Hr 3040 Case Study

754 Words2 Pages

Discussion H.R. 3040 aim to alleviate the decline in the pollinator population in North America by protecting and ensuring the viability of native bees and other pollinators. Economically, an evaluation of potential success of H.R. 3040 focuses on direct public action, market efficiency, and how negative productive externalities are affecting the market. By implementing a policy that bans the registration of neonicotinoids, policy makers aspire to return pollinator populations to normal levels through recovery through direct public action, specifically through a command-and-control policy. Due to varying opinions and sometimes misinterpreted literature, pest management has proven to be difficult and complex. Having to take into account a large number of input and output factors has limited the research conducted, though a clear link between neonicotinoid use and pollinator survival has been uncovered, debate still thrives on how to manage the use of such chemicals on crops and other applications. …show more content…

Much of the misunderstandings are in part by imperfect information which is currently resulting in even further destruction of pollinator populations. Supply is shrinking while demand increases as the need for food increases across the globe. These inefficiencies are creating a stressful environment for various agencies starting at the farmer level, agency level, and ultimately on the consumer level. Agriculture imposes negative externalities upon society in this case through the use of pesticides and biodiversity loss. This bill will reduce those specific externalities by imposing a regulation that will alter their traditional way of farming. The imposed bill will force farmers and other neonicotinoid users to comply with a pesticide free way of farming or growing other

More about Hr 3040 Case Study

Open Document