Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare metternich and bismarck
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare metternich and bismarck
Klemens Von Metternich and Otto Von Bismarck Both conservative in their Foreign Policy’s made achievements that helped lead to a more modern Europe that we know of today. Even though they had different goals of what Europe should be, rather it having an equal balance of power, or Germany having the absolute rule, they had the same great overall goal of making Europe a better place. In the end, their foreign Policies, both different and alike in many ways, made a lasting impact on Europe.
The biggest similarity I believe that Metternich and Bismarck shared was their political views of being conservative, and not one bit radical. One of Metternich’s hopes was to convert the tsar, Alexander to a firm conservatism (91). He wanted to keep and maintain
…show more content…
The Fall of Metternich happened because of Louis Kossuth’s speech on liberty. Since the government put together by Metternich fell apart so easily it proved that it was weak (126). This thrilled people throughout the Austrian Empire especially in Germany. The Frankfurt Assembly was made possible by the collapse of the German governments during the March Days all because of Metternich’s weak government and how easy it was collapsed. The assembly ended up failing in unifying Germany because king of Prussia refused the offer to rule them. Even though it was a failure this was an experience that made the German people develop even more nationalism and want to unify that much more. In 1867, Bismarck suggested that the German confederation change to a more democratic system (163-164). He produced a new constitution called the North German confederation. He basically pretended to be democratic to weaken Austria’s chance of unifying with Germany. What he wrote was just to appease the German people so that they would like him. What he gave them was a false sense of a democracy, and the participation they would have in their government. He also eventually helped in the actual unification of the German States. He made peace between France and Germany in the treaty of Frankfurt and no sooner than 3 wars later he successfully united the German States …show more content…
Metternich wanted a balance of power for all of the different countries. He didn't want any nation state stronger than the other. For example the point of the Congress of Vienna was to return peace and resize certain states so that they would not have more power than any other ones. He believed that balancing the power would produce a lasting peace that was establish (442). Bismarck wanted the complete opposite, he believed in having Germany as the main power and actually broke up a lot of what the Congress of Vienna had made. Bismarck edged on wars with other nations. In one instance he published an EMS telegram from the King of Prussia so he could provoke war between France and Prussia (166). Later on he became obsessed with gaining power and land through the Austrian Prussian war, since he dominated France, Italy, and Russia during this war. He wanted a united superpower and thats what he got by the year of 1871
Bismarck believed that Germany should be united under Prussian leadership and that Austria should have nothing to do with Germany. Bismarck was chosen as chancellor by the Prussian king as he had a proven record as a monarchist and had little time for liberal and excessive parliamentary ideas. Bismarck helped his long term plan to unite Germany and to be the ruler by getting in a strong position with the king. The king owned Bismarck a 'favour´ as Bismarck had solved the king´s constitutional crisis. Bismarck played a crucial part in the unification of Germany as he helped to set up the Northern German Confederation after defeating Austria in the second of three wars.
In conclusion, there were many reasons the Weimar Republic failed, firstly due to the treaty of Versailles, where the Weimar Republic was blamed for everything that happened as a result. This then caused a lack of trust and the German people began to question their government during the period of hyperinflation and their economic crisis. The Garman people found the Nazis and slowly voted them into Government. Hitler took advantage of Germany while it was vulnerable and he succeeded using clever tactics. For the people of Germany it was certain that there was no way of overcoming the events that took place, which eventually led to the collapse of the Weimar.
Other arguments suggest that proportional representation encouraged spl... ... middle of paper ... ... rather than making the changes necessary to sure up the economy. Increased inflation over the years did nothing to reinstate the people's faith in democracy. The main reason the constitution failed was not because the document itself was flawed but because the German people were not ready or prepared to make such a sudden change from autocracy to democracy.
(Versaware, 1999, p.1) (Chastain, 1998, p.1) (World Book, 1999, p. 381)(Richards, 1977, p.139-143)(Compton's Encyclopedia, 1999, p.1) This is when Bismarck, a beneficiary of good fortunes, set his own designs for Prussia into motion (Encyclopedia Britannica, 1994, p.3) Otto von Bismarck , during the course of 1860-1862, benefitted from some unpredictable circumstances. "That same year [1862] a bitter dispute between the Prussian government and Parliament over the size of the army reached an impasses.
