Harrison Bergeron: The Battle Between Equality And Individuality

833 Words2 Pages

The Fight Between Equality and Individuality Equality is a topic of great debate in the world today, ranging from the people of the LGBT community fighting for their right to marry the person they love, to minorities fighting for the right to not be racially profiled and prosecuted for their skin color, to store owners and clerks fighting for their right to religious freedom if they do not want to serve a gay man or woman. While not all of these rights are fully recognized, there are rights that every man, woman, and child, in democratic countries, have. Whether these rights are God given or legislative, they allow everybody to better himself the way he sees fit. Every person has the ability to say or write what he wants and how he wants to. …show more content…

Nobody is better than anyone else. Nobody is wealthier than anybody else. Nobody is healthier than anybody else. Nobody is more beautiful than anybody else. This description of utopia can bring about two possible outcomes: one as seen in Thomas More’s Utopia and the other as seen in “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. In More’s Utopia, the best possible outcome came from everyone’s equality. However, all the conditions just happened to be perfect. Everyone was willing to work while receiving the same supplies as everyone else, everyone was incredibly healthy because the country of Utopia had free hospitals with the most skilled nurses, and everyone just happened to be amazingly beautiful. This is one of the few instances that total equality can still keep individuality intact. While there is no way for the citizens to better themselves financially or through inheritance, there is still the opportunity for every person to better themselves physically and intellectually. This allows for the individual to choose what he wants to better about himself in and how he can do that, whether that is a workout regimen or a certain diet or a subject of learning that interests him. Even though this bettering of one’s self is expected in Utopia, it is still the right of the citizen to decide if he wishes to do …show more content…

Nobody is wealthier, smarter, stronger, or more beautiful than anyone else. Unlike Utopia, instead of bringing the people up, the government in “Harrison Bergeron” brings down those who are above average through handicaps such as radios to distract the intelligent, weights to hold down the strong, and masks to hide the beautiful. By stripping everyone of the rights which once gave everyone equal opportunities, the United States government created a country where, by making everyone equal by force, its citizens are no longer individuals, but the same person repeated over and over again. The country would be different if some personal development were allowed but any sort of activity that would make one person different from another is punishable by two years in prison, a large fine or even death. It is one thing to not value personal improvement, but to punish the action creates a society were individuals are not just rare, but are illegal. By outlawing the individual, the government is creating a country that will eventually be filled with mindless drones, only capable of doing one thing:

Open Document