Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on groupthink
Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Advantages and disadvantages of groupthink
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on groupthink
According to Johnson and Weaver (1992), groupthink is defined as “an unhealthy decision-making pattern characterized by a high degree of cohesiveness and a striving for consensus among the members of a decision making group” (Introduction, para. 1). The authors’ purpose for writing this article is to highlight how the use of groupthink is engrained in our educational system and how detrimental effects occur as a result. From a young age, students are conditioned to solve problems in school and using methods that fit within the norms of behavioral expectations. Johnson and Weaver (1992) mentioned that, “ there is a general unwillingness to question what has been presented in class” (Group Think in the Classroom, para. 6). Furthermore, Johnson …show more content…
Johnson & Weaver (1992) stated that if students are not taught critical thinking, that is to question what is being said by an authority, they cannot learn to make their own connections or develop analytical skills (Changing the Conditions, para. 2). The importance of cohesiveness is not negated. Rather, it is considered an important component to improving the educational paradigm. However, cohesiveness can be achieved by encouraging cooperative argumentation “to form constructive forms of cohesion” (Changing the Conditions, para. 3). Johnson and Weaver (1992) claimed that including small group communication skills “gives students valuable help as they face the choices of the future” Changing the Conditions, para. 5). According to Johnson and Weaver (1992), conflict management skills need to be incorporated into the curriculum in addition to basic interpersonal communication skills in order to better model everyday situations that students are likely to face in the future (Changing the Conditions, para.
A. Preventing "Groupthink" Psychology Today. 20 Apr. 2011. The. Psychology Today.
This accredited notion that group work is going to work faster at producing a better solution to a problem is false. The logic behind this idea—more brainpower which would lead to more ideas then leading to better ideas—is fallacious. We, as a society, have entered into an era where we believe that the best work that is going to be done, is done collectively, not individually. In Quiet by Susan Cain, she calls this new idea “New Groupthink” she then defines it as “a phenomenon that has the potential to stifle productivity at work and to deprive schoolchildren of the skills they’ll need to achieve excellence in an increasingly competitive world. New Groupthink elevates teamwork above all else” (Cain 75).
Groupthink theory is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines, which could have drastic consequences. This results from group polarization where discussions are enhanced or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group’s decision. Therefore, if a group leans towards a risky situation at the beginning on average they will move toward an even riskier position later. (Marks, 2015). The concept that everyone thinks the same question is anyone really thinking. These drastic consequences come from individuals trying to avoid conflict with one another and being highly cohesive give way to questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). This theory seems to new concept, Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims
...ve that the label of Groupthink can be used too loosely. I myself have experienced situations where a Group is too quick to label themselves as sufferers of Groupthink. Although I truly think that Groupthink is a severe problem that exists today, the Challenger being one of the most disastrous of those examples. I believe that we all need to be careful not to be too swift about the use of the Groupthink label. It can be just as negative to a group to label them as wronged in their process when no such error exists as to call them victims of Groupthink. Again the dilemma is that groups need to always be alert to the existence of Groupthink, they also need to not label themselves or other victims of Groupthink unfairly. Although there are many times that Groupthink leads to failure, there are few instances when it works for the food. This is a fine line to walk, but it is most definitely a line that needs to be walked time and time again.
