Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Confucius golden rule essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Confucius golden rule essay
Nearly every single major religion out there endorses the Golden Rule and has some type of version of it. And with most of the world being religious it is only logical to say that the Golden Rule is universal. However, regardless of someone’s faith practically everyone is familiar with the straightforward modern interpretation which says to “treat others the way you would want to be treated”. It is still unclear who spoke about this moral code first, but Confucius is probably the most well-known person to have said it. According to a translation of The Analects, the authors state that when Confucius was asked about what may serve as a rule of practice for a person’s life he responds by saying “What you do not want done to yourself, do not do …show more content…
He says to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (New International Version, Matthew 22-39). This is the first appearance of the “Parable of the Good Samaritan” which virtually every person knows. This is candidly stating that since humans love themselves so much, they should love anybody and everybody just as much. So in order to live a righteous Christian life and like a “good Samaritan” you must follow “The Great Commandments”. Therefore, if ⅓ of the world is Christian, then in a literal sense it is reasonable to say that the Golden Rule is already about ⅓ universal with people following Christianity alone. An abolitionist named Angelina Emily Grimke provides another interpretation on the Golden Rule with her book named An Appeal to the Christian Women of the South. It was written 150 years ago, during the era of slavery in America, and in it she tries to plea with the Christian women that encourage slavery. Angelina Grimke questions the thinking of the advocates of slavery and references the golden rule by putting women’s children in the position of the …show more content…
She brilliantly criticizes the hypocrisy behind the views of slavery supporters. She exploits their prejudice and even indirectly calls them cowards. This is the Golden Rule used at its finest because it puts these people in their place. Grimke is showing how if these women are true Christians they must know the Golden Rule. However, they obviously don’t follow it because they support such an inhumane thing while they could never imagine their loved ones or even themselves being enslaved. Slavery is a thing that Jesus would never approve of yet these people did not find it sinful at
...aveholders used the existence of slavery in the Bible as a defense for their actions, instead of adhering to Christian values and renouncing the warped morals of slavery.
Throughout Linda’s life she came to acknowledge that a Christian master was the most dreadful master of all. A Christian master knew the word of God or what we would call the teachings of the Bible, so he was able to intentionally misconstrue biblical verses to his. Yet, white southern “Christians” committed these cruel acts, believing their behaviors were neither wrong nor immoral(BN 1). Looking back at these atrociousness, those who call themselves Christians are appalled. In Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself, Harriet A. Jacobs describes the hypocrisy of Southern, Christian slave owners in order to show that slavery and Christianity are not congruent. Despite the fact that Christianity teaches the values of respect, goodwill and generosity, etc., Christian slave holders seem to think these teachings do not account for them and they do not have to follow them, which is without a doubt hypocritical. African American slavery is reducing a human being to the condition of property, the same as other goods, wares, merchandise and chattels almost like prison if not worse.The treatment of slaves was customarily unfortante because slave masters did not care if their slaves were hurt,tired,hungry, etc they had their profit in mind rather than the well-being of their slaves. Due to the way that
...te a passage of the scripture: “He that knoweth his master’s will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes” (99). This shows that he uses the Bible to justify his pain and suffering onto the slave who does not obey her master. Douglass states, “I assert most unhesitatingly, that the religion of the south is a mere covering for the most horrid crimes, --- a justifier of the most appalling barbarity,--- a sanctifier of the most hateful frauds--- and a dark shelter under, which the darkest , foulest, grossest, and most infernal deeds of slaveholders find the strongest protection” (117). For completing these horrid crimes, slaveholders don’t feel bad for their sinful deeds because they feel like scriptures in the Bible support their abuse. In the narrative, Douglass explains how female slaves were victimized because of they were weaker and easier to abuse.
How can the particularly monstrous slave owners who possess such a despicable stance towards slaves portray themselves to be fully devoted Christians? In this interpretation, Frederick Douglass attempts to address the issues between slavery and Christianity that he had to undergo during his era as a slave. He reveals how the slaveholders during that time span aimed to make a connection by linking the two in order to justify their misbehavior and wickedness towards slaves. Their behavior was undeniable to him and he was repulsed by the way they had no courtesy for the truth of religion. This made him interrogate his faith and judgment in Christianity an insufficient number of times.
Slavery in the Bible is a difficult topic to discuss because our paradigm or idea of slavery is influenced for the most part by the enslavement of Africans in the 17th-19th centuries. This, however, is not the type of slavery that is mentioned in the Bible. Slaves in recent history were more than likely tricked/kidnapped and forced to work. They received no pay and they had no human rights—they were the property of another person, no different than an animal or tool.
What personal qualities were a women in classical China supposed to exhibit? What were her prescribed responsibilities? To what extent were normative gender roles for women in classical India similar? To what extent they were different?
Douglass continues to describe the severity of the manipulation of Christianity. Slave owners use generations of slavery and mental control to convert slaves to the belief God sanctions and supports slavery. They teach that, “ man may properly be a slave; that the relation of master and slave is ordained by God” (Douglass 13). In order to justify their own wrongdoings, slaveowners convert the slaves themselves to Christianity, either by force or gentle coercion over generations. The slaves are therefore under the impression that slavery is a necessary evil. With no other source of information other than their slave owners, and no other supernatural explanation for the horrors they face other than the ones provided by Christianity, generations of slaves cannot escape from under the canopy of Christianity. Christianity molded so deeply to the ideals of slavery that it becomes a postmark of America and a shield of steel for American slave owners. Douglass exposes the blatant misuse of the religion. By using Christianity as a vessel of exploitation, they forever modify the connotations of Christianity to that of tyrannical rule and
The bible, also, condemns many aspects of our current day society and allows for slavery. Rather than taking the bible literally, one should consider the historical context and then adjust to today’s norms.
life: the Golden Rule. The Golden Rule states “do unto others as you would have them do unto
...e that chattel slavery was a cruel, perverse institution that no human should ever have to endure. Most people realize today how hypocritical it was to call oneself a Christian, while treating slaves so horribly. Throughout her book, Harriet Jacobs, in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, Written by Herself, revealed Americans everywhere that slave owners were hypocrites, and calling themselves Christians was perhaps the greatest sin of all.
Religion is often something people turn to during times of difficulty. During the times of enslavement, Christianity was a double edged sword. The Angela Davis edition of Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs’ Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, illustrate how religion, mainly Christianity, was immensely complex and moved from one extreme to the other. When preaching Christianity to the slaves, slaveholders emphasized the Bible’s passages teaching obedience and pacifism. Thus, slaveholders used religion to justify their brutal actions and condone slavery. Douglass and Jacobs demonstrate the moral contradiction between slavery and Christianity, thereby illustrating that slaves must be able to alienate themselves from
"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." [Matthew 22:37-40, AV]
... the Biblical rule that states, “Do unto others as you would have done unto you.” Instead, we continually show that there should be no tolerance or understanding of any wrongdoing committed against us.
Philip J. Ivanhoe. Confucian moral self cultivation. New York : P. Lang, vol. 3, 1993.
Analects, a compilation of Confucius’ teachings, is greatly recognized as a work of utmost importance and influence in the Chinese culture. The book conveys Confucius’ beliefs on a wide variety of topics, including propriety, education, family relations, and government in efforts to enhance social order.