Pros and Cons of waiting before removing the gallbladder The main objective of treating Mrs. D’Angelo is to alleviate her of pain, rid her of symptoms, and to cure her gallbladder issue. The cons of waiting to remove her gallbladder would involve prolonging the disease, symptoms and pain for the patient. In addition, the delay could subject her to more severe conditions or even possibly death. The cons of waiting would have a tremendous impact on the health of this individual patient. The pros would be the short term savings of not performing the procedure and attention to other patients who have more insurance coverage and would generate more revenue than Medicaid patients. Also, other more cost-efficient treatment options could be considered by the …show more content…
Research substantiates the access for care and procedures presented to privately insured patients is typically of better quality. According to Dayaratna (2012), Ph.D. in a Heritage Foundation article, “A number of academic studies over the years have illustrated that Medicaid patients have consistently had poor access to care and that Medicaid fails to meet important needs” (Dayaratna, 2012). This statement highlights the fact that privately insured patients do receive better treatment. Because of this undisputed fact, the term “better treatment” is defined as higher quality of care with superior access and positive health outcomes. Do you think that Medicaid should review their policy on whether this condition and similar ones like it should be classified as an elective surgery, that is, should Medicaid make such diagnosis/condition required or non-elective surgery? Constant review and consideration of the clinical implications of elective and non-elective surgeries both are necessary to determine the affects on the patient’s health. The fact that a disparity exists between privately insured patients’ access to procedures versus Medicaid recipients is unethical and should be
In the plaintiff’s suit, he alleged the surgery did not go well because the hospital had hired a surgeon, who was not competent or qualified enough to perform the surgery therefore; the hospital was just as negligent as the doctor was. Before the trial date, Dr. Salinsky and his insurance company, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, settled with plantiff out of court on the basis they will be released from the suit upon payment of $140,000 (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). Although, Salinsky settled with plaintiff prior to trial, there was still “question of whether he was negligent in the manner in which he performed the operation on July 11, 1975, remained an issue at trial, as it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove that Salinsky was negligent in this respect to establish a
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is established as the primary procedure for the vast majority of patients with benign gall bladder disease, both in elective and emergency conditions.The ability to accurately identify an individual patient’s risk for conversion based on preoperative factors
The facts bear out the conclusion that the way healthcare in this country is distributed is flawed. It causes us to lose money, productivity, and unjustly leaves too many people struggling for what Thomas Jefferson realized was fundamental. Among industrialized countries, America holds the unique position of not having any form of universal health care. This should lead Americans to ask why the health of its citizens is “less equal” than the health of a European.
Providers must act in the best interest of the patient and their basic obligation is to do no harm and work for the public’s wellbeing. A physician shall always keep in mind the obligation of preserving human life. Providers must communicate full, accurate and unbiased information so patients can make informed decisions about their health care. As a result of their recommendations, providers are responsible for generating costs in health care but do not generate the need for those expenses. Every hospital has both an ethical as well as a legal responsibility to provide care, even if the care may be uncompensated.
Sarpel, U., Vladeck, B. C., Divino, C. M., & Klotman, P. E. (2008). Fact and Fiction: Debunking Myths in the US Healthcare System. Annals of Surgery, 247(4), 563-569. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318159d566
The United States (U.S.) has a health care system that is much different than any other health care system in the world (Nies & McEwen, 2015). It is frequently recognized as one with most recent technological inventions, but at the same time is often criticized for being overly expensive (Nies & McEwen, 2015). In 2010, President Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, n.d.) This plan was implemented in an attempt to make preventative care more affordable and accessible for all uninsured Americans (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, n.d.). Under the law, the new Patient’s Bill of Rights gives consumers the power to be in charge of their health care choices. (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, n.d.).
In order to make ones’ health care coverage more affordable, the nation needs to address the continually increasing medical care costs. Approximately more than one-sixth of the United States economy is devoted to health care spending, such as: soaring prices for medical services, costly prescription drugs, newly advanced medical technology, and even unhealthy lifestyles. Our system is spending approximately $2.7 trillion annually on health care. According to experts, it is estimated that approximately 20%-30% of that spending (approx. $800 billion a year) appears to go towards wasteful, redundant, or even inefficient care.
In sum, America needs to reevaluate the status quo surrounding medical care. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the current model only benefits a select few and causes insufferable costs for the rest of the world. If there is no reform for these issues, money will continue to be siphoned directly into the pockets of large, for-profit companies that benefit from the strife of
Discussion between the physician and the patient regarding treatment options and the risks and benefits of treatment.
The United States health care is structured badly. The insurance companies only look out for themselves; they think of ways they can save money not spend it. When you file for health insurance, companies will look through your application and medical records as if it were a murder investigation. They will try to find any flaw possible in your application just so they would not have to pay for your medical bill. The health insurance companies have an extremely long list of medical conditions you may have that they will deny you for. They will reject you if the surgery is considered experimental,...
The crisis centers around malpractice lawsuits. When patients can sue doctors and come away with unreasonable profits, doctors must invest great sums in insurance to cover these lawsuits; additionally, to avoid any claim of malpractice, they feel compelled to overanalyze routine ailments, often investing great sums of money to rule out rare afflictions (Studdert). The impact of these procedures spikes health care costs by as much as 30% (Kimbuende), putting affordable health care out of reach for many, while benefiting parties profiting from the excessive lawsuits. Tort reform aims to eliminate these extraneous costs th...
Lee, M. J. (2013). The patient protection and affordable care act: Better coverage, worse access. Will it really improve patient safety? The association of Bone and Joint Surgeon. Doi 10.1007/s11999-013-3315-x
Reforming the health care delivery system to progress the quality and value of care is indispensable to addressing the ever-increasing costs, poor quality, and increasing numbers of Americans without health insurance coverage. What is more, reforms should improve access to the right care at the right time in the right setting. They should keep people healthy and prevent common, preventable impediments of illnesses to the greatest extent possible. Thoughtfully assembled reforms would support greater access to health-improving care, in contrast to the current system, which encourages more tests, procedures, and treatments that are either
The pancreas is one of the essential organs in the human body and belongs in the Digestive system. Out of all the internal organs, the pancreas is unique because the pancreas plays a role in both the endocrine gland and the exocrine gland. This means that the pancreas is a dual function gland in which is the reason why the pancreas is such a vital part of the digestive system. This research paper will talk about the anatomy, physiology, and the important functions the pancreas play to maintain homeostasis.
As you consider treatment options that are available it’s important to keep in mind the following: