Franklin D. Roosevelt's Economic Declaration Of Rights

1213 Words3 Pages

Economic Declaration of Rights Thinker: Franklin D. Roosevelt. The Economic Declaration of Rights is an economic constitutional order that declares a set of minimum rights that cannot be denied to man. Roosevelt continues stating that these basic rights need to be developed and protected by government and the business industry. Roosevelt states that men do not have to exercise these rights if they don’t choose to, but that these rights cannot be denied to men. He also expresses these rights as a “right to life”, “right to his own property”, “right to be assured”, and a right to the safety of his savings, which can be compared to the most common rights, “a comfortable living”. However, for Roosevelt the government and the business …show more content…

Marx also continues his thought of the exploitation by the new industries, since these industries exploit the soil and its raw material. He begins his thought of the exploitation of the laborer by the manufacturer, but not just by the manufacture. Marx states that after the worker receives his paying wage, he is exploited by the system they live in, “the political economy” and the bourgeoisie class, the landlord and the shopkeeper, etc. For Marx, the solution to exploitation is the abolition of bourgeois property or private property, which will cease class antagonisms. The reason bourgeois property is stated as private property, since Marx states that the wage laborer cannot acquire private property. He then states that capital is a social power and that this social power can be used to exploit laborers. Alienation Thinker: Karl Marx. Marx breaks down his theory to the origin of the basic functions of man and what alienation creates. Marx states that not only does the worker become alienated, but their self worth becomes degraded. “On the basis of political economy itself, in its …show more content…

Wollstonecraft believes that the teaching of “manners before morals” is not good for society, for either man or woman or for the family. Wollstonecraft states that manners are customary behaviors in a civilized society, but that morals are correct practiced behaviors. Wollstonecraft states that the belief of manners before morals corrupts and creates fakeness and causes morality to reduce. The education that is taught to women is to have an “outward obedience”, since women in their young age are told by their mothers that beauty, human weakness and obedience will land them a wealthy man. Wollstonecraft continues stating this type of education is based on manipulation, deceit and fakeness. Thus, marriages that are founded on this are immoral, based on lies and manipulation, which is continued throughout the marriage. Commodification Thinker: Michael Sandel. For Sandel, commodification is not good, since it can change an object, group or idea into a commodification and hence, does not promote civic duty, but can discourage it. We see that the market has got into public schools, universities, history, the environment and even sports. The integrity of a product or substance can be lost

Open Document