How Does Huxley Use Satire In Brave New World

705 Words2 Pages

Aldous Huxley was a living anachronism, writing literature about a currently nonexistant dystopian world. At the time of its release in 1932 the concept seemed just a bit far fetched (even after World War I), but when World War II rolled around the corner Huxley’s one-world, eugenic riddled story became plausible. Years later in a world filled with valium, legalized marijuana, open and celebrated promiscuity, a nearly one world language, and technology galore Huxley’s utopia feels closer and closer. In Brave New World, Alfdous Huxley creates a frightening world of satire to discuss the worlds resemblance to a haunting dystopia. He does this with symbolic characters, allusions and a setting that jabs at the automation of the modern world, and …show more content…

Bernard doesn't quite fit the picture of perfection that Alphas in the Brave New World are embody. He’s small for an Alpha (the result of an accident with the alcohol in his blood-surrogate), uninterested in soma or promiscuity, and freethinking; as a result he is looked down upon, leaving him angry and jealous. Fanny describes him to Lenina as “ugly” and “so small” with a “grimace” because “smallness was so horribly and typically low caste” (BNW, 46). Being treated like an outsider leaves Bernard, not only angry and jealous, but because of his free thoughts feeling superior. While talking to some Delta Minus attendants Bernard is described as giving his “orders in [a] sharp, rather arrogant and even offensive tone of one who does not feel himself too secure in his superiority” (BNW, 64). Bernard’s differences allow him to view himself as an individual, giving human emotions to a Brave New Worlder for the first time in the story. The only person Marx can relate to is Helmholtz Watson, a fellow Alpha with physical defects, but even Watson looks down on Bernard. Huxley uses the journey of Marx’s character from outsider to celebrity to illustrate the effects of a suffocating societal pressure to conform to the social norm. Initially a freethinking, rebellious hero, Bernard makes a complete transformation once he is accepted, ending up …show more content…

He is not considered by those on the reservation as one of them so he is rejected. He has already been rejected by the “civilized” world, making him a complete outsider. This scene marks the point in which the protagonast shifts from Bernard to John (SparkNotes Editors, Analysis of Major Characters- John). Huxley makes the first encounter with John a rejection to set the tone for his rest of the story, as well as give an indication for how John has been treated his before he encounters Bernard and the “civilized” world. Being the grey area in a black and white world of “civilized” and “savage”, John serves as a reminder of the concepts and beliefs of the “old world.” John remains connected to the old world through a worn copy of Shakespeare’s The Tempest, taking his conduct from the book and using it as a tool to criticize the State. Shakespeare embodies all the values lost in the new world state and John serves as a “Shakespearen character in a world where poetry that does not sell a product is prohibited” (SparkNotes Editors, Analysis of Major Characters- John). The ironic use of a Shakespearean phrase as the title helps display the apparent lost value of “civilization” and Huxley uses Shakespeare (John) as the foil to illustrate this throughout the story (Frost, 456). John’s naive romanticism and idealism, learned from Othello, points out the

Open Document