In the year of 1919, a crowd of 379 nonviolent protesters were murdered by British Indian Army troops. These protestors were killed because they were Indian. Racism was already existent in many countries that were colonized by Britain. Gandhi, a social reformer came to a realization that Indians deserve equal rights and that such acts were in humane and unacceptable. So what made Gandhi’s peaceful movement such a success? It was his civil disobedience practice, which he reached through nonviolent protests, embracing the enemy, and accepting jail time. You cannot fight the enemy in order to restore peace. Gandhi practiced nonviolent protest in civil disobedience which was the refusal to contribute to certain laws or to pay taxes in a peaceful protest. He applied this method to his life and effectively got his message across. “I cannot intentionally hurt anything that lives… even though they may do the greatest wrong to me and mine.”- Gandhi (Doc A). This displayed great disobedience and strength that most could not obtain to their lifestyle. “The Western mind finds it difficult to grasp the idea of nonresistance.”- The Dharasana Salt Works, Mme Naidu (Doc B). The Western culture clearly did not …show more content…
Accepting jail time encouraged his people to change their defenses in a nonviolent way. Gandhi talked about how he did not go into jail to experience misery and pettiness, but instead to spread his message. It was a way for him to spread his message of peace and understandment especially to those who were being treated poorly. “Everyone was firm in his resolution of passing his term in jail in perfect happiness and peace”- Mme Naidu (Doc B). Maintaining the mindset of peace and optimism in prison was extremely effective in the success of Gandhi’s non-violent movement during his time in prison. His arrest wasn’t fair, but he used it as a learning and growing
...y shocks most of people who hear and see it, encouraging and moving others who also suffer. In instance, Elena screamed at Longoria to show she would not give them any information about resistances and Antonio when Longoria was about to killing her (Tobar 148). Elena sacrificed her life to protect Antonio and her friends who fought against the Guatemalan government without using any violence when she faced Longoria who tried to kill her. She showed it was important not to be daunted by fear and to keep fighting for justice. Mohandas Karamachand Gandhi advocated nonviolent resistance as a means of seeking peace and gaining independence for the Republic of India from Britain. Justice should be served by means in the name of justice. Nonviolent resistance is a powerful way to fight against the cycle of violence and work towards the realization of a peaceful world.
When you are fight to get peace and fairness back to your government, does it involve nonviolent or violent acts to get what you want? When Gandhi came back to India after getting his law degree, Gandhi started a movement to bring peace and fairness back to their government. What made Gandhi’s nonviolent movement work? The reason Gandhi’s nonviolent movement worked was because he didn’t believe in segregation, didn’t follow the British’s rules for Indians, went to jail for his movement, and he was determined.
Nowadays, this concept of using nonviolence is hard to achieve. This is because people think that peaceful protest aren’t effective compared to taking action with their hands. One example is the Blacks Lives Matter Movement. Although there are peaceful protest, there are times when people turn violent against police. This can be counterintuitive since watching these harsh actions by protestors, people start forming negative views about the organization. This leads to people not supporting the cause anymore. Without the support of the public, an organization can’t
Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.
Violence Is Never the Answer In the 1960s, the African-American Civil Rights Movement in the United States was at its peak. At the forefront of this crusade were two inspiring and insightful men, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Malcolm X. Although their philosophies were different, both had the same aspiration, to achieve social and racial justice by initiating change in the American people throughout the nation. Dr. King, a prominent civil rights leader, based his philosophy of change through nonviolence on the beliefs and tactics of Mahatma Gandhi. The intention of this was to allow violent oppressors to reveal to themselves and everyone around the world the moral and legal corruption that is racial injustice and inequality.
