Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Genetic counselling essay
Essay on the need for genetic counselling
Genetic counselling essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Genetic counselling essay
Genetic Counseling If I was a genetic counselor working with a couple who just had a child with Tay-Sachs disease, I would first explain that it is an inherited genetic disease. It would be important to explain the lineage of the disease and how if they were to trace their ancestry, it would most like trace back to European Jews. People of this decent have a 1 in 27 chance of being a carrier. Testing of the parents to see if they are carriers would not be necessary. I would explain that they are definitely both carriers because the only way to have a child with Tay-Sachs is to receive the defective gene from both parents and the two defective genes are now affecting each cell inside of their baby. Furthermore, I would discuss the Tay-Sachs disease itself. I would explain to the couple that the disease is caused by a mutation of the hexosaminidase A (HEXA) enzyme that has been altered. Because the parents would not understand this – I would explain the function of the HEXA gene and how it is responsible for the breakdown of fatty substances in the brain. Explanation would also include …show more content…
As a counselor, it would be very important for me to explain the chances of their future children having the disease. Since both parents are known carriers now, there is a 1 in 4 chance of their children having Tay-Sachs disease. There is a 2 in 4 chance their child will be only a carrier. If the couple were to divorce and marry someone that has had genetic testing and is not a carrier, there would be no chance of having a child with the disease, but would still have a 2 in 4 chance of having a child that is also a carrier of the disease. Genetic and prenatal testing would help plan future pregnancies. Another option for the parent would be to implantation. The embryos tested and then when a healthy embryo is found not to have the disorder, it would be implanted for a hopefully healthy
Due to this disease the body is slowly broken down by affecting the central nervous system of a person’s body. The children depicted in the essay are probably an example how fellow human beings should be around a disabled person. They just view the disabled person as another human being and respect them the same way. The children are proud to associate themselves with Mairs and do not shy away from introducing her to the general public. This is what a disabled person requires: that all those around him or her should respect them for what they are and give them unconditional regard
Tay-Sachs disease is a rare hereditary disease found mainly in infants but is also found in juveniles and adults. It is caused by the abnormal metabolism of fats and is characterized by mental deterioration, blindness, and paralysis. There is no available treatment for this disease.
Tay-Sachs disease is a rare and fatal genetic disorder that destroys neurons in the brain and spinal cord. The disease appears in three forms, Juvenile Onset, Late Onset (known as LOTS), and the most common form, Infantile (also known as Classic). The differences between the three forms of the disease are related to the age at which the symptoms of the disease begin to form. Tay-Sachs results from a deficiency of the enzyme hexosaminidase A, which plays a vital role in removing a fatty substance, called GM2 gangliosides, from neurons.
Tay-Sachs disease is a neurodegenerative disorder that is known to be genetically inherited. Both children and adults may suffer from this neurological disease, but it is most common in children (Percy, 1999). This disease causes abnormal brain development in individuals who are affected by this disease. This disease is known to get progressively worse, and unfortunately leads to death. Due to the rapid progression of this disease, the life expectancy is no more than five-six years of age due to complications related to the disorder (Percy, 1999).
In the book it says "They can spend a whole lifetime worrying whether they 're carriers, and then we come along and offer them a test. Recessives and X-linked. Look what they 're doing with fragile-X nowadays. And cystic fibrosis. Just imagine the commercial possibilities if you can design and patent a probe for something like Gaucher 's disease...(69)" Recessive traits is the phenotype is seen only a homozygous recessive genotype for the traits of the interest is present. The booked talked about two of three diseases that are most common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The first one is Cystic fibrosis which is an inherited life-threatening disorder that effects the lungs and the digestive system. The other one mention in the book that wasn’t mention in class was Gaucher 's disease. Gaucher 's disease is a build up of fatty substances in your organs, usually in you spleen and liver. Which causes them to become bigger affecting their function. The last one that we learned in class was Tay-Sachs disease, which is a rare inherited disorder that destroys nerve cells in the brain and spinal
Human Genetic Screening and Discrimination in Gattaca. Works Cited Missing A few months ago I watched a movie called Gattaca, which dealt with the issue of genetic discrimination in the near future. In the movie, people were separated into two classes, those that were genetically screened and positively altered before birth and the class that was unaltered. The separate classes had stark divisions, from what jobs that you were able to apply for to where you could eat. Security was aimed at keeping unaltered people away from the enhanced people.
The key thing that I learned from this story was that every pregnant women being given standard prenatal screening should be educated on certain genetic disease that she may have an increased risk of giving to her children. Each women should be told what each genetic test is, what they test for, and what they don't test for. It should not be assumed that they have any information on a genetic disorder unless it was stated otherwise prior to the screening. I learned that education is important because Emily thought that the chance of her child having Tay-Sachs was "infinitesimal" because she was not educated about how genetic diseases are inherited. Even though through this education the disease could not have been prevented it could have better
Tay-sachs disease is perhaps a very dramatic disease because it strikes most keenly at small children and babies. The disease is very rare and fatal. Tay-sachs is a genetic disorder in which harmful amounts of fatty lipids, known as ganglioside GM2, is built up in the nerve cells in the brain. Infants who with Tay-sachs disease, who are not carriers, appear to develop normally for the first few months since their birth, but as the nerve cells become swollen with the fatty material, a severe decline of mental and physical abilities occurs. The child then becomes deaf, blind, and unable to swallow.
A genetic family history assessment contains information about family structure and relationships. A typical nurse will use a three-generation family pedigree to gather the information. By doing so, nurses can be aware of which family members are at risk for disorders from a genetic component. Therefore, they can be provided with lifestyle advice, recommendations, and referrals to appropriate specialists (Kaakinen, Coehlo, Steele, Tabacco & Hanson, 2015). A genetic family history assessment will be provided about my family.
I believe Deb should get genetic testing done for a few reasons. First of all the test would allow Deb to prepare and start to limit a potential disease. In the story it states that "at some point Deb would like to know her Cancer risk." That statement leads me to believe she would like the test conducted at some point as that's one of the few ways she can find out her risk. I feel the bioethical principal that represents this situation is the respect for patients principle. It is entirely up to Deb if she wants to have the test completed and no one should try to influence her decision. I also like to think if a cancer gene is found in Deb she will start preparing be starting a possible treatment plan and also start financial planning for the disease as she will have to pay some money to have the
In this paper, I will argue that genetic therapies should be allowed for diseases and disabilities that cause individuals pain, shorter life spans, and noticeable disadvantages in life. I believe this because everyone deserves to have the most even starting place in life as possible. That is no being should be limited in their life due to diseases and disabilities that can be cured with genetic therapies. I will be basing my argument off the article by “Gene Therapies and the Pursuit of a Better Human” by Sara Goering. One objection to genetic therapies is that removing disabilities and diseases might cause humans to lose sympathy towards others and their fragility (332). However, I do not believe this because there are many other events and conditions in society that spark human compassion and sympathy towards others.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
In recent years, genetic testing has become a popular topic in the media. Usually involving cheek swabs, blood samples, or amniotic fluid samples, the procedure is relatively simple and can help diagnose genetic disorders, determine ideal medication types, or simply determine the patient’s heritage. It has saved many lives from cancer and other afflictions, but to say that genetic testing is always the correct choice is false. There are many issues with the tests, considering that they are new to the medical world. Genetic testing is mostly harmful because of privacy concerns, how underdeveloped it is, and the risk of it pushing a mother to abort her child.
The desire to have a "normal" child is held by every parent and only now are we beginning to have the ability to select for that child. In preparation to receiving genetic testing, the parents are required to meet with a genetic counselor. A detailed description of the testing methods are reviewed with the couple as well as the risks which are involved with each. Upon an understanding of the procedures, the counselor discusses the many possible outcomes which could be the result of the diagnosis. Finally, before any tests are performed, anxieties from either of the parents are addressed as well as the psychological well-being of the parents.
Using gene editing for gene therapy to help people with genetic diseases, such as Tay Sachs or cystic fibrosis, is a benefit that may be worth the slight risks that come with gene editing. When it comes to rare situations in which both parents suffer from the same recessive genetic disorder, germline editing may be the only way to guarantee that their child doesn’t end up with that genetic disorder. These diseases can be treated with somatic cell therapy but with germline cell therapy, children wouldn’t develop these diseases in the first place. In this case, the normative ethical theory of consequentialism, and more specifically, utilitarianism would apply because using gene editing for the benefit of curing people of genetic diseases outweighs the possible risks that may come with it. This pertains to the utilitarian principle that one must do whatever produces the greatest net happiness, therefore the greatest net happiness would be a healthy person free of any genetic disorder. According to Kantian’s formula of universal law, if someone has a genetic disorder then they can use CRISPR to remove the gene causing it. I believe this maxim may apply to everyone in this particular situation. Having an opportunity to treat cancer, save children from genetic diseases, and understand diabetes offers justification to push forward on the idea of CRISPR. However, it