Groundhog Day Movie Analysis

1495 Words3 Pages

Minchin tackles yet another beloved movie with his second theatrical work that hit Broadway this season, Groundhog Day. The musical is based off the 1993 Bill Murray film of the same name. The show follows nearly the same plot as its movie counterpart, weatherman Phil Connors is sent to the small town of Punxsutawney, PA and is forced to relive the same day over and over again until he gets it right. With Minchin’s second project we see that he has found a team of theatrical professionals he enjoys working with and has assembled them again. The only switch to the creative team was the book writer, Dennis Kelly, who was swapped for Danny Rubin (who co-wrote the screenplay the musical is based on). Theatrical artists like to assemble teams that …show more content…

He raved over leading man Andy Karl referring to him as “...the top-of-the-heap musical star he has long deserved to be,” and the show itself, “It is cool (as in hip) and warm (as in cuddly); it is spiky and sentimental,” but found faults with other choices the production made. Brantley wrote that leading women Carlyss Peer, who played Rita Hanson, was “willfully bland,” and goes on to wonder “what a more idiosyncratic actress could have done with the part.” Comparing her to what Annaleigh Ashford made of her similar part in Kinky Boots. “Peter Darling’s choreography still feels oddly unfinished,” Brantley wrote, “[it] could definitely use sharpening and clarification.” Brantley finished by calling the supporting cast “adequate” and “convincingly American,” but saying they lacked “the sort of vibrant individuality that Mr. Karl could use to make sparks with.” His review, although mostly positive towards Andy Karl, offers criticisms to the cast and creative team of the show. His criticisms would seem to be taken seriously, because in his recent review of the Broadway transfer he applauds what he once

More about Groundhog Day Movie Analysis

Open Document