Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Grammer past tense
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Grammer past tense
Finite tenses are formed by changing the verb stem or by adding a suffix or prefix. There are two finite verb tenses:
1. present tense
2. simple past tense
Compound tenses
1. Future tense
2. Present perfect tense
3. Past Perfect tense
4. Future perfect tense
The Present Tense (Präsens)
In contrast with the several forms of the present tense in the English language, German present tense has only one form for all present tense usage:
Ich spreche I speak, I am speaking, I do speak du schreibst you write, you are writing, you do write wir lessen we read, we are reading, we do read er sieht he sees, he is seeing, he does see
In addition, the German present tense can be used to refer to an event that will happen in the future:
…show more content…
For example: boxen (to fight) du boxt reizen (to travel) du reizt heißen (to be called) du heißt bremsen (to apply the brake) du bremst
The Simple Past Tense (Präteritum/Imperfekt/Preterite)
There are two forms for the past tense in German: the Perfekt and the Präteritum. While both forms express past actions or events, the Perfekt form consists of two words and is more prevalent in informal speech. On the other hand, the Präteritum is the formal, written form of the past tense which is expressed through one-word verbs.
The simple past tense takes the second position in sentences except in yes-no questions where it is placed in the first position. Other verbal parts like complementary infinitives or separable verb prefixes take the last position in a sentence.
Er malte das Haus.
He painted the house.
Wurden sie informiert?
Were you informed?
Sie brachte ihr Kind mit.
She brought her child along.
Here is the conjugation table for the Preterite:
ich I -te du you -test er/sie/es he/she/it -te wir we -ten ihr