Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short term effects of online education
Effect of online education
Effect of online education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short term effects of online education
Introduction Online education is growing at a rapid rate. Higher education in the form of online learning is becoming more prevalent each year. (Barr and Miller, 2013) “Over 4.6 million students were taking at least one online course during the fall 2008 term; a 17 percent increase over the number reported the previous year.” (Allen & Seaman, 2009) With this being the case, the need to have a well working system and employees is high. Having a high performance working system (HPWS) is the key to this. A HPWS is a group of HRM practices that help to promote skill enhancement, knowledge, employee involvement and motivation. (Armstrong, 2012a; Bohlander and Snell, 2013) Any type of organization that uses HPWS or HR systems that are designed to encourage employees in areas of competencies, performance, and motivation can be linked to lower employee turnover, higher labor productivity and an improvement in overall company performance. (Datta, Guthrie and Wright, 2005; Liao, Toya, Lepak and Hong, 2009) Key Principles in a HPWS A HPWS has many aspects to it however, not all will apply in an online setting. Bohlander and Snell (2013): and Armstrong (2012a), identify four primary principles that make a HPWS function. These are: egalitarianism and engagement, information sharing, performance reward and promotion opportunities, and knowledge development or training programs. This are typical HR practices. The difference is that in a HPWS they are “...bundled together so that they support one another and make a greater impact on performance as an integrated whole.” (Armstrong, 2012b, p. 157) Egalitarianism and employee engagement can be achieved when employees feel that they are members of a team and not simply cogs in an organizati... ... middle of paper ... ...ct lack of data available pertaining to HPWSs and online higher education there is no reason to think that an online university cannot successfully implement a HPWS. Strategic implementation of a HPWS will involve closely adhering to the key elements and principles. “Increased dialogue between management and employees and regular use of employee surveys and discussion groups may help management better understand what employees actually experience in the workplace and reduce the discrepancy between management and employee perspectives.” (Liao et al., 2009) Armstrong, 2012b) stated that surveys have reported organizations that use the HPWS have shown a “significant impact financial performance.” (p.160) By implementing a HPWS the university will have better employee morale, engagement, communication, efficiency and effectiveness, revenue and customer satisfaction.
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Human Resources (HR) has been constantly evolving due to technological innovations, tough competition and rapid growth of globalization. The Knowledge Age of 21 century demonstrates the significant shift in strategies and methods have been used by HR professionals to efficiently manage personnel in the organization. Such change leads to acknowledgement of the true value of employee based on their ability and potential to excel. “Knowledge Age worker-citizens need to be able to locate, assess, and represent new information quickly. They need to be able to communicate this to others, and to be able to work productively in collaborations with others. They need to be adaptable, creative and innovative, and to be able to understand things at a ‘systems’ or big picture’ level” (NZCER, 2013, p.1).
Appendix The Encyclopedia of Informative Education. Human Performance Strategies -. Works Cited High Performance Teams. 2007. The 'Secondary' of the Online.
...ecause of the communication tools provided through HPWS. “By consistently applying the tools across Operations, Kraft was assured that people and work systems were aligned” (Carter et al, p.37). In fact, most of their Champions became so adept at HPWS that they are now internal consultants for the company. That level of knowledge, commitment, and motivation among their people will surely allow Kraft to sustain momentum and realize future success.
I selected to discuss the employee engagement process intervention method. According to Kahn (1990), employee engagement is when organizational members utilize their emotional, cognitive, and physical means in order to perform their duties (as cited in Xu & Thomas, 2011). The purpose of using the employee engagement process intervention method is to convert the culture in management from one that is traditional to one that has shared responsibilities, collaborative, and team focused (Holman, Devane, & Cady, 2007). Furthermore, the purpose of this intervention method is to achieve an environment with open communication, and individual accountability of the culture (Holman et al., 2007).
