Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational chart analysis
Principles of management credited to Henri Fayol
Principles of management credited to Henri Fayol
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational chart analysis
ORGANIZATION: ITS IMPORTANCE AND ASPECTS.
There exist at least three aspects to an organization: the chart, authority, and the chain of command – all of which are interconnected with one another. The organizational chart is known as “the usual way of depicting an organization” (Dessler, 2003, p. 139). Oxford Dictionary (2001) states that authority, in its simplest definition, is the “power or right to enforce obedience” (p. 50). Finally, chain of command, in essence, is a series of executive positions in order of authority ("Chain of command", n.d.). In essence, the essay will give details on the importance of line and staff authority, knowing why it’s important that delegation should equal responsibility, and the differences between a mechanistic
…show more content…
They are authorized to make orders to subordinates down the chain of command (Dessler, 2003, p. 140). On the other hand, the staff manager is a manager who only has authority on their specific department, meaning, they cannot give orders down the chain of command. There is an exception to this, however, because a staff manager may also have functional authority and it means that they can issue orders down the chain of command within their limitations of authority. All in all, line managers still are the ones who can give orders outside of the specific department. The most common line position is the CEO or Chief Executive Officer whilst the common staff position is the marketing research manager. In the end, in an organization, no matter what the position is, there is a level of responsibility to uphold. This is one of the principles of management given by Henri Fayol in his book, “General and Industrial Management” (Dessler, 2003, p. …show more content…
In an organization, there exist two different types: mechanistic which is structured by close adherence to the chain of command and organic is the opposite of the mechanistic in that “it’s structured for speed, not efficiency” (Dessler, 2003, pp. 169-170). The line of authority makes it clear how divided the mechanistic organization and the organic one are. The line of authority in a mechanistic context is more organized, but on the other hand, the line of authority in an organic structure, it’s less organic; the jobs of those employees would be changed frequently since it is not clear as to what the line of authority
The chain of command is the line of authority that extends from the highest to the lowest levels of the organization.
Secondly, CP should incorporate a more flexible environment using an organic structure while incorporating a horizontal approach that will allow them to delegate authority and responsibility. The organic structure would require CP to “depend heavily on an informal structure of employee networks. Astute managers are keenly aware of these interactions, and they encourage employees to work more as teammates than as subordinates who take orders from the boss”
Marriottt's organizational structure subordinates in each department will take orders from the manager of that particular department,
Hierarchy of authority. The chain of command is another way to define the hierarchy of authority as these terms describe the structure of authority within an organization (Daft, 2016, p.144). Specifically, the hierarchy of authority concerns
...tional. The distribution of authority entitled in different levels of leadership is an indispensable and fundamental key stone, which enables the Army to address in most efficient manner the issues that the Army encounters.
Position power which refers to the amount of authority of a manager (Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003).
Chain of Command – This establishes the level of authority from the bottom to the top within the organization and the level of authority each managerial position will hold. Additionally, the chain of command will outline the reporting process.
Bass, 1990, explains that the word ‘‘leadership’’ was initially used to explain political influence and control of the British Parliament in the 1800s. He further elaborates that leadership was based on heritage and appointment and used to take place often in Anglo-Saxon countries (Bass, 1990, p. 11). Katz and Kahn, 1966, p.334 expands that leadership is to acknowledge the skill to influence others on organisational relevance. Michener et al. (1990) described leadership ‘‘as a process that takes place in groups in which one member influences and controls the behaviour of the other members towards some common goal’’ (cited in Denmark, 1993, p. 343), signifying that the control of employees was a required aspect of effective leadership. The assumption therefore is that if someone is to lead, he should extend beyond influence. This comprises motivation and helping others to accomplish the goals of the organisation.
Usually, the belief is that the managers, administrators, presidents or even the supervisors, have the greatest source of power, because they are at the top of the ladder in the hierarchy of the organization. The reality is that they need
In a bureaucratic system, communication and policies flow down to employees as directives. To better understand the hierarchy of such organization we must look at what it entails. A bureaucratic management system is a centralized, rigid system that contains parts of a military structure, whereas, employees are armed, wear uniforms, badges, patches and other items (Stohr & Collins, 2014).
These requirements are intended to lead the organization to its fullest potential. The autocratic leader that make all the decisions is necessary for an organization such as an orchestra. Think of how an orchestra would sound if they utilized another form of leadership. Each instrument would fail to be precisely orchestrated with the others, the resulting music would be very difficult to listen to. The most important aspect of the autocratic leader is that this leader must always be leading and their followers must be willing to abide to the leaders authority. The consultative leader is willing to hear the perspective of others. After seeking the opinions of the followers the consultative leader then makes a decision. This type of leadership gives the followers a chance to be heard. Most importantly it gives the leader a chance to get to know the followers and to hear their opinions on how the organization should carry on their business. The final decision remains with leader. The participative leader is utilized for teams, the decision making power is a team effort. The leader will make decisions if team is unable to come to a consensus. The importance of this type of leadership is, that it gives each member of the team “ownership”, this can improve the morale. The free-rein leader gives the guidelines and the followers are free to choose how to accomplish the end goal. The most important aspect of this
She conveys that business administration should avoid troublesome internalization by using an integrative technique. Unfortunately, Follett does not elaborate further on the context of what might this integration method appear to be. She changes the direction of her focus back onto the preparation of giving orders. Now, giving orders is a significant component to management but Follett should have provided additional information revolving the integration of management and the giving of orders. Fairholm suggests, “they misunderstand the evolving nature of authority derived from changing social structures, and because they have missed opportunities to tie in research procedures and focuses from intellectual interests such as psychology, sociology, history, and political science, not just scientific management, Weberian bureaucracy, and the like.” (Fairholm. 2004). Follett provides psychological perspectives, however maybe she misunderstands other perspectives, why further development is needed for her to examine. Follett later admits there is additional psychological, learning about the development of habits and the preventative measures of giving orders greatly surpasses than what she can explain in this article. It would be interesting if, she has examined and considered other theories and philosophies surrounding giving orders and
Similarly in Weber’s bureaucratic approach, organizations are divided into different echelons with each varying in its degrees of influence. Each unit being commanded by the one above it, a system that promotes stability and has a predictable line of communication. Both approaches of management rely heavily on regulated control. Whether governing task scientifically of people authoritatively. A solid form of control is mus...
When power becomes legitimate, it is then recognized as authority (Denhardt et al, 2001). Power becomes authority when it is accepted and even desired by society. As stated by the course study notes, “authority refers to a situation where a person (or group) has been formally granted a leadership position”. An individual has authority when everyday norms and regulations support the exercising of power by that individual. In an organizational setting, “authority is hierarchal and vested in positions” (Week 9 Study Notes), which are defined by “organizational charts, positions and rules” (Week 9 Study Notes). Generally, power in authority also involves the possibility of rewards such as promotions and good performance reviews.
Max Weber, Henri Fayol and Luther Halsey Gulick all addressed issues, concerning how an overall organization should be structured, bureaucratic administration, while Frederick Taylor’s theory of scientific management concentrated on techniques for increasing production (Tomkins, 2005). This essay will focus on the disadvantages and the advantages, including the effective and efficient components, of bureaucracy in public management.