How Is Holden Caulfield Unreliable

457 Words1 Page

Holden Caulfield is the first-person narrator in J.D. Salinger’s novel, Catcher in the Rye. Holden is often classified as being an unreliable narrator. An unreliable narrator is a character whose telling of the story is not completely accurate or credible due to problems with the character's mental state or maturity. In the novel, Caulfield’s immaturity and pessimistic attitude towards the world prevents him from giving accurate details. Many of Holden’s viewpoints contradict themselves because of his own confusion. After Stradlater hits Holden he admits, “All that blood and all sort of made me look tough. I'd only been in in about two fights in my life, and I lost both of them. I'm not too tough. I'm a pacifist, if you want to know the truth(45)".Even though Holden characterizes himself as a pacifist, he contradicts himself because he enjoys getting beat up. The author uses these contradictions to show how unreliable Holden is. …show more content…

On one hand, he is very open about his emotional instability by admitting he broke the windows, but other times the reader can infer that he’s not being truthful. "Why not? Why the hell not? Stop screaming at me, please," she said. Which was crap, because I wasn't even screaming at her(132). Sometimes when Holden speaks he becomes zealous, and starts to lose control of his emotions. Holden is unable to comprehend the effect he has on others when he loses control. This is one of the many examples of Holden being an unreliable

Open Document