Importance Of Double Visualism In Film

745 Words2 Pages

Double visuality the presence of painting in film:

British film maker Derek Jarman studied painting at the Slade School of Art in London.

Caravaggio is a compelling portrait of genius as problematic existence

We see Caravaggios most famous paintings - following attributions by recent art history - created before our eyes as the models pose for the artist. Painting turns into cinematic narrative; we see the making of death of the virgin (1605-1606, Louvre) and other works while the strenuous task of being an artists model is realistically highlighted.

A painter himself, Jarman's film is its own work of art--a personal portrait of an artist, a rebel--and a man in love. He makes effective use of bold imagery: a snake on a basket, shadows on a wall and any scene that brings Caravaggio's paintings to life, and uses sound to suggest grander surroundings.

The first Tableau vivant is ‘Baccus’ (1595) posed by Dexter Fletcher in his first scene as the youthful Caravaggio,

Sean Bean character Renuccio is introduced at the same time as Gary Cooper who plays Davide, both actors at the beginning of their careers,
The masters of cinematography where the greatest followers of Caravaggio and Rembrandt in using chiaroscuro, for they knew how to manipulate the light to be able to separate the background from the foreground, colour chroma helps to do this, but in the days of black and white ...
Techniques of black and white films, helps celebrate Caravagio’s use of lighting, but also reveals the texture of the background, the result is a convincing and alluring set which reads very clearly on camera.

All these subtle gestures are meticulously considered by Jarman to situate the audience inside the paintings of Caravaggio.

Evocative and...

... middle of paper ...

...ted, that it throws a new light on the original. It is perhaps to the extent that the film is a complete work and as such, seems therefore to betray the painting most, that it renders it in reality the greater service.(bazin, 1967:168)
“It is not possible to look at works through the eyes of the past, only the present, and no one coming to Michelangelo or Shakespeare should ignore this unveiling. Civilization is same sex.” (Jarman, Smiling in Slow Motion:176)
“its difficult to know how the seventeenth century understood physical homosexuality... The laws of the church certainly forbade what is called ‘sodomy’... The term ‘homosexual’ which identifies and ostracizes a group becuase of their desires and inclinations, is a nineteenth-century clinical invention, c.1860.” - (Jarman, dancing ledge:21) -Screening Early Modern Drama: Beyond Shakespeare, By Pascale Aebischer.

Open Document