Everyone has once experienced an incident when their plan backfired on them and ended up hurting them more than helping them. In the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, it seems like nobody’s plans work out the they intended them to. The idea of plans going sour is a recurring theme that seems to result in a majority of the characters deaths. Some schemes are intentionally turned against individuals, while others are a matter of coincidence. Either way the theme of plans backfiring helps shape the end result of the play. The first case of someone’s plans going awry is when Hamlet stabs the curtain that Polonius is conveniently standing behind. Hamlet doesn’t exactly know who is behind the curtain, “Nay, I know not, Is it the King?” (Shakespeare 3.4.32). Hamlet hopes that the person that he slain was the …show more content…
In their case, it is Hamlet 's intention to make sure Rosencrantz and Guildenstern 's plan works against them. Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s mission is to make sure that Hamlet goes to England to be killed, Hamlet takes it upon himself to ensure their heads are on the chopping block, not his. Hamlet does this by taking the letter that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are going to give to the king of England and replacing it. The letter that Hamlet replaces it with says that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are the ones to be killed. Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are out of the picture this allows for Hamlet to return to Denmark to continue his plot of revenge on the King. When Hamlet returns back to Denmark Horatio asks Hamlet if he feels that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s deaths are a burden to him. Hamlet replies, “Why, man, they did make love to this employment. / They are not near my conscience. Their defeat / Does by their own insinuation grow” (Shakespeare 5.2.64-66). Since Hamlet is back in Denmark, this allows for Laertes to attempt to gain revenge on the murderer of his
Hamlet questions what may or may not happen however Laertes just wants the revenge fast and effective. Although these characters have different standards when it comes to revenge, they both immediately blamed and directed their anger towards Claudius when they found out their father’s were dead. Hamlet’s reason to blame Claudius is simply because he is his father’s murderer. In 1.5 while Hamlet is talking to the ghost of his father he says, “Haste me to know ’t, that I, with wings as swift/As meditation or the thoughts of love/May sweep to my revenge” (Shakespeare 1.5.31-33). At first is seems as if Hamlet would seek revenge right away because he seems eager to find out who the killer is and when he does find out he says he knew it was Claudius all along. He is furious and after this part in the play, Hamlet’s anger is mainly focused on Claudius. On the other hand when Laertes found out Polonius is dead he went straight to Claudius assuming it was him. By doing this he shows that he is controlled by his impulses unlike Hamlet who waited until he got proof to act on his fury. Laertes also blamed Claudius for not giving his father a proper burial, which can relate to Hamlet’s anger too because Hamlet felt as if there was not enough mourning for his father death. Not only did they both lose their fathers, but they both lost Ophelia, a female figure in their lives that they both loved.
...m to put his life in danger to find out more information about Hamlet, which ultimately leads to his death. Claudius also planted the idea of murdering Hamlet into Laertes’ mind, and this became the main goal of Laertes towards the end, which leads him to his death. Hamlet has hurt the women that he loves, both Ophelia and Gertrude die. Claudius and Hamlet also die, which is ultimately how the corruption of the nation of Denmark ends, through this it can once again be the great nation that it once was.
In terms of Hamlet's own philosophic view, the killing of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is very out-of-character. Hamlet is an intellectual, and therefore believes that killing is not a necessary solution (this could also relate to why he hesitates so long at killing Claudius). He does this more out of anger and revenge than out of his own will and good judgement. As somewhat of a justification he says,
Hamlet. The son of a king. A man who could have had it all, but instead he chose the much more painful route of revenge and a life of bloodshed. The downfall of Hamlet is comparable to trying to hide a lie one has told. The deeper we try to cover the lie, the worse it gets and harder it becomes to do the right thing. The deeper the reader explores into Hamlets life, the messier and messier it becomes. With a mind full of suicidal thoughts and insanity with no effort to contain it can only lead one thing, and Hamlets downfall is the ultimate example. Pain, suffering, and extreme
Both Hamlet’s and Laertes’ fathers were killed. When Laertes discovered that his father’s been murdered he immediately assumes that Claudius is the killer. As a result of his speculation he moves to avenge Polonius’ death. Laertes lines in Act IV Scene 5 provide insight into his mind displaying his desire for revenge at any cost. “To hell, allegiance! Vows, to the blackest devil! Conscience and grace, to the profoundest pit! I dare damnation. To this point I stand, that both worlds I give to negligence, let come what comes, only I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father.” (Act IV Scene 5 lines 136-141) In contrast to Laertes speculation of his father’s killer, Hamlet assumes the individual spying on his conversation with Gertrude is Claudius. “Nay, I know not. Is it the King?” (Act III Scene 4 line 28). Without thinking, Hamlet automatically thrusts out attempting to kill who he believed was Claudius and actually kills Polonius. Fury and frustration instigate Hamlet’s and Laertes’ indiscreet actions and causes them not to think of the consequences that may follow.
Claudius uses Laertes to do his dirty work. Claudius is basically working behind the scene of this murder. He wants Hamlet dead because he feels Hamlet coming on to him. Claudius says, “Oh for two special reasons.”(Shakespeare4.7.9-24) Claudius wants Laertes to kill Hamlet. He knows that he really can’t punish Hamlet or put him away because of Gertrude and his royal standards. He didn’t want to hurt Gertrude any type of way because he loves her unconditionally. He also couldn’t punish him because Hamlet is in a public court and all the people love him and that would look bad for Claudius because everything would fall on him and the people will hate him for it. Claudius is a snake in the grass and waiting for his prey to come along so he can
In today’s society, people read books because they want to learn new things, because they are bored, or even because they like reading books. There are many genres in books, some books might sad, depressing, happy, and much more. In the case of Hamlet, there are many emotions that appeal to the audience emotions. Some of which include: sympathy, sadness, depressed and much more in Act 1, Scene 5 this scene is full of emotion but what can be mostly interpreted in this scene is sympathy, and sadness. The use of pathos is mostly seen in this scene because of the words being used, by the tone of the monologue, and by showing the ghost of his dead father. All these uses listed above make the monologue have an impact on the audience which causes
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are both spies paid by Claudius to pretend to be Hamlet’s friends. Although they are minor yet exhilarating characters, they used to bring light on the stories around them especially since the play; “Hamlet” is a tragic one. King Claudius pays these two from Wittenberg to spy on Hamlet and be friends with him to know why He started behaving weird and acting mad. Shakespeare created these characters to provide deep information about the main character, Hamlet, to Claudius and to we the audience. The news of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s death came after the deaths of the royal family because they are the main characters.
Throughout Hamlet, each character’s course of revenge surrounds them with corruption, obsession, and fatality. Shakespeare shows that revenge proves to be extremely problematic. Revenge causes corruption by changing an individual’s persona and nature. Obsession to revenge brings forth difficulties such as destroyed relationships. Finally, revenge can be the foundation to the ultimate sacrifice of fatality. Hamlet goes to show that revenge is never the correct route to follow, and it is always the route with a dead
In Hamlet Shakespeare is able to use revenge in an extremely skillful way that gives us such deep insight into the characters. It is an excellent play that truly shows the complexity of humans. You can see in Hamlet how the characters are willing to sacrifice t...
From this play we learn of the difficulty associated with taking a life as Hamlet agonises as to how and when he should kill Claudius and furthermore whether he should take his own life. Hamlet being a logical thinker undergoes major moral dilemma as he struggles to make accurate choices. From the internal conflict that the playwright expresses to us it is evident that it can kill someone, firstly mentally then physically. The idea of tragedy is explored in great detail through conflict where the playwright’s main message is brought across to the audience; Shakespeare stresses to his audience the point that conflict be it internal or external it can bring upon the downfall of great people and in turn have them suffer a tragic fate. It is Shakespeare’s aim to show us the complexity of man and that moral decisions are not easily made.
Like all Shakespearean tragedies, Hamlet’s ending is no different in end-result. Hamlet’s separation from society and his self-imposed confusion caused by over-thinking results in the unnecessary deaths of most of the major characters. In turn, Hamlet’s pre-occupation with factors inessential to his mission of revenge slows down his action. It is this internal struggle that illustrates the intensity and complexity of Shakespeare’s revenge tragedy, something that is often looked at from a psychological perspective.
Once Hamlet learned or even suspected that Claudius murdered his father, he should have prepared for anything. Instead, Hamlet enters a deep personal reflection on morals and what is right and wrong. This gives an opening for Claudius, who says”And for his death no wind of blame shall breathe/ but even his mother shall cunchange the practice/ and call it an accident”. Despite the rather clear evidence Hamlet has gathered of Claudius’ corruption, Hamlet’s lack of action and emotional breakdown opens himself up to easy manipulation. As his madness becomes apparent to all those around him, he allows himself to be sent to England despite the obvious that Claudius is plotting something. He should have known that his enemy knows the truth and fortunately, barely escapes death. As time passes, it’s clear that Hamlet is losing all sense of caution in rationality when he decides to have a fencing match with the man who already tried to kill him. All of the actions taken by both Claudius and Laertes clearly show there intent to kill, but Hamlet becomes obnoxiously trusting. Although being trusting of others isn’t a bad quality, it is definitely not something you want to take up with your enemies. Hamlet’s overall lack of motivation to defend himself becomes too apparent, he had many opportunities to win this war of deception, but caused his own
For Guildenstern and Rosencrantz to betray Hamlet the way they did is utterly despicable. Especially considering that their taking the orders from Claudius. Claudius turns out to be quite a good lire, and shows his skill of being able to manipulate people, into doing what he wants. "Welcome, dear Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Moreover that we much did long to see you, the need we have to use you did provoke our hasty sending". ( II;ii; 1-4). Since Rosencrantz and Guildenstern spied on Hamlet, and brought back the fact that he is mad to Claudius. Claudius could then figure out Hamlet’s next move, and counter act it with his own. " Was not like madness. There’s something in his soul." ( III; i; 161). If Claudius hadn’t had Guildenstern or Rosencrantz to aid him in his efforts, I think Hamlet could have had a chance at survival.
Hamlet is the best known tragedy in literature today. Here, Shakespeare exposes Hamlet’s flaws as a heroic character. The tragedy in this play is the result of the main character’s unrealistic ideals and his inability to overcome his weakness of indecisiveness. This fatal attribute led to the death of several people which included his mother and the King of Denmark. Although he is described as being a brave and intelligent person, his tendency to procrastinate prevented him from acting on his father’s murder, his mother’s marriage, and his uncle’s ascension to the throne.