More handpicked essays just for you.
A Letter to Lord Chesterfield analysis
A Letter to Lord Chesterfield analysis
A Letter to Lord Chesterfield analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lord Chesterfield, in his letter, illustrates advice intended for his son about important life decisions while the boy is traveling overseas. Chesterfield employs a wise and protective tone to appeal to his son, all in hopes that he will regard his advice. By using constructive diction, contrasting opinions, and a passive tone. Chesterfield reveals his own values to his son through a loving atmosphere and accomplishes his goal in providing a guiding manual for his son to follow. In order to appeal to his son, Chesterfield chooses his words extremely carefully so that his son might pay attention to what he has to say. His overlaying sense of care and concern for his son is expressed through loving diction. Chesterfield addresses his son by …show more content…
While advising his son Chesterfield tells him, “Do not think that I mean to dictate as a parent; I only mean to advise as a friend.” The first sentence creates a harsh and final tone that gives no room for a child to express his own beliefs while the second sentence is more careful and understanding that a child must make his own mistakes. Chesterfield explains to his son that he knows he must make his own decisions but that, as a father, he is available to guide him in the right direction. By defining his standing point as a friend, Chesterfield’s son will be more willing to listen to his father because he has more room to have free will. If Chesterfield had just stated that he was advising as a friend and had not included the first explanation, he would have lost the opposing view and his son would not have seen how bad his father could have controlled him. Later in his letter, Chesterfield also explains the vitality of attention and application in learning by saying he does not, “mention them as duties; but points them out as conducive, nay, absolutely necessary to pleasures.” Again, Chesterfield is seen pointing out what could have been said to contrast what he says to what other’s might say. By providing contrasting ideas, Chesterfield makes the reader pay more attention to the thing that he does do, not to the thing he does not do. By refuting one thing, Chesterfield …show more content…
Chesterfield addresses his son first by saying, “I know that those who want it most, like it and follow it least; and I know, too, that the advice of parents is ascribed to the moroseness, the imperiousness and the garrulity of old age.” By demonstrating all the information he knows, Chesterfield sets up the letter to be countered. Even though he knows all these things that conclude a son will not listen to his father, he wants his son to listen anyway. This idea conveys a certain importance to what Chesterfield has to say. Chesterfield dismisses all doubt and argument against his advice right away by metaphorically saying “listen to me anyway.” Later Chesterfield acknowledges his son by saying, “I am convinced that you will act right: I mean, for the sake of doing right, and out of affection and gratitude to me.” Chesterfield qualifies his son’s actions and explains his expectations for his son through a passive and sarcastic tone. Instead of directly telling his son to act appropriately or else he will be punished, Chesterfield explains to his son that he hopes he will act right for the good of acting right. This again gives Chesterfield’s son room to express himself and not just follow orders like a robot which provides a better chance for his son to listen to him. By indirectly telling his son that he owes him for all the advice he has given him, Chesterfield uses guilt to persuade his son into
The chapter “A Fathers Influence” is constructed with several techniques including selection of detail, choice of language, characterization, structure and writers point of view to reveal Blackburn’s values of social acceptance, parenting, family love, and a father’s influence. Consequently revealing her attitude that a child’s upbringing and there parents influence alter the characterization of a child significantly.
However The great majority of parents are often cryptic in these necessary lessons while still others try to build a protective shield around their children. Do they really believe this is to the benefit of our youth? It is understandable to want to protect children from unnecessary evils, but sometimes in constructing walls around their worldly vision they are in all actuality cutting their children off from reality. It is so much healthier and helpful to confront these issues head-on, rather than trying to skirt around them. & Juliet" by the students, such avoidance of the matter at hand will often prove more harmful in the development of young minds. Through the various misconceptions of the children in her short story, "The Brother in Vietnam," Maxine Hong Kingston allows her readers to see just how necessary truth is to the vulnerable minds of our youth.
In the “Letter to her Son” Abigail Adams uses diction, tone, and style to author a loving and warm hearted letter to her son, John Quincy Adams, in order to encourage him to improve and possess honorable qualities.
For it is a commonplace of our understanding of the period that the Victorian writer wanted above all to “stay in touch.” Comparing his situation with that of his immediate predecessors, he recognized that indulgence in a self-centered idealism was no longer viable in a society which ever more insistently urged total involvement in its occupations. The world was waiting to be improved upon, and solved, and everyone, poets, included had to busy themsel...
He uses his personal experiences from his situation to back up his argument and show the brutality of the police force. King uses anaphora in the multiple use of the phrase “I doubt you”. . and “if you were to see. . to confront the audiences’ perception and present his evaluation. The overall tone of the last section is very emotional and he urges the readers of the letter to adopt the same sense of concern.
Many people see Susanna Rowson’s book, “Charlotte Temple”, as a comment on the need for youth to listen to their elders. However, the theme is far more complicated than this as it shows that the advice itself is flawed. As the characters travel from England to America, the inherent problems of the advice appears. It is here that Montraville father’s advice which is assuming similar experiences leads to lifelong misery. Charlotte the most obvious proof that ignoring your parents advice leads to trouble suffer far greater consequences because of the reversibility of that very same advice. Even the readers experience the dangers of advice as the author cautions the mothers reading the novel that their views and consequently advice are not enough because of the inherent problem of advice not being law. Montraville’s, Charlotte’s, and reader’s stories show that it is not enough to follow parental advice if the advice is misguided, founded in untrue expectations, creating more trouble and misery for the youths.
...ts set for them. Children are constantly aware of adults’ choices, and they begin to formulate their own understanding of general values at a young age. When adults are hypocritical of their pre-set standards, it sends children into a state of discombobulation. Staying true to one’s values as an example for children will be beneficial to them as they travel along the highway of childhood and come upon the exit necessary to reach the interstate of adulthood.
The king withdraws from this exchange, and his mother begins more lovingly, on a different tack. But still Hamlet takes words that others have used and returns them changed or challenged: “Ay, madam, it is common./. . . Seems, madam? Nay, it is. I know not 'seems'” (I.ii.74-76). Although the prince is speaking in public, he uses verbal rhetorical devices most critics in Shakespeare's day would consider unseemly.
“It is a wise father that knows his own child” stated by William Shakespeare, a poet, which suggests that a good parent must have a connection with their child. However, Shakespeare lacked parental affection, the plays that Shakespeare had written, never had a well established relationship between a parent and their child. However the correlation between a parent and child may vary in many occasions and factors such as a healthy/unhealthy relationship, a tempting desire for self success, and a change of heart. Therefore, through an analysis of Jeannette Wall’s The Glass Castle, William Shakespeare’s King Lear, Tennessee William’s The Glass Menagerie, and Martin Fan’s bond with His parents, it becomes clear that the establishments between a
In the introductory paragraph, King introduces his reason for writing the letter and details who the audience is to be. He explains that he rarely answers criticisms and gives his reasons for answering this particular one. This grabs the reader's attention in the first three sentences of the letter and establishes the importance of the document, intriguing the reader to keep reading what becomes a gripping and moving letter.
He claims that the child is born in a neutral state, with no needs until he/she interacts with the parents. By responding to the child’s behavior, the parents will determine the behavior and the character of the child. Parents have the power to bestow or withhold love in relation to their own peculiar needs for love. This creates dependency as the basic feature of the child’s existence. Parents are the first contact and relationship and play an essential role on the child’s development. Their actions and demeanor have a heavy impact on the way their offspring will relate to others, and develop future relationships.
Letters to My Son are letters written by Lord Chesterfield to his son whereby he praises and criticizes him. Chesterfield uses a number of literary devices in his letter such as metaphors, imageries, anastrophe, tonal shift and many others. In addition, Chesterfield uses rhetorical devices such as logos and name calling so that his son can heed to his advices. Chesterfield uses different tones, and language devices to make pass his intended information to his son. He changes his tone, and uses different language styles to be able to convince his son to follow the values, and advices in the letter written to him. In the end, through his language skills and tonal values, he is able to convey his message to his son which is meant to elevate him above all, and become an independent person. Chesterfield is suggestive and condescending in his language, and tone in the letter but his views are very clearly articulated.
The relationship between a father and his son is an important theme in Shakespeare's Henry IV, Part One, as it relates to the two main characters of the play, Prince Hal and Hotspur. These two characters, considered as youths and future rulers to the reader, are exposed to father-figures whose actions will influence their actions in later years. Both characters have two such father-figures; Henry IV and Falstaff for Prince Hal, and the Earl of Northumberland and the Earl of Worcester for Hotspur. Both father-figures for Hal and Hotspur have obvious good and bad connotations in their influence on the character. For example, Falstaff, in his drinking and reveling, is clearly a poor influence for a future ruler such as Prince Hal, and Worcester, who shares Hotspur's temper, encourages Hotspur to make rash decisions. The entire plot of the play is based on which father-figure these characters choose to follow: had they chosen the other, the outcome would have been wholly different.
In spite of the weaknesses, Ivanhoe and King Richard demonstrate true chivalric characteristics. They exemplify integrity, loyalty to the king, a love for adventure and bravery. Through this book, the reader learns the meaning of moral guidelines due to the examples set by King Richard and Ivanhoe. These examples challenge us to search for our own moral guidelines. Without these, we have nothing to strive for.
... is not at all that he imagined. It is dismal and dark and thrives on the profit motive and the eternal lure its name evokes in men. The boy realizes that he has placed all his love and hope in a world that does not exist except in his imagination. He feels angry and betrayed and realizes his self-deception. He feels he is “a creature driven and derided by vanity” and the vanity is his own (Sample Essays).