Despite the belief that fighting with violence is effective, civil disobedience has been tried throughout history and been successful. Fighting violence with violence leaves no oppertunity for peace to work. By refusing to fight back violently, Martin Luther King Jr. took a race of people, taught them the value of their voice, and they earned the right to vote. Henry David Thoreau presented his doctrine that no man should cooperate with laws that are unjust, but, he must be willing to accept the punishment society sets for breaking those laws, and hundreds of years later, people are still inspired by his words. Mohandas K. Gandhi lead an entire country to its freedom, using only his morals and faith to guide him, as well as those who followed him, proving that one man can make a difference. Civil disobedience is the single tool that any person can use to fight for what they want, and they will be heard. After centuries of questioning it, it appears that the pen truly is mightier than the sword.
Throughout the years, Gandhi has been an inspiration to many people for his peaceful methods to create change. Gandhi had many different ways that he would fight for this. He was determined to keeping all of his acts free of any violence. Gandhi held marches and protests, wrote letters, and made public speeches. However which one of his methods turned out the most useful in the favor of India? His most successful, nonviolent tactic was his marches.
...able to showcase the great power that nonviolence could have on the world and how by using methods such as that one would be more successful than if one used violence. As Mahatma Gandhi once said “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.”
It has been debated though out history whether or not nonviolence “works”. Many societies, and this without question includes the United States, have mostly relied on violent tactics. Many people believe that violence is the only way to stop wars, even though it creates war, and people tend to believe that violence is the one solution to many global and political problems. However, recent literature and research is starting to prove otherwise. Erica Chenoweth, a political scientist, recently published a book, Why Civil Resistance Works in 2011. The research highlights data that shows throughout history, nonviolent tactics are more effective than violent ones in various ways.
After spending a night in jail for his tax evasion, he became inspired to write “Civil Disobedience.” In this essay, he discusses the importance of detaching one’s self from the State and the power it holds over its people, by refraining from paying taxes and putting money into the government. The idea of allowing one’s self to be arrested in order to withhold one’s own values, rather than blindly following the mandates of the government, has inspired other civil rights activists throughout history, such as Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King , Jr. Both these men fought against unjust laws, using non-violent, yet effective, methods of protest.
Throughout his education, Martin Luther King Jr. tried to find a way to demonstrate his belief of racial equality with the most effective means possible. He quickly realized that the best strategy to end segregation was to use nonviolent forms of protest. At Crozer, Morehouse and Boston University, he studied the teaching of Mohandas Gandhi, who used nonviolent methods to help India claim its independence from Britain. King read several books on the ideas of Gandhi, and eventually became convinced that his methods could be employed by African Americans to obtain equality in America. King knew that any violence on the part of African Americans would lead to violent responses from segregationists, which would lead to injury or maybe even death for his followers. He had to teach his followers not to respond violently to cruel attacks from segregationists. King decided to sponsor workshops to train African Americans in nonviolent beh...
Gandhi, King, and Mandela, all of them achieved peace through a new tactic that nobody believed would work. However, it did in fact work and that tactic is known as nonviolent resistance. Although many believed that nonviolence would never work, it worked due to nonviolence showing the conviction of the protestors, it painting the aggressors in a bad light, and it gained a massive amount of support from a lot of people.
Throughout history there have been many racial injustices. A great example is when the British ruled over India. Indians were seen as an inferior race and had many restrictions. Moreover, the Indians got tired of being poppets to the British and started fighting for their freedom. Their leader was Mahatma Gandhi. One of the most motivational speeches Gandhi delivered was “Quit India”. The speech was very powerful and caused many Indians to join Gandhi’s cause to set India free from imperialism for once and for all. With his speech Gandhi was able to unite many people despite their differences in religion. Gandhi was also able to diminish the hatred that many Indians felt towards the British, and promoted nonviolent civil disobedience. Although racial discriminations have diminished a great deal since
Gandhi and King both agreed that nonviolence is accomplished by revolutionizing the relationship between adversaries, and that its strength lies in their commitment to justice. However, Gandhi puts emphasis on a need for personal suffering in the practice of nonviolence, a stance that is somewhat less aggressive than
Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.