David Hume's View On Free Will

Introduction
Ever thought about who controls the decisions you make regarding your daily activities? You may think you control every aspect of your life, but some philosophers have questioned such notions. Many schools of thought explain the analogy of free will, and they present the argument of whether we have the freedom to act or other causes and effects determine our destiny. Free will in this context is defined as the freedom to choose and act where there several alternative courses of action. Theologically, the concept of free will is presented as the power to make decisions on our own without necessarily been influenced by external or predetermined courses.
Different theories define free will. Those who believe in compatibilism think
The first one is that actions that are moral are not differentiated from those that are not by the absence of a cause, but by a cause that is totally different. He argued that freedom and moral responsibility are reconcilable with determinism. The second proposition is that liberty where he retaliated that there is a distinction between necessity and of liberty and that our own will leads to free actions while external forces cause things that we experience against our will. On his part, liberty is freedom to act without influence and that a difference exists between free and unfree actions (Paul). According to him, free actions are caused by personal will while unfree actions are caused by external forces. He reasons that ideas of necessity and causation are more influenced by our experience and the resulting inferences we make. According to Hume, there are two classifications of liberty including spontaneity and indifference. The third proposition is that necessity defined as the constant concurrence of objects and inference of mind among the objects. He says that the debate on free will has to include the idea of necessity and that if two actions happen at the same time, then there is a relationship between the two occurrences. In this sense, he says that freedom requires a necessary link between an individual’s character and actions. Further, he says that human choice and action is concurrent and is regular and uniform. He points out that actions must follow a certain cause and that freedom cannot stand alone