Harvest Of Shame Essay Sociology

1417 Words3 Pages

Less than sixty years ago, the plight of the country’s most vulnerable migrant farm workers shocked millions of Americans after many of whom had just enjoyed their biggest meal of the year. Since it first aired after Thanksgiving Day in 1960, “Harvest of Shame” has become one of the seminal documentaries in the history of American broadcast journalism. Not only was it a significant contribution to the anti-poverty movement in the 1960s, it also exposed the plight of migrant workers in American and their brutal living conditions in which leading journalist Edward R. Murrow described as “wrong the dignity of man” (Harvest of Shame). The shocking and continuous parallels between the film and John Steinbeck’s “The Harvest Gypsies” reflect the …show more content…

The film opens with a crowd of African-Americans looking for jobs (Harvest of Shame). As employers yell out the daily wage, men and women are tightly packed onto large trucks headed to the fields (Harvest of Shame). One farmer describes the scene, “we used to own our slaves…now we just rent them” (Harvest of Shame). This shows that even though slavery has been abolished, unfair treatment towards African-American workers still exist. Even though African-American workers existed in the 1930s, they were generally excluded in Steinbeck’s article. Their heavy presence in the film not only highlights the continued mistreatment of migrant farm laborers, especially African-Americans, but also how the Civil Rights Movement was “a black freedom movement’s fight for jobs and justices” (MacLean 4). As evident through the film, African-Americans were consistently suppressed by employers which contributed to igniting the fire for “economic citizenship” during the Civil Rights Movement (Martínez-Matsuda 10 November …show more content…

By showing it after Thanksgiving Day, the film startled and astonished many of its viewers as the images of dirty shacks and hungry children did not square with the large feast of Thanksgiving. “Were it not for the labor of the people you are going to meet, you might not starve, but your table would not be laden with the luxuries that we have all come to regard as essentials” (Harvest of Shame). Furthermore, the film did contribute to the wave of social awareness and activism in the 1960s. Public outcry helped propel the plight of farm laborers on to the nation’s political agenda. In 1962, Congress passed the Migrant Health Act which financed clinics, immunization, and prenatal and natal care (Knebel 1132). However, real progress was elusive as many agricultural businesses launched an offensive to block further attempts at reforms and wage increases by lobbying lawmakers (Knebel 1132). While Murrow and the film had limited legislative impact, it galvanized public opinion and ignited a movement towards helping migrant

Open Document