...enough research on it. Some drawbacks are less employment security, a loss of pay due to the profit-sharing model, and there is evidence of some firms engaging in downsizing and layoffs who have adopted HPW. There is also evidence that implementation of HPW systems in lower-tier service jobs results in negligible differences in any of the above categories. Only in the upper-tier services can more of the benefits of this model be had, which unfortunately leads to potentially greater market segmentation (Krahn, Lowe, Hughes, 2011 p. 267-268).
Employee engagement is based on the relationship between people and organizations. People and organizations need each other. Organizations need ideas, energy, and talent; people need careers, salaries, and opportunities (Bolman & Deal, 2013, p. 117). The facts are that employee engagement is based on employee needs. As an example Apple’s offshore employees that make their products suffer in bad conditions with long hours, low pay, and intense pressure to mass produce more product. This company is an example of not having very good employee engagement. Employee engagement is about taking care of the people in your organization to allow them to grow and prosper. Employees gain motivation and interest in the success of the
The study of employee engagement has been a steady increase over the last ten years, due to the fact that employee engagement has a significant factor in an organization 's success and competitive advantages (Saks & Gurman, 2014). Employee engagement is defined as employees who are engaged “for the best interest of the organization, and it is associated with meaningfulness, safety, and ability” (Abu-Shamaa, Al-Rabayah & Khasawneh 2015). This results in employees being dedicated, focus and willing to do what it takes to get the tasks done. Similarly, having the effectiveness of value and pride towards their work. In contrast, employee burnout is the opposite of employee engagement. Burnout is a “syndrome of weariness with work
Ulrich, D., Younger, J., and Brockbank, W. 2008. “The twenty-first century HR organization.” Human Resource Management, 47, pp.829-850.
It is important for senior leaders in an organization to be engaged themselves and to have the ability to encourage engagement amongst the rest of the organization. One of the ways that senior leaders can promote employee engagement is through aligning organizational culture with work systems to attain company objectives. Communication channels that are open between senior management and employees will enable all levels of employees to understand company goals and strategies. This knowledge is a resource provided to the employees, which they will use to increase their own efficacy in their roles. Effective communication will help to create a positive working environment where there are clear expectations of each
The ability to integrate generations will be a significant interpersonal skill set requirement of those in Human Resources. The Manager of Employee Engagement develops engaging and prompt manners to determine employee satisfaction and receive feedback focusing on the lean towards specialization in the workforce, along with the need to retain talent (Guppta, 2016). The Director of Learning is in charge of “designing voluntary or mandatory training programs, and bridging virtual and in-person training sessions and exercises (Guppta, 2016).” The internet allows HR to search a broader base of potential employees by using online job postings and online recruiting companies such as Monster.com or CareerBuilder.com.
Reed, S. M., & Bogardus, A. M. (2012). PHR/SPHR: Professional in human resources certification study guide (4th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc. ISBN-13: 9781118289174
In today’s competitive workforce, talent is not only incremental, but also scarce. War for talent, a term coined by Steven Hankin of McKinsey & Company, refers to the competitive landscape of talent management of skilled and valuable employees. Talent management is defined as “the implementation of integrated strategies or systems designed to increase workplace productivity by developing improved processes for attracting, developing, retaining and utilizing people with the required skills and aptitude to meet current and future business needs” (Lockwood, 2006). This paper talks about the challenges faced by organizations and how organizations use strategic HR to overcome concerns regarding attraction, recruitment and retention of talented employees. A few HR executives have raised that “the single greatest challenge in workforce management is creating or maintaining their companies’ ability to compete for top talent” (Jones & Keene, 2005). Moreover attracting and recruiting talented employees is not sufficient anymore, organizations need to implement an effective policy to retain these employees. The strategies discussed in this paper are supported with real time case studies to add further accreditation. The research drawn from these case studies are both empirical and theoretical in nature.
The Human Resources department contributes to an organization’s competitive performance through: recruitment and selection, globalization and technology.
Kazlauskaite, R., Buciuniene, I. & Turauskas, L. (2012). Organisational and psychological empowerment in the HRM-performance linkage . Employee Relations, 34(2), 138-158. Online learning, and teaching in higher education [ebrary Reader version] Retrieved from http//.site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/Doc?id= 2540278881.