How Did George Fitzhugh Argue In Defense Of Slavery

952 Words2 Pages

This paper will be answering the declarations in defense of slavery made by George Fitzhugh with evidence from the Narrative of the life of Fredrick Douglass. Much of George Fitzhugh’s arguments specify the conditions of southern slavery and how it is much better than anywhere else. Therefore much of the evidence will be towards the comparison of southern plantation and city slavery conditions. Douglass’s Narrative provides excellent insight into this issue because of his slave experience in both areas. Fitzhugh stated that “the negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and in some sense, the freest people in the world…The negro men and stout boys work, on the average, in good weather, no more than nine hours a day” (Fitzhugh 357). The …show more content…

There is no way slavery could have made slaves moral and intelligent. As said before there were plantations like Mr. Covey’s that were meant to “break” a slave that would destroy his morals and reduce him to a mindless working machine. Next, it was common during that time for masters to prevent their slaves to learn how to read and write or to become more intelligent academically at all. This was very apparent during Douglass’s time in Baltimore: “[Mr. Auld] forbade Mrs. Auld to instruct me further [in spelling and reading], telling her … that it was unlawful, as well as unsafe” (Douglass 63). Therefore it could not have been possible for slaves to be intelligent if their masters thought as dangerous and on top of that it was even illegal. In the same document Fitzhugh makes the point that slaves can be seen singing happily, but very early on in Douglass’s narrative he say otherwise. “Slave sing most when they are most unhappy. The songs of the slave represent the sorrows of his hear; and he is relieved by them, only as an aching heart is relieved by its tears” (Douglass 51). When the slaves sang they really were not happy, but rather they were in their saddest

Open Document