From Panopticon To Disneyland Analysis

448 Words1 Page

Shearing and Stenning's analysis in "From Panopticon to Disneyland” demonstrates Foucault's ideas concerning the disciplinary society. Foucault defined a disciplinary society as “A society characterized by increasing surveillance wherein citizens learn to constantly monitor themselves because they are being monitored. A society in which control over people is pervasive”. Shearing and Stenning’s article does this by illustrating to us how Disney goes about its day to day operations. An example is when exiting the parking lot to get on the monorail to go to the park the people on the train tell all guests to stay with their family for safety. However, this is really done to accomplish two things, one maintain family unity, and two to keep children with their parents so that if a child misbehaves the parents can discipline them instead of the park. “Thus, for example, the batching that keeps families together provides for family unity while at the same time ensuring that parents will be able to control their children” (Shearing and Stenning pg. 298). Foucault’s definition also states that control over people is pervasive or spread throughout. Disney’s way of controlling people is also pervasive, because every garden and fountain are not …show more content…

He focused on mass media and our consumption of it. That our reality is fluid and changing depending on the codes, signs, and the language in which we interpret them. One of his theories, hyper reality which is losing sense of what is really happening goes very well with Shearing and Stenning’s article. One of the main objectives of Disney in the article is to effectively manage the population of the park without them knowing or realizing. Baudrillard’s idea of hyper reality does just that. People visiting the park are so immersed by the characters, sights, and rides that they do not even realize they are being controlled through Disney reinforcing its ideas into

Open Document