In the late 1800s, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck used different strategical plans in order to gain as much power possible, the majority of the plans consisted of him taking advantage of the different political parties. Bismarck used many traditional political strategies in order to gain the power he craved for, such as creating harsh laws and prohibiting certain beliefs or ideas. Unfortunately, these strategies did not satisfy the people, so Bismarck later started to increase the welfare of the working class, apologized to the Socialists, and did much more to obtain more political strength which eventually created a new conservatism. In an effort to increase political power for the Kaiser, Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck uses liberal and traditional
The controversies surrounding his life still go on between historians today. He is portrayed as a destroyer of liberty and also as a compromiser of liberalism. Some see Bismarck as trying to preserve the old order of Europe. Bismarck worked against liberal plans for unification of Germany but stood proudly in the Hall of Mirrors in Versailles as the German Empire he helped to create was proclaimed. Bismarck as man and as statesman has been a point of interests for many history scholars’ interpretations. Bismarck’s empire lasted only 20 years after him. Bismarck believed that armed force was necessary in relations among governments – Blood and Iron his methods. Through three successful wars Bismarck united Germany. With the creation of the 2nd German Reich Germany become the strongest nation on the continent. After the union of the German states Bismarck became an outspoken activist for peace on the continent. Bismarck never succumbed to the temptation of conquest. Bismarck led the German people to empire but is criticized by not training the nation in self-governing. Bismarck never talked about racial supremacy or unlimited conquest. He believed in a balance of power resting upon the existence of strong nation states.
He brought in the Carlsbad Decree, banning the teaching of nationalism and liberalism. Lecturers were expelled for teaching nationalism and students were not allowed to talk about liberal and nationalist ideas. On the other hand, the second most powerful Germanic state, Prussia was open to the idea of liberalism and nationalism. Prussia welcomed the idea of one German nation. Other states grew closer to Prussia and an economic union called Zollverein was created that did included Austria in it. This economic union allowed Prussia to improve its economic situation and its military. An attempt to unify Germany was made in 1848, which ended up in a partial failure. The 1848 attempt made it clear that the German’s wanted Germany without Austria. The attempt was partially a failure because Prussian king did not take the title of German Emperor since the commoners were giving it and it made the Prussian King feel
He was not, however, hell-bent on provoking a war with Austria. War was always one effective solution, but Bismarck regarded it as a last resort to be used only when all other options had been exhaus... ... middle of paper ... ... it was not something, which he could have planned or predicted. It is impossible to explain the process of German unification without emphasising the role played by Bismarck.
Research will be drawn from many sources including several historical studies and online articles. The sources used revolve around Bismarck's attitudes and actions toward German unification and general policy. Sources include works by historians A.J.P. Taylor and James Wycliffe Headlam. The policies of Bismarck during the interwar period were researched as well, through several scholastic journals and written works.
The Weimar constitution was forced into creation by the German desire to sign an armistace with the Allied forces after significant defeats on the Western front. Not only were the Allies demanding a democratic governing style in Germany, but there was also a strong desire to move away from the autocratic state that had existed under the Kaiser. Although the new constitution outwardly appeared to be democratic, there were several internal factors that severely undermined the democratic integrity of the new constitution, and made it almost indistinguishable from its autocratic predecessor.
He believed that the Germans were the 'master race'. Going around saying this will make people feel inferior and think the Germans have no authority over them, this caused conflicts. Hitler thought that the Treaty of Versailles should be cancelled and land taken from Germany must be returned. This led to problems as they were demanding land, which not only is against the Treaty's wishes, but will make then a lot stronger when or if future wars do happen. He said that all people of German blood, including many in Austria and Czechoslovakia, must be allowed to live in Greater Germany.
Germany, for a better part of its history, had been home to around 40 free cities and city-states controlling the area between France and Russia. Attempts at unifying these separate but connected states have been made quite often and often with the same results: failure. Those in control of these cities and states knew that a unified German empire would have no need of all these princes and kings, and so many obstacles blocked the path to unification. Another issue facing unification was the split “ownership” of Germany between Prussia and Austria, two nations that had helped join the cities and states into a loose confederation.
From the 1790s to 1814 French troops successively conquered and occupied the area that later constituted the German Empire. French domination helped to modernize and consolidate Germany and -- toward the end -- sparked the first upsurge of German nationalism. In different ways the French emperor Napoleon I helped German unification. It was important that he encouraged many of the middle-sized German states to absorb huge numbers of small independent territories, mostly bishoprics, church lands, and local principalities.
Bismarck's Foreign Policy „Versuche zu Dreien zu sein, solange die Welt durch das un sunny“ Gleichweighed the five Großmächten bestimmt! “ This was the general formula of Bismarck’s foreign policies meaning “When there are. five great powers be one of three. “ The five great powers at that time. were France, England, Russia, Austria-Hungary and the new United States.
... These three wars achieved Bismarck’s goals of obtaining support for the army reforms and unifying Germany under Prussian leadership (which meant the expulsion of Austria from Germany’s affairs). So, the unification of Germany in 1871 was achieved through a combination of factors: the idea held by the German people of a unified nation (nationalism), the fear held by the German aristocracy of anything which may result in a reduction to their power, such as liberalism and the ‘Napoleonic Fear’, the Prussian King William the first whose most important roles were appointing Bismarck and the introduction of the army reforms, and of course, Otto Von Bismarck. Bismarck was the reason for the three wars against Austria, France and Denmark, the implication of the Prussian army reforms and he made sure that the German states finally unified under the rule of a Prussian monarch, or ‘German Kaiser’, ruler of the newly founded German Empire in 1871.