Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contribution of Byron in romanticism
Contribution of Byron in romanticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contribution of Byron in romanticism
Shiv Rohira
Professor Juliette Apkarian
Russian 271: Literature of Imperial Russia
September 15th, 2015
Response Paper “Both villains and heroes need to have a steadfast belief in themselves.”- Jack Gleeson
This quote demonstrates how our “hero” Pechorin is neither a quintessential hero nor villain because his internally conflicted character, and his destructive nature places him in the margin between the two. Employing a a unique style of varying narrative techniques in a series of five skillfully connected short stories, the author, Mikhail Lermontov, depicts the bizarre Romanticism and Byronic nature of Pechorin’s “heroism” , and the internal complexities of his character,
…show more content…
A romantic is someone who neglects societal norms and has a higher intellect and purpose. He possesses qualities like selflessness, that put him above the rest, and has an elevated sense of natural beauty, leading an atypical life driven by emotion and self-criticism. In the introduction of the novel, Maksim Maksimovich describes Pechorin to the readers and the traveler, “ He was so very elegant, his complexion so nice and white, his uniform so brand new, …” (Lermontov 16) thereby highlighting his “handsomeness”, a characteristic that gains Pechorin attention and makes him appealing to other characters in the book. Pechorin also develops a bitter outlook on life, as a result of its monotony. Despite being surrounded by the constant activity of the military in the present, it is ironic that he is unable to seek some challenge or thrill. His cynicism towards life is heightened when he complains to Maksim “My soul has been spoiled by the world, my imagination is unquiet, my heart insatiate”(Lermontov 70) demonstrating how his imagination led him astray giving him hope for adventure in his life, but he feels dissatisfied because his desires were futile . Additionally, he has an intense desire to travel perpetually, as shown by “My life grows emptier day by day. One expedient only is left to me-travel.”(Lermontov 71). Furthermore, Pechorin makes exaggerated claims of misery and boredom, and …show more content…
He uses them for amusement(Bela), to satisfy his ego(Vera), and to attack other men(Princess Mary) For instance, in ‘Princess Mary’, Pechorin talks about his “colorless youth” , to make Mary feel sympathetic towards him so he can exploit her. The detail and technicality of the story he told her, clearly demonstrates his special intellect and keen observation, in tandem with the theme of Romanticism. Additionally, he objectifies these women involuntarily, metaphorically comparing them to different animals, “There was a good deal of breeding in her…Breeding in woman, as in horses, is a great thing: a discovery”(Lermontov 75), “hid herself frightened out through the thicket” (Lermontov 76), “like a snake, she gilded from between my arms”(Lermontov 77), “but she clung like a cat” (Lermontov 78), “her serpent-like nature” (Lermontov 78) . Here Pechorin degrades women by comparing them to animals and uses possessive pronouns
The characterizations of women have, throughout history, been one of the most problematic subjects in literary tradition. An extraordinary dichotomy has existed with women as being both the paragon of virtue and the personification of evil. Ancient Greeks feared women, and poets such as Hesiod believed the female sex was created to be the scourge of the gods and the bane of men (Fantham 39). Romans, on the other hand, incorporated tales of brave and virtuous women as an intrinsic part of their legendary history (219). Many Catholic saints, revered for their piety, were notoriously misogynistic (Dollison 106), and yet the church counted legions of holy women in the rosters of saints alongside their male counterparts. Despite much historical controversy as to the precise nature of women, none of this confusion seems to seep into the writings of George MacDonald, and there appears to be no conflict to MacDonald’s regard towards women in his female characters in The Princess and the Goblin. The character of the Grandmother in particular is one of the most complimentary fabrications of the figure of the mature female in literature. MacDonald created this fascinating construct of femininity by steeping the Grandmother not only in the arcane feminine symbols such as spinning, pigeons, and the moon, but also in his own concept of the ideal woman, as wise and compassionate as she is mysterious.
The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture Bolshevik cultural policy was based on spreading their values to the population. They attempted to promote equality to create a classless society. In addition to removing class differences they attempted to give equal status to women and to young people. In order to encourage women to work state funded crèches were established and laws passed to give women parity in terms of pay with men. The state tried to destroy the old concept of families by legalising abortion and enabling people to obtain divorces much more simply.
In order to be able to assess the reasons as to why it was that the
We first meet Dmitri Gurov, a married middle aged man with children, who has been unfaithful to his wife many times. He has a great contempt for women and refers to them as “the lower race”. But strangely can’t get enough of them, “ It seemed to him that he had been so schooled by bitter experience that he might call them what he liked, and yet he could not get on for two days together without the lower race”. He is a player, a playboy. He doesn’t feel comfortable around men so he focuses his energies on the ladies, “In the society of men he was bored and not himself, with them he was cold and uncommunicative; but when he was in the company of women he felt free, and knew what to say to them and how to behave; and he was at ease with them even when he was silent”. He tells women what they want to hear so he can get them to bed, “ In his appearance, in his character, in his whole nature, there was something attractive and elusive which allured women and disposed then in his favour; he knew that, and some force seemed to draw him, too, to them.” This keeps life simple for him.
A Hero of Our Time - Gregoriy Pechorin is No Hero Is Pechorin, the protagonist of Mikhail Lermontov's novella A Hero of Our Time an honorable man? Much of Pechorin's behavior proves him to be a cruel and insensitive man, who seems to bring only havoc and destruction to a situation. He is often aggravating, self-serving and insensitive to others. However in other instances, Pechorin proves himself to be the least reprehensible character. He shows himself to be a man with great self knowledge and knowledge of human behavior.
The aristocratic women or rather the “mothers” enjoy the benefits of wealth and high society and use their perspective abilities to influence men. These women portray three very different kinds of female roles. Arina Barzarova the selfless caretaker, Evdoksya Kukshina the independent feminist, and Anna Odintsova who is both guardian and liberal, but all maintain emotional, social, and romantic control over the men in their lives. Arina Vlasevna Bazarova, the overly emotional mother of Enyushka Bazarova, is an intensely superstitious woman who “believed in all manner of omens, soothsayings, incantations, and pr...
... seen as unholy and and frightening, while the powers of men are natural and gifts from God himself. The author was quick to show that women's virtues are to be displayed through obedience, beauty, and piousness. The lord's wife in Bisclavret fails to support her husband and is tortured by the king, the wolf, and later by the genetic deformities of her offspring. The seigneur's wife in Yönec accepts the gifts of Muldumarec and is blessed with fleeting happiness and the postmortem adoration of her son's subjects.
The conflict between good and evil is one of the most common conventional themes in literature. Coping with evil is a fundamental struggle with which all human beings must contend. Sometimes evil comes from within a character, and sometimes other characters are the source of evil; but evil is always something that the characters struggle to overcome. In two Russian novels, Fyodor Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment and Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Master and Margarita, men and women cope with their problems differently. Raskolnikov in Crime and Punishment and the Master in The Master and Margarita can not cope and fall apart, whereas Sonya in Crime and Punishment and Margarita in The Master and Margarita, not only cope but pull the men out of their suffering.
to be a quite romantic person, as, to start with, he is in love with
...Piercy badgers the reader with Comstock's view of women (mostly in the descriptions of his dutiful wife and obedient daughter) to illustrate his sexism, however, the belabored point begins to fall flat and instead leaves the character feeling one-dimensional. Likewise, even men initially introduced to the reader as pro-feminist, like Theodore Tilton, meet with a predictable sexist ending. These men were no doubt chosen to embody the patriarchal society of then and today, but the unyielding portrayal began to feel overwhelmingly oppressive (perhaps her intent) and a novel so based in realism, on that point, began to feel contrived, therefore unrealistic. Nevertheless, Piercy compares and contrasts the experiences of the characters', offering them up to the reader, perhaps in hope that similarities can be identified and a feminist dialogue can be started or continued.
Heroism can show itself in many shapes and forms from ordinary people to heroic and courageous people something to think about is that anyone can show heroism. A lot of people have shown heroism just by doing the right thing such as just helping someone or not acting mean towards others. heroism can show itself in many different forms but sadly some ordinary people don’t get recognized for the heroic acts that they do. Many different people just don’t recognize heroism from ordinary people as they just think of superheroes and supervillains. In reality anyone can achieve heroism as long as they strive for it. While ordinary people can sometimes not be recognized for acts of heroism, these heroes are courageous and can defeat all of the challenges
feminist theory. Through Anton Chekhov’s plays, the paper also attempts to critically analyse the role of women in Russia and portrays gender roles and the subjugation of women and their lack of rights as a result of social constructs created by the patriarchs of the society, also those who have control over the socio-political aspects of the society. The concepts of feminism, patriarchy, and subjugation are to be understood with respect to the Russian experience of emancipation. The paper on the whole attempts to employ the feminist literary theory and in light of feminist criticism, analyse the two plays in question and talk about the state of women, tracing the overall growth in their stature from the Russia of 19th century to contemporary Russia and highlight the inequality derived out of gender roles and orthodox stereotypes.
The concept of heroism has been a topic of hot debate since the beginning of time itself. The disparities between the Greek concept of heroism and the modern concept of heroism are huge. In this century, a hero is the one in shining armor, willing to lay down his life for the safety of others. However, it will be preposterous to dismiss this definition, although it does not exactly exemplify the Greek concept of heroism. It is, in fact, one of the qualities of a hero as shown in not only The Odyssey, but also in The Iliad. In these two poems by Homer, the heroes eventually die, but their deeds precede them.
In “The Darling”, Anton Chekhov pairs a critical narrator with a static, one-dimensional main character to make a point about women in 19th century Russian society. He portrays Olenka as a woman who acquires her self-identity and sense of self-worth by making her current husband’s ideas her own, and he uses a narrator who continually criticizes Olenka for not having a thought on her own. Chekhov implies that truly interesting women achieve social and intellectual equality to men. The story’s main character, Olenka, however, possesses enough beauty to attract many men yet loses them to fate.