George Atzerodt Not Fair Essay

677 Words2 Pages

George Atzerodt punishment and trial were unjust. He did not have a fair trial because the people were biased to the union. He also didn’t get the punishment he deserved his crime because of the trial being unjust. He was forced to kill the vice president but he backed out of it.

George Atzerodt did not have a fair trial. Some people might say that the trial was fair. Consequently his trial was not fair was because it was a time of war so the trial had military officer. The military officer were from the union and George Atzerodt was from the confederate. This made the trial unjust because the military officer were union biased and they wanted George Atzerodt to lose. Another reason why the trial is unfair was because the trial conducted by the said Judge Advocate General as recorder aided by Assistant and Special Judge Advocate as he made designate. The …show more content…

It can be argued that the punishment for George Atzerodt was fair. This is not true because he was charged for conspiring to kill the vice president. The punishment that George Atzerodt was given was to be hanged. This is not the crime that George Atzerodt should have been given because he backed out of killing the vice president but he got punished because he knew about assassination plan to kill Abraham Lincoln. The punishment for his crime was not fair because in the U.S code of law says that if two or more persons conspire to kill or kidnap any individual (president of the united states, president elect, or the vice president) or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life. In the U.S code of law it says that the punishment for conspiring to kill the president, president elect, vice president is imprisonment for any term of years or for life. This is why the punishment for George Atzerodt’s crime was not fair which makes the trial

More about George Atzerodt Not Fair Essay

Open Document