Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The HR Sergeant’s Role in the Army Profession
Military professionalism
Responsibilities non commissioned officer in the army
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The HR Sergeant’s Role in the Army Profession
The Importance of the Human Resources Sergeant in the Profession of Arms
Professionalizing the force is of great importance and the weight is carried by the Non Commissioned Officers Corps as the backbone of the Army. To be considered a profession there is certain ethics, morals, and standards that need to be revered. There are several qualities that must be imbued by leadership to take on this distinction and transformation of today’s fighting force into an elite professional organization. The Human Resources Sergeant plays a pragmatic role in today’s military and professional culture and is an important element of the command structure that has a direct impact on the force’s perception, as well as the public’s perception, of what a
…show more content…
To Be is to “believe in yourself, your mission, your unit, and the United States Army” (ausa.org, 2017). A professional force must Know what they are doing. Knowing every aspect of the job and how to motivate others is a magnificent development tool. Lastly, to Do focuses on functioning as a Soldier to the highest degree possible. Encompassing the Be, Know, Do philosophy builds a steady base in what professionalism can be constructed …show more content…
HR Sergeants are typically the first personnel that new soldiers come into contact with upon signing in to a new unit. This gives that soldier a first impression on the dedication to duty, service, neatness, and organization of the gaining unit. They must function flawlessly with the command team to ensure processes are operational. Their importance to the unit is to ensure overall functionality to the organization as a whole by completing administrative tasks to prevent any limitations. Not only are HR Sergeants expected to be knowledgeable on all aspects of HR functions, they are expected to be quite resourceful. For many leaders when there is a task or question their first stop is usually the S1. The HR Sergeant has to have a general knowledge in Finance, Legal, Medical, military programs, and many other areas including family situations to be able to refer a soldier to an adequate agency that will better assist. The old saying “get with your S1” rings true; HR Sergeants are the few that interact with everyone no matter what the soldiers job or rank is. HR Sergeants should be consummate professionals in all tasks that they carry out as an example to others and create a culture that imbues this
From family to squad members, communication acts as the cornerstone for a military officer, assisting in the mental health of the individual as well as facilitating the conduction of successful operations by an intricate, yet responsive, organization. Military officers are often times imagined as infallible heroes, unwavering against and untouched by the realities of modern warfare. Yet, newly commissioned, 22 year old officers often faces the arduous responsibilities of leading a platoon or flight comprised of men and women generally the same age as themselves into combat, or managing millions of dollars worth
The United States Army, in its current state, is a profession of arms. In order to be considered a profession, the organization must have an ethical code rooted in values, strong trust with its clients, and be comprised of experts within the trade. These experts are constantly developing the trade for the present and the future and hold the same shared view of their trade culture.
After more than ten years of persistent counterinsurgency (COIN) conflict and multiple simultaneous responses to several natural disasters, the United States Army is at a crossroads regarding professional education for its officers and enlisted force. Considering overseas contingency operations in Iraq are due to conclude in December 2011 and by 2014 for Afghanistan, it is plausible that strategic planners are considering the future make-up of what will constitute the Total Army Force to include new educational criteria for what could be a smaller force than was needed for present day operations. While this may be “peace dividend” speculation, there is precedence for the Army to reevaluate its force structure and personal qualification requirements after every major conflict over the last century. . Even though defense budget reductions should redoubt army equipment priorities, training deferrals because of persistent contingency operations have inhibited enlisted professional development despite that counterinsurgency operations require refocused soldiers training to improve their sense of situational understanding and application of observable operational ethics through conceptual enlisted leadership evaluation efforts.
The Army requires its members to adhere to prolonged training and learn specialized skills. From the moment a soldier transitions from the civilian sector into the Army, he is indoctrinated with training. Regardless of rank, the Army demands each soldier to be technically proficient and mentally competent in order to be qualified in a respective Military Occupation Specialty. As a soldier progresses in his military career, he is required to continue his education and training. Army leaders are expected and required to continue developing their skills through academic studies, operational experience, and institutional training. An opposing view argues that anyone can learn these skills; however, statistics show less than 0.5% of the population serves in the armed forces, indicating a soldier is a rare mix of intelligence and character.1 These lessons are necessary qualifications to achieve what General Martin Dempsey describes as “effectiveness rather than efficiency.”2 Much like the profession of medicine which must heal, the media which must provide truth, and law which must provide justice, the profession of arms must provide secur...