Groupthink is the psychological phenomenon in which groups working on a task think along the same lines which could have drastic results. It is the result of group polarization where discussions are enhance or exaggerate the initial leanings of the group. Therefore, if a group leans towards risky situation at the beginning of the discussion on average they will move toward an even riskier position. (Marks, 2015). The idea when everyone think the same no one is really thinking. The drastic outcomes result from people trying to avoid conflict with one another, being highly cohesive, and results is questionable decision making (Oliver, 2013). Houghton Mifflin publication of Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions
There are eight symptoms of groupthink. The first symptom is when all or most of the group view themselves as invincible which causes them to make decisions that may be risky. The group has an enormous amount of confidence and authority in their decisions as well as in themselves. They see themselves collectively better in all ways than any other group and they believe the event will go well not because of what it is, but because they are involved. The second symptom is the belief of the group that they are moral and upstanding, which leads the group to ignore the ethical or moral consequences of the decisions. The group engages in a total overestimation of its morality. There is never any question that the group is not doing the right thing, they just act. The disregarding of information or warnings that may lead to changes in past policy is the third symptom. Even if there is considerable evidence against their standpoint, they see no problems with their plan. Stereotyping of enemy leaders or others as weak or stupid is the fourth symptom. This symptom leads to close-mindedness to other individuals and their opinions. The fifth symptom is the self-censorship of an individual causing him to overlook his doubts. A group member basically keeps his mouth shut so the group can continue in harmony. Symptom number six refers to the illusion of unanimity; going along with the majority, and the assumption that silence signifies consent. Sometimes a group member who questions the rightness of the goals is pressured by others into concurring or agreeing, this is symptom number seven. The last symptom is the members that set themselves up as a buffer to protect the group from adverse information that may destroy their shared contentment regarding the group’s ...
In this assignment I will be defining the key elements of the "groupthink" phenomenon. This will be accomplished by using examples in order to discuss and evaluate the way in which these negative influences might be combatted. First and foremost, groupthink is a psychological term that was first used in 1972 by a social psychologist named Irvin L Janis. It refers to the practice of making group decisions, which typically results in irrational decision making which affects the final outcome. Illusion of invulnerability
A rapid appraisal was done at the capital of the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National park at Balloch. Observations were made around the surroundings of the national park along with informal conversations with the public who were randomly picked across the park which consisted of locals and tourists. Then after visiting the national park authority helped to gather further information through networking and snowballing help lead to a Key-informant group interview. 2.1.2: Key-informant group interview With the key informants a formal interview was conducted which led to a group interview with members in the tourism, community development and environment departments whose main focuses on different sectors and aspects on managing the park. The
Paulson, E. (2011). Group communication and critical thinking competence development using a reality-based project. (Vol. 74, p. 399). New York, NY: Association for Business Communication Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.proxy-campuslibrary.ashford.edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=7fd005eb-c938-4875-9fcd-bd133741ddf6@sessionmgr115&vid=2&hid=107
You will find many professionals of your industry on LinkedIn. You will also find your friends, family members, classmates, professors, colleagues etc. on this site. You can connect to them by sending invitations. You will find many other like-mind members in specific groups.
Borisoff, D., & Victor, D.A. (1998). Conflict Management: A Communication Skills Approach (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Proponents claim that learners’ academic achievement can be significantly improved with the effectiveness of use of collaborative learning. The active exchange of ideas within small groups increases interest among learners and also promotes critical thinking and deeper levels of understanding of concepts (Benware & Deci, 1984). According to Johnson & Johnson (1986), there is convincing evidence that collaborative teams achieve high level of thoughts and retain information longer than learners who work as individuals. The shared learning gives learners an opportunity to engage in discussion, take responsibility for their own learning, and thus become critical thinkers (Totten, Sills, & Russ, 1991).
In reflection on my learning experience in the group class, I have gained clarity on what sorts of competencies of facilitating group therapy, as well as in what areas social workers and students tend to feel most strong in my practice. Regarding my specific gains in competencies, I feel that I learned the most and was most likely to gain specific group facilitating competencies at the weekly class. Learning in group class is taught me the tools to use to work with groups therapy, communities and also with individuals through the process of changes. In this past three months I think a lot of opportunities have been created to shadowing with (beside and behind) and being a part of group members to learn. In addition, this class has taught me about the skills and how effectively help
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
Groups influence our everyday lives in ways that we don’t even realize. Most of what is learned from groups are societal norms that are being reinforced on a micro level in everyday life. Group influence on individuals is a clear tangible proof of societal norms by institutions. The groups we become a part of therefore can have a greater influence on our individual actions then we are aware of. As an individual we like to believe we have agency over our actions and what we decide but a lot of our own actions is more a part of a group mentality. Also, individual’s go along with a group’s influence so they feel better about themselves because then they won’t be ostracized. This paper will analyze different aspects of individual behavior and