Fresco Diego Rivera Analysis

691 Words2 Pages

Art movement’s characteristics vary from nation to nation, but painting can be used as a critique of the socio-political reality in a given nation. It is a creative way to communicate with a population about economic, education and social issues. Therefore, The History of Cuernavaca and Morelos: Crossing the Barranca (ravine) Detail (1929-30) Fresco by Diego Rivera is a good example of how an artist uses his creativity to connect with people in relation to Mexican history. Art is an inspired way to share the complexity and challenge of a community. It can be used a way to respond to them likewise. Therefore, the concept of accessibility takes ingenuity. With his deepen knowledge of European and ancient Mexican art, it was not a documentation …show more content…

The value of the word community is a social unit of any size that shares common values, or that is situated in a given geographical area, example in Mexico. The need of creating an official history of Mexico, which can be transmitted to the citizens, was the principle idea of the establishment of the Mexican art mural. It needed a medium that could reach a large amount of poor and illiterate public. It is a group of people who are connected by hard and durable situations that extend beyond through ancestral ties, and who usually define that relationship as important to their social identity and practice. The Mexican muralist began as a government-funded forms of public art—specifically, large-scale wall paintings in civic buildings—in the wake of the Mexican Revolution (1910–1920). The Revolution was a massive civil war helmed by a number of factions, which had very specific political and social agendas, to change the hopes and fears of the general population, and the transition of private to federal draining of lakes from villages. The communities may share intent, belief, resources, preferences, needs, and risks in common, affecting the identity of the participants and their degree of cohesiveness. After the Revolution, then, the government took on the very difficult project of transforming a divided Mexico into a coherent nation of Mexicans. Therefore, the public art …show more content…

At the age of 12, he joined the National School of Fine Arts of San Carlos in Europe, with a state scholarship. Upon his return, he exhibited his work in Mexico, and it was a largely successful. To escape the civil war in his country, Rivera travelled to Paris in 1911. The artist leaded a bohemian life between Spain and Paris. His works were exhibited at the Modern Gallery in New York, with particularly Picasso’s. In 1920, he returned to Mexico, where he completed his first mural. After delivering ‘ultra-intellectual’ experiments and embracing the people’s cause, Rivera returned from his studies to Mexico. He quickly evolved a simple language for the adornment of public buildings. Very soon, this style of creation, which included vibrant and vivid colors, becomes his trademark. He was a passionate artist who was devoted his art to civil wars and revolution. He also elaborated on US frescoes, he only worked with themes that he wanted to denounce and were dear to

Open Document