However, development starts day one with training. Therefore, the Soldiers have to be experts who have assumed the character and identity of the profession; professionalism in Soldiers enables them to perform their duties with lots of motivation and inspiration. For example, 42A - The Human Resources (HR) Sergeant supervises, performs personnel and administrative functions in support of company, battery, and troop; detachments at division, corps, and echelons above corps must master their skill level in an effort to be a subject matter expert in their profession. The functions of Human Resource support four fundamental competencies: Man the Force (ex. Strength reporting), Provide HR Services (ex. Postal operations), Coordinate Personnel Support (ex. Morale, welfare, and Recreation), and Conduct HR Planning and Operations (ex. Planning and operations) in which a HR personnel must accomplish to support the mission. As a result, a professional Soldier should meet very high standards of a profession, for example character, competence, expertise and morality to fulfil their HR role. These standards are attained through rigorous training, development, and educating the Soldiers on how to serve the nation and the constitution as professionals. After nine years of war, which erupted from 9/11 we assess the attributes
The Human Resources Sergeant (HR Sergeant) in the profession has the responsibility to balance the role of the profession’s Human Resources Leaders and the Army professional culture. The HR Sergeant in the Professional Arms has the role of supporting the Army culture. The HR Sergeant also ensures that a balance in the leadership role is attained. All these are for the purpose of achieving one common goal of the military in defending the U.S Society.
Role of HR Sergeant in the Profession of Arms What does it mean to be a Human Resources (HR) Sergeant? We can easily think of what the staff in the S-1 shops do, or we can easily think about the duties of our unit Administrative NCO. Is this all it means to be a Human Services Sergeant? There are different variable behind the concept of the HR role. Before we can determine the role of HR, we must discuss different aspects of leadership and the Profession of Arms.
In June 2013 Army Doctrine Reference Publication 1 (ADRP1) “The Army Profession” was released and the website http://cape.army.mil was created. In (ADRP1), it states there are five essential characteristics of the Army Profession, trust, military expertise, honorable service, Esprit de Corps, and stewardship (ADRP1, 2013). Those characteristics is what I think separates a Soldier from a civilian. No one should think that their job or occupation is harder or more important than someone else’s. It takes all kinds of professions to make this country work but the Army could not be as successful as it is today without our professionals teaching, coaching, mentoring and preserving these five characteristics.
bonded with comrades in a shared identity and culture of sacrifice and service”. Culture which sponsors continuous self-assessment, learning and development that together enable the Army to be an adaptive, learning Profession. (p.4) The Role of the Human Resources Sergeant in the Profession of Arms The Human Resources Sergeant, serves as a role model Soldier in terms of Leadership, Army Values and professionalism; with the mission of enhancing the overall strength of the Army at all levels. As part of their responsibilities, Human Resources Sergeants: • Provide Commanders reports that facilitate them in the assessment and validation of the unit’s personnel
Role of the Human Resource Sergeant: Professional A Role of a Human Resource Sergeant in the profession of arms holds a large importance. Non-Commissioned Officers have a role in nearly every aspect of the military. The Army is made up of many different jobs and ranks, but just like the military could not operate successfully without Infantrymen it could not operate without Human Resource Specialist and Sergeants. As Human Resource Sergeants we pride ourselves in knowing we contribute to the military by helping our fellow Soldiers.
According to An Army White Paper: The Profession of Arms “Army leaders below the ranks of sergeant major, colonel, and general officer make their own part of the Army more professional daily even if they don’t control the levers of the major developmental systems, policy, and resources”.
To further validate this, the Army Leadership Regulation (AR 600-100, 2007; 2016 TBP) states that leadership and professional development are complementary, concomitant, deliberate, and continuous. They accrue through the synthesis of education, training, and experience designed to inspire and motivate Soldiers and Army Civilians –trusted Army professionals– to perform present and future duty in accordance with the Army Ethic. It will always be an ongoing process for the development of the character. We have established the three methods of developing the character of the professional, but how do we establish character through education, training, and experience? This paper will delve further detail to the answer as we discuss in detail the three methods of developing the character of the Army
The HR professionals manage and identify people and their appropriate skill sets, assignments opportunities, and specialized training to get personnel to the right location at the correct time (Bennett, 2012). HR professionals are the enforcers of procedures; the procedures are established by leaders for execution (Dempsey, 2010). HR professionals will ensure procedures are disseminated to all personnel at tactical, operational, and strategic levels (Headquarters Department of the Army, 2010). “HR support includes all activities and functions executed within the Army Personnel Life Cycle Model (Acquire, Develop, Distribute, Structure, Deploy, Compensate, Transition, and Sustain) to man the force and provide personnel support and services to Soldiers, their Families, DoD civilians, and contractors” (Headquarters Department of the Army, 2010). The development of Soldiers in the profession make experts ready to execute missions as required and is customary to the armed
“A vision without action is merely a dream.” (Kevin Gates) The Army Profession Model is a great vision but if we do not fixed the basics in our upbringing of Soldiers then it will only be a dream. Imagine a panoramic view of an early morning sunrise over a military base. The sun is starting to burn off the morning dew. Formations of soldiers are starting to pop into the picture. Each soldier is in uniform dress sharp and moving as a single unit. Some formations are double timing moving out. Everyone has a purpose and stepping off to get to his or her next obstacle of the day. All Non-commissioned officers are enforcing nothing less than exceeded standards. Soldiers are toe to line in formations for inspection. Senior Non-commissioned