His reasoning for poor education is mainly revolved around politicians, corporations, and the ... ... middle of paper ... ...l system. Corporate advertisements are manipulating and ruining students’ education in school. Some schools funds solely rely off of corporation’s revenue; when a corporation falls apart, so will the school. The final factor is that politicians refuse to fund education, but are angry about how America is behind other countries in education. Moore states that politicians “would rather hold hearings about the depravity of a television show called Jackass than about their own depravity in neglecting our schools and children.”(Moore 131) This shows that they are not focused enough on improving our country’s education.
The American education decline continues to plummet. The generation today knows less and is less literate than their parent generation. People blame this decline for so many different reasons, but those people can all agree on one common denominator—children are not learning in the classroom. Benjamin Barber, in his article “America Skips School”, argues many reasons why children are not learning in the classroom. His overall thesis was “the reason for the country’s inaction is that Americans do not really care about education—the country has grown comfortable with the game of ‘let’s pretend we care’” (Barber, 2014, p.
School is Bad for Children In “School is Bad for Children”, John Holt discusses the faults and failures of the education system. According to Holt traditional schooling stifles children’s curiosity and learning, causing them to be ill-equipped as adults. He believes children are smarter before they enter school, having already mastered what he says is the most important thing, language. Holt goes on to describe how children no longer learn for themselves in school. Their learning has become a passive process.
To say school is bad for children is extremely inaccurate, many children look forward to this as their safe haven. In John Holt 's essay “school is bad for children” he argues that school prevents children from learning what they want and that it enables their curiosity making them become passive learners I found myself disagreeing with his arguments. Holt proposes ideas to reform the school system to make it more favorable for children in which i do agree with partially. School is one of the many things children need to succeed; getting students to work together more efficiently is great but taking students out of the school to learn along with removing compulsory school attendance and required curriculum is not the answer. More one on one
Students are deemed unknowledgeable and are subjugated by this conformity supporting system. Teacher’s egocentric nature discriminates the students from themselves and undermines any creativity. By not being supported for their own ideas and needing to adopt the ideas ... ... middle of paper ... ... how to convert the existing public school systems, we develop a criterion of community involvement within schools. Schools simply do not have funding to benefit all students equally within education. Therefore, more volunteer work in after-school programs, such as academic homework programs, would create the possibilities for promoted critical thinking.
The schools are forced to cut back on programs such as extracurricular activities that are suppose to encourage students to be active, or they would have to cut back on supplies where in some cases there are not enough textbooks for each student to have his or her own. The U.S. Department of Education also stated that teachers that are less paid and have less years teaching are often the ones dealing with the students in poverty. (U.S. Department of Education). This only prolongs the problem with children receiving the proper education. If they are taught by teachers who don’t know what they are teaching or those who don’t have enough experience, then the students are not going to learn the correct information or any information at all.
Also, some parents of students in poverty have a lower level of education than the people working at schools. When talking to principals or teachers, a parent does not want to feel inferior in the conversation. The more diverse vocabulary used by the faculty and staff at schools can be intimidating. This is one reason why parents are reluctant to get involved in reading programs, the Parent Teacher Association, and other extra-curricular activities. In order to distance themselves from the feeling of inferiority, parents distance themselves from their children’s schools.
These presumptions have been calamitous to the education system in light of the fact that they don't represent favoritism of schools in the edification system. For instance, schools that have profoundly taught educators, advanced material, and suitable facilities can give more to the learner than those that don't. How then can schools be required to be evaluated the same on the off chance that they are not the same? By dismissing the education of American youngsters, and not giving an equivalent thorough training to each person in every school, social order is setting them up for failure. More people will drop out of school because of failing grades in light of the fact that schools are equipping them for government sanctioned tests, and not giving a thorough training that shows them how to utilize their education, other than a test taken yearly.
In Mary Sherry’s short story “In Praise of the F Word” Mary discusses that today’s education is cheating our children and future employers by passing children before they are ready to leave our education system. Mary is a teacher of an adult literacy program, who before would blame divorce, drugs and other problems for children not doing well in school. Mary learned by her experience with her son that one of the most effective ways to motivate a young student is by allowing the student to fail. Because teachers would pass students so easily, Mary believes students do not feel motivated to do the best that they could. Mary believes if “Flunking” was made a normal thing the fear of failure would stop students from cheating themselves and focusing more on their education.
it is true that being bilingual provide cognitive advantages and creates strong effect on executive function of brain but speaking second language than that of home environment creates a confliction and confusion among the parents and children. It creates a lacks of interaction and communication among them. Since, student/children learn English but their parents are unable speak same, it creates where children encounters inappropriate situation rather than interacting different types of social situations among family and neighborhood. Similarly students lacks the cultural awareness and are supposed to be a victim of convoluted relationship. During a research by a writer from the Los Angeles Times, he found that students stay only in the class where their ethnic group tends or belong and bilingual educators are abandoning classes belonging to multiculturalism.