Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contribution of king Alfred
American influence on Britain
Contribution of king Alfred
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contribution of king Alfred
This article was written about how King Alfred helped shape England’s culture to be what it is today. He was chosen to become king from other members in his family because he was the manliest. He learned something after the previous king’s mistake. The previous king left his men to perish in a battle they would lose. Alfred promised to not let his land and people become that vulnerable again in battle. In his reign, he made many military feats to ensure England had strong defenses. Of these included naval patrols where half the military forces were on duty while the other half were off duty. Forts were also constructed around the country for defense. One of his battles, Chippenham, even became a popular folk tale. He loved literature at a young …show more content…
The author ended this text stating Alfred’s work became almost meaningless due to the achievements of further generations. One important part in this article were the battles in King Alfred’s life. England in this time period had many invasions and battles. Alfred was brilliant by making defensive plans for England. The achievements of Alfred were also significant in this article. He created a school built almost to scale of Charlemagne’s palace, which is a great achievement. He also created his famous educational program during his reign. It was enjoyable to read about England’s culture because America’s founders originated from England. Though, there were some puzzling details found in this article. This article seemed to have a very specific audience. People who were not from England would not be able to fully understand this article. The events, people, and wording were used as an assumption the audience already knew about these. Many people are not familiar with England’s history or culture, which made this article a difficult read. There were some questions that were not answered in this article as well. How did the Mercian’s gain power over the
In “Becoming America: The Revolution Before 1776”, Jon Butler argues that there was massive economic and a political transformation occurred in the era of 1680 and 1770 which had been less examined to the American colonial history. In this book, Butler makes a strong argument for the early modernism of American society which helps to define the growth of American identity. The transformation improved the American socioeconomic character and demonstrated itself almost in every aspect of colonial life. I totally agree with the Jon Butler’s argument that the victories and defeats of the revolutionary war would not define America; it was the middle years of the colonial period that would. And his arguments in this book also challenge the existing history. Butler supports his argument from his own note which he collected from by researching huge amount of specialized history books.
Alfred was thought to get many of his qualities that he used in his kingdom from his grandfather, King Egbert. King Egbert was aggressive and forced in to hiding just like King Alfred was. King Egbert came out of hiding and took back his throne, just like King Alfred. Without the influences of his grandfather’s reign, King Alfred would not have been the king that he was. Another experience King Alfred had that influenced his personality is his trip to v...
Oliver Cromwell was a well known military dictator. He helped the Parliamentarians win the First Civil War and was named Lord Protector. He died in 1658 but many people still remember him as one of the best leaders in history although others believe he was a harsh tyrant and always wanted too much power for himself. Throughout the years, numerous historians have changed their views on whether he was a good leader or not. This work will look at three interpretations from different people on who Cromwell was and what he was like and compare them.
The year 1942 marked a division in the contemporary world history. There were a number of developments that would bring enormous effects for the Old and the New World Wars. The discovery of these developments changed the diets of both the western and eastern regions, assisted in initiating the Atlantic slave trade, and spread illnesses that had a destructive effect on populations in India, and resulted in the creation of European colonies across the Western region (Cohen and Rosenzwei 124). This paper is focused on establishing the main events that made England to gain control over the Atlantic and establishing settlements in North America. The paper also explores the major events that led to the demise of Spanish power in the Atlantic. This will be done through looking at a number of factors including commerce, the rise of competing nations that presented an encouragement for the exploration and colonization of the new lands by the Europeans, rapid population growth, and new learning. In addition, it explores and explains reasons as to why Spain and Portugal were the first to be engaged in the exploration of the overseas, as well as, why France and England were slow in challenging the supremacy of Spain in the Americas. The primary sources to be used include Jamestown: 1607, The First Months, Jamestown: 1609-10, Starving Time by, George Percy, Cotton Mather’s The Ecclesiastical History of New-England, and Journey to Pennsylvania in the year 1750 by Gottlieb Mittelberger.
Leach, Douglas E. flintlock and Tomahawk: New England in King Philip's War. NewYork: Norton, 1959
By the Glorious Revolution of the 17th century, England was already miles ahead of their European brethren. William of Orange and his wife, Mary, took over the English throne after King James fled to France on the heels of his failed attempts to rul...
“The apprenticeship of a King” describes how Charlemagne gained power through conquest and diplomacy. In 768, King Pippin died and his kingdom was divided between his two sons. Charles, the elder, and the younger was Carloman. The author says that little is known of Charles’ boyhood. When he was of the right age, it is recorded that he worked eagerly at riding and hunting. It was the custom of the Franks to ride and be practiced in the use of arms and ways of hunting. We may reasonably infer that acquiring these skills formed a major part of his early education. Charles was not a “man of letters” and the author makes no attempt at explaining this other than to point out that literacy was considered unimportant at that time for anyone other than the clergy and Charles didn’t become interested in “letters” until later in life. Bullough explains a number of experiences in public duties and responsibilities, which were assigned to Charles by his father, thus, giving him an apprenticeship to rule the kingdom. For some reason tension between Charles and his brother began shortly after their accession. The author explains a number of conflicts. The younger brother died however, at the end of 771 and a number of prominent people in his kingdom offered allegiance to Charles. Bullough names and explains those subjects. The result was the re-uniting of those territories, which helped to establish the kingdom of the Franks.
This investigation uses two sources frequently, the Encyclopædia Britannica and Alpha History. Both are accredited tools which concentrate on history of the world. These have provided much of the necessary information to complete this investigation.
In the essay "The Emperor Charlemagne," Einhard discussed the rise and greatness of this ruler, and gave an in-depth look into who the King truly was. After receiving the Frank kingdom from his father, he more than doubled the previous territory that the Franks already pos...
By the end of the Hundred Years’ War, England was embroiled in civil wars, which became known as the Wars of the Roses. King Henry VI became king as a baby and he was not very warlike; for this reason, he was an unsuitable king for such a violent society. Noblemen were exceedingly powerful and they had their own army to threaten the local people and impose their rules. However, the noble families had different interests and were divided in the ones who supported Henry VI, the so-called ‘Lancastrians...
Historical events, their development, and their ramifications are often the purview of contrasting opinions. The development of America is on such example of contrasting views. Within Eric Nellis’, an Associate Professor Emeritus at the University of British Columbia and author of several books on American history, book An Empire of Regions: A Brief History of Colonial British North America and Steven Sarson’s, a senior lecturer at University of Wales, Swansea and a fellow of the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, book British North America 1500-1800 two contrasting views of America’s development. Both explore the same era, and same region but provide contrasting views and different breadths of information. They both centre around the development, and independence of the New World colonies in the period between about 1500 to 1800. Both Nellis, and Sarson present well researched, and articulated, albeit contrasting views on America’s development from part of the British Empire to independence. They have different breadths of information, organizational structures, and influencers resulting in different views and understandings
Many people who read the poem Beowulf would probably find it hard to find similarities between the poem and life in modern America. How could one compare an ancient Anglo-Saxon culture with the sophisticated world that we are living in today? But, if we look closely, we may be able to pinpoint some parallel between the two societies. This essay will discuss the topics of warrior life, the “bad guy,” and social similarities. One might wonder how a warrior culture might be similar to our own? But if we consider American culture, we are actually still very war-like. We have a strong military system built to protect our country and the people that make it up. We are also known for going to the aid of other countries that aren’t able to defend themselves. This is very similar to the mentality of the warriors in Beowulf. Beowulf comes to the aid of Hrothgar’s falling kingdom.
The three heroes discussed here, Beowulf, Sir Gawain and King Arthur, are heroes for different reasons. Beowulf, our earliest hero, is brave but his motivation is different than then other two. To Sir Gawain personal honor and valor is what is important. King Arthur, Sir Gawain's uncle, is naturally the quintessential king of the medieval period. Though all men to a certain extent share the same qualities, some are more pronounced than in the others. It is important to see how these qualities are central to their respective stories and how it helps (or hinders) them in their journeys.
In this essay, I will uncover the countless insights that can be learned about the characters in Beowulf, as well as the society as a whole, based on the weapons the characters choose to use in battle. During the Anglo-Saxon time, roughly between 400 and 1066, swords were considered the most precious weapon someone could own. Although it is not certain who wrote Beowulf, and when, many people believe it was composed in the middle to end of the Anglo-Saxon period. Analyzing the different weapons, and significance of each, in Beowulf, and comparing them to the weaponry at the time, provides the readers with a great deal of insight into the society during this period. The use of weapons in Beowulf not only provides the readers with insight into
him a special place beside English kings since the time of Alfred. The body of writings were