Heart Of Darkness Imperialism

1290 Words3 Pages

The colonization of Africa, though often forgotten, could more accurately be remembered as the conquering of Africa. European countries often included many brutal and aggressive actions in order to overpower of the natives of the land. The economic benefits of the colonization were the motivation to most countries and individuals. In his novella, Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad illustrates the story of free spirit, Charlie Marlow, and his journey to the Congo and eventually his encounter with the manager of the Inner Station with an extensive reputation, Mr. Kurtz. Marlow’s anecdote exemplifies the true nature of those involved with the colonization, both positive and negative.
According to Conrad, a heart of darkness is an individual …show more content…

Unlike Kurtz, Marlow acts upon his own moral principles, whether they are ethically correct or not. Marlow clearly goes through mental contemplation when observing the “savages” of the land, developing a “kinship” with the natives even though he was raised in a time where he was conditioned to believe the natives did not amount to Marlow. Near the end of the text, even Marlow, who almost held Kurtz on a pedestal, realized the horror Kurtz had caused to the Inner Station and the natives, causing his tone toward Kurtz shifts from idolization to disgust. Marlow reflects, “If it had come to crawling before Mr. Kurtz, he crawled as much as the veriest savage of them all” (Conrad …show more content…

Even before Marlow begins his adventure, he feels uneasy unlike his other expeditions. While discussing the trip with his aunt, Marlow feels troubled about his aunt’s praise of the company. Throughout the discourse, Marlow thought, “I ventured to hint that the company was run for profit” (Conrad 10). After encountering the natives of the Congo for the first time, Marlow views them in an extremely inhuman outlook. He tells his audience that it was extremely difficult to accept that he was slightly related to him. This shows Marlow’s lack of compassion for human life. He is not just a product of his time; Marlow knows that these natives are also humans and yet he continues to segregate and dehumanize them.
Marlow even attempts to preserve Kurtz’s reputation at the end of the text, because it is possible that Marlow empathized and connected with Kurtz. Marlow reveres Kurtz as a “remarkable man”. Not to mention Marlow still views Kurtz through his god-like reputation, even after what he experienced. After almost praising Kurtz, Marlow confesses, “That is why I have remained loyal to Kurtz to the last” (Conrad 65). Even though Marlow realized the wrong Kurtz caused to the African community, he continues to adhere to what Kurtz

Open Document