George Orwell Shooting An Elephant

469 Words1 Page

In “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, Orwell is faced with the issue of having to shoot a mad elephant. Orwell starts off his essay by discussing the hatred that the Burmese have for Europeans, especially the British. The locals show their disdain for Orwell by tripping him during a soccer game or insulting him. Orwell understands the Burmese’s hatred on one hand, but on the other wants to “drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest's guts” (Orwell ****). Orwell’s relationship with the natives is especially illustrated when an elephant goes “must” starts destroying a bazaar (Maybe citation ***). Orwell is unsure of what to do and tries to assess the situation. First, he is uncertain of whether or not the elephant exists due to conflicting …show more content…

He felt that, because he was already not liked, he had no choice but to kill the elephant. Orwell’s feeling of peer pressure to kill the elephant can be translated in modern times as well. For instance, the peer pressure to try drugs and fear of being ridiculed for not doing so is much like Orwell’s situation. It saddened me that Orwell decided to kill the elephant, but with over 2,000 people watching him, he had no choice. I can relate to him giving in to peer pressure, because when people expect something of you, it is hard not to follow through. Orwell sets up his essay to reflect his experience of killing the elephant to his experiences with imperialism. The elephant symbolizes the locals and how the locals act towards the British. The elephant was tame, but after being in chains for a long time period, he became angry, much like the Burmese. Orwell also shot the elephant while it was peacefully eating grass. The elephant getting shot while being peaceful symbolizes how the Burmese do not deserve to be subjugated by the British. Orwell furthers the cycle of brutish imperialism by shooting the innocent elephant, just like the innocent Indian people had been

Open Document