarded the sharpness and the clarity of the image as a limitation that inhibits the artistic and a self-expression. They employed the manipulation of the photographic prints as a means to express individuality. They held and believed that photographs are and should be regarded as art and treated as such by the artistic establishment.
In order to win the race, brands sometimes exaggerate the result of their product to win more customers by using external tools or software. In the digital world everything can be done to a photo, and sometimes it changes the meaning of the image. In many areas of advertising (such as the fashion beauty world, health, fitness, diet pills, cos...
Photography is a mindful medium of expression, perspective, interpretation and can sometimes be truth. The changes throughout the history of photography have changed how people see the image they're looking at. In the 19th century, they were no editing options or software of any kind. You just go through the process and take the photo and people could easily tell it was real. Of course it would a shock to see what was once a real life event in that time period, but then transferred on paper "capturing" the moment itself. The truth could easily been seen, now in the 21st century, most of that has changed. There are
What do you consider art? Paintings, sculptures, drawings, or maybe something else. I know, when I think of art, I think of photography. Photography Is used for business, science, manufacturing, art, recreational purposes, mass communication, and more. Photography is using light to do amazing things, and some people think of photography as a story that just needs to be told. Ansel Adams probably believed this. He said, “You don’t take a photograph, you make it.” Photography has a long interesting history, like the fact that the word photography is made up of two greek words, photos meaning ‘light’ and graphein which is ‘to draw’ ! Photography also has some complicated techniques to get a hang of taking good photos. Have you heard of the rule of thirds? Or do you know how a camera works? Well, that will all be explained. Maybe, by the end you will take up photography too. This essay will explore the history and types of cameras and the basic rules for taking photographs.
As technology advances, more and more images spread throughout the world quicker than ever before. A single search on Google presents millions of pictures at our fingertips. However, these easily accessible images do not enhance our understanding of the world. Rather, they limit our understanding while fooling us into thinking we are learning. Images “makes us feel like the world is more available than it really is.”
Photography is relatively simple in comparison to painting, which is a much more complex task. With photography, the composition is already completely arranged, but with a painting the objective is much more open to interpretation by the artist. The artist has the ability to capture much more emotion, understanding, and significance in an event and apply this fiery drive to his paintbrush when creating his own masterpiece.
Art is everywhere whether one likes it or not, and can be appreciated in the smallest of ways. It’s absolutely necessary for the growth of a society and its people. It’s mainly used for businesses today to either raise people’s opinions of their company or sell a product. For example if you go to the marketplace and you pick up a gallon of milk the first thing you may see on that gallon is a picture of a cow or the same milk being poured into a glass in a way that captures the eye and makes you think “wow that looks great!” This is the most common use for visual art today and often makes people “miss the point” of what it truly means (Why Art Matters, 1). Advertisement is one of the biggest fields in then visual arts and shapes the way we see a product as well as the choices we make on such judgment. This is where the illusion comes in making the visual arts, a potentially harmful thing. The illusion of it comes from what’s true and what’s made up or “altered truth”. A company could make their product seem way better than it really is essentially tricking people into buying it. One example is when you go to a fast food restaurant and you see signs of perfect looking sandwiches when in reality they don’t look like that. Most people don’t see any illusion but when they do it’s hard for them to see the other side of things, the ones that aren’t “stretching the truth”. People today tend to see that kind of advertisement as normal. In fact, it kind of helps with things like morale by making things seem much more worth it and just all around nicer. So there for the arts are the very “soul” of a successful business.