Generation Like Analysis

1447 Words3 Pages

Generation Like: A Foucauldian and Bourdieusian Analysis In Frontline’s 2014 documentary “Generation Like,” Douglas Rushkoff delves into the online world of social media that youth engage in, and how these young consumers perceptions and realtionships with cooprations and each other unfold. In Bourdieu’s model of cultural production and power, the online field in which youth engage can be understood through its dynamic values and rules for social enagement. Alternatively, Foucault’s framework of power, provides a way of understanding the extent and shifting nanture of coporate power and the relational interactions with young consumers. Furthermore Foucult’s model of disciplinary power can lend insight into youth’s perceptions of these relationships …show more content…

Due to a ubiqitous notion of power- corporations do not hold complete- hirarchiarcal power over these individual youth consumers. These youth consumers themselves are also creating power as power to can be seen as a productive force. This productive force of power is constantly creating in the online realm. This creation is two fold and on one end to youth: appears to be creative ocntent, however on the other end economic gains are being made thorugh the mining of extensive data about consumers. Power relations then are being negotiated at many levels between youth and between youth and coorporations in this way as well. In this way power is at every level, every turn and thus makes everyone subject to social media’s power in some shape or …show more content…

Building off of this notion of capilary power, most people can recognize the power interactions especially with money and economic capital involved. its This power seeks to act in diciplinary ways, while different from state sactioned diciple, it is rather self enforced as youth are choosing to engage, and doing so daily. This constant engagement builds and fluctuates off of youth’s perceptions in order to not only keep people engaged but keep them incorporated into the advertising machines. For the many examples they gave of youtube stars or fan girls these brands are essentially using youth social media engagement as an extended platform for advertising and thus also collectiing data and money. As Gilliom and Monahan noted in thinking about a surveilance society “…whereas Foucault thought that reproducing the panopticon model throughout societies would subject everyone to a uniform disciplining gaze, surveillance systems today are geared more toward finding or creating cliffercnces among people and sorting them into finely differentiated categories (according to risk, value, preference, class, status, age, sex, race, and so on). Gilliom,

Open Document