Frankenstein Knowledge Theme Essay

1569 Words4 Pages

Knowledge can be good or bad; it all depends on the person who wields it. This is a theme Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein proves throughout the story. Shelley uses literary devices such as characterization, tone, and irony in Frankenstein to teach readers that knowledge is benevolent in the hands of the selfless, but dangerous in the hands of the overly ambitious. Knowledge is a common theme portrayed throughout Frankenstein. The majority of the characters in the novel seek to wield information at some point, including Frankenstein, Monster, Elizabeth, Clerval, Walton, more minor characters like the judge and jury in Geneva, and many more. Throughout the novel, characters who attempt to obtain learning typically fall into one of two …show more content…

One of these is Henry Clerval, Frankenstein's best friend. In many ways, his character is a foil to characters like Frankenstein and Monster. He is focused on the, “moral relations of things” (Shelley 19). Clerval is further described as being “perfectly humane, so thoughtful in his generosity,” and full of, “kindness and tenderness” (Shelley 20). While Clerval still, “desired the intercourse of the men of genius and talent who flourished at this time,” he desired to use the knowledge he gained for the good of others, “assisting the progress of European colonisation and trade” (Shelley 114-115). Of course, Clerval still dies in the novel, but this is a result of the war between Frankenstein and his Monster, not as a result of Clerval's innocent pursuit of information. In fact, it is safe to infer that had Clerval not been Victor’s friend he might have prospered with his wisdom, which shows that a selfless attitude combined with the attainment of knowledge leads to good …show more content…

The number of characters who misuse their learning because they are ambitious far outweighs the number of kind people who use their learning to help others. The judge and jury of the trial of Justine, “had rather that ten innocent should suffer than that one guilty should escape” (Shelley 57). Due to this mindset, they go about obtaining information in entirely the wrong way. They assume she is guilty. So when they learn of the locket and how it was found to be in Justine’s possession, they condemned her without a further examination of Justine's character. They did not care that she was, “the most amiable and benevolent of human creatures” (Shelley 56). They only cared that their knowledge of the crime dictated she be found guilty. So they punished her with death without further remorse (Shelley 60). The desperate tone of this portion of the novel conveys just how obvious it was that Justine was innocent, and just how unjust it was for the jury to find her guilty when they only had a few pieces of observation rather than the entire picture. The judge and jury's desire to find Justine guilty ultimately led to their misuse of the knowledge they obtained, and disaster for everyone

Open Document