Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Important of a writing process
Importance of writing
Important of a writing process
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Important of a writing process
The article talks of George Orwell’s motivation behind writing, including the uglier sides of it. Orwell speaks of many points for the thought process of an author. It may be a tiring, draining process but is fueled by love and passion, though the kind of passion can vary. He states writing should never seem like task, or chore to do. However, it is not wholly a selfless endeavour; writing by some merit is driven by vanity, a sense of need to be remember or leave an impact of the world. Personal conflicts are a tightrope to be balanced on in writing, for the personality and opinions of the author must bleed in and color the words yet not overwhelm and consume the piece. The article states that aesthetic enthusiasm is another force behind the writing, this be the appeal a story brings to a wide audience through beauty within and surrounding the writing. The ways all these clash and blend to create a story, as Orwell says, “It can be seen how these various impulses must war against one another, and how they must fluctuate from person to person and from time to time.” Most of all, writing is a creative process that one must love with an intensity, or else what is the point to begin with? …show more content…
This contradicts Orwell, who says one should, to a degree, focus on the appeal a story needs to bring to a wide audience. Steinbeck builds on the momentum a creative spree can offer and how any attempt lessen it whether this be through editing while writing, focusing solely on the end goal instead the process, or becoming too sentimentally attached to a scene. Unlike Orwell, he states the flaws in this and how writing is a process that impossible to categorize giving a new insight to the process with a simple
` Even though Steinbecks essay could be considered a dated opinion being written in the 19 hundreds. it goes to show his considerably harsh outlook hasn't sadly strayed from our reality all that much from its original publishment. He makes a statement “We are restless, a dissatisfied, a searching people.” Steinbeck may seem brutal and disappointed. but when reading you get a surprising tone of disapproval that doesn't sound hateful. It’s cruel but almost disapproving in a condescending way. He also makes a statement “We are self-reliant and at the same time completely dependent. We are aggressive, and defenseless.”
Orwell himself is the one who coined the term of political purpose, and because of this, he seems to be the best person to compare other writers to when discussing political purpose. Orwell defined political purpose as, “Desire to push the world in a certain direction,” and he writes, “…no book is genuinely free from political bias. The opinion that art should have nothing to do with politics is itself a political attitude” (3). Orwell, therefore, believes that art is ultimately political in purpose whether that was the intention or not. He believes that no work can be “free from political bias.” He seems to be of the opinion that art must have political purpose or else it will be “lifeless,” much like his earlier writing. Alternately,
Steinbeck’s word choice has a very significant impact on the effectiveness of his writing. By using words and phrases like “junk man,” “dead terror,” and the repetition of the words “bitterness” and “dead,” he drives his point home in a very matter-of-fact sort of way.
it has operatives all over keeping an eye out for cops or law enforcement, this
Steinbeck went through many trials throughout his lifetime (French). He went through a lot of phases in his life that were not easy to deal with (French). Although not all of his life experiences were good, they all helped him to improve his writing. This is comparable to the saying "Whatever does not kill you, makes you stronger." This is the case with Steinbeck, because all of his experiences made him stronger, not only in his life, but in his writing. Several things that improved his writing through life experiences were, when he was a ranch hand, when he was a marine biologist, and when he wrote war transcripts during World War Two. These examples were all used in Steinbeck's writing, thus proving that Steinbeck used his life experiences in his works.
1) The device Orwell uses to introduce his thesis are chiasmi. The first chiasmus is “A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks” and the second chiasmus is “It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” Both sentences are examples of chiasmus since they reverse key terms in their clauses, the key terms being “drinking” and “failure” in the first, and the state of the language and “foolish thoughts” in the second sentence.
The tone of Orwell’s essay is formal. Throughout the entire essay, Orwell is informative and professional to achieve ethos. Orwell stays professional even when he is expressing his feelings, for example, in this passage, “In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not true, it will generally be found that the writer is some kind of rebel, expressing his private opinions and not a ‘party line’. Orthodoxy, of whatever colour, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style. The political dialects to be found in pamphlets, leading articles, manifestos, white papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, of course, vary from party to party, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, vivid, homemade turn of speech.” Orwell does not veer off topic and continues to be
John Steinbeck is one of America’s favorite American Modernist authors. His work deals with the struggle of life, mostly during the Great Depression Era and are centered in and around California. Fortunately for his readers, Steinbeck suffered some of the atrocities his characters suffered in order to bring them his rich experiences with the text. Due to his well-developed characters, pastoral settings, and internal conflicts, high school students and adults can appreciate his writing style.
Winston Smith follows the traditional path of a hero 's journey. O’Brien calls him to adventure calling to him in a dream. The threshold crossing is when Winston buys the little black journal from the old antique shop. It was his first secret act against the Party. His mentor is O’Brien, and Winston clings to the words from his dream for hope. He meets Julia who is of great help to motivate Winston and encourage his independent thinking. For too long, Winston had depended on the Party to do the thinking. He went through life almost without having to think, but since his journey he has learned to search for truth and question the doctrine of society. Winston discovered, “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.” (Orwell 81).”
...e exists a popular saying, “write what you know.” John Grisham, writer of The Firm, effectively wrote a novel about lawyers because he practiced as one. People communicate what they interpret as the truth, but this habit is not limited to writing. Along with writing drenched with bias, members of the society must be conscious of the biases of those they associate with; this is due to the likelihood of those biases affecting themselves subconsciously. For a society to progress, it is vital that its members do not have their course of life and decisions influenced by the biases others formed due to their personal experiences. English is global; with numerous variations of the language making Orwell’s statements inapplicable; however, an open minded approach to the essay can be constructive seeding intelligent thoughts into society, as Orwell hoped for it to accomplish.
As John Steinbeck experienced life in Ameria he recorded his observation, his enjoyment of life, and his belief in human goodness. Several of his works are now considered classics. His books differ in content and in form, “Of Mice and Men” is similar to a play and “The Sea of Cortez” is a scientific account. But Steinbeck wrote all of his books with a particular goal in mind. As he explained, “My whole work drive as been aimed at making people understand each other.”
In his novel, “1984,” George Orwell warns us against three things. He stated that people are only out for personal gain, and will use any means to reach their goals. He also warned against these types of people who are already in power. And lastly, he warns us against the lost of privacy through constant surveillance, and how we actually allow this to happen.
Political language "is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind "according to George Orwell, who believed that the language used is meaningless and its intention is to hide the truth by those who exercise political power. The essay "Politics and the English Language" became a powerful work for the writers, journalists and teachers, thus the author creates a “poetics” for political language appointing the main rules and problems that determine the truth not to be said. While reading George Orwell’s essay I agreed and disagreed with his opinions and solutions for an improved English, consequently, I gathered evidence to prove my claim which is versatile because during
Based on the two essays, George Orwell is a vivid writer who uses a unique point of view and strong themes of pride and role playing to convey his messages. His writings are easy to pick out because of the strengths of these messages. Just like politicians in government, people with power turn corrupt to stay in power and keep their reputations. Anyone who takes on power must be prepared to live with the consequences of his actions. Orwell knows this challenge well and conveys this principle in his writing. After all, his narration is based on real life experiences and not fictional fantasies.
...on to produce novels. But authors cannot just write whatever it comes to their mind, they have to image what interest their readers might have. As stated by Swerdlow, writers often have to prompt other people to think as they read “It’s something that you must do even if you do not have the leisure of being in prison. To write, you must work methodically, forming your thoughts and prompting other people to think as they read. Writing requires work at both ends. That’s what makes writing special” (42). Subsequently, writing is not an easy task by any means, but it helps us express important aspects of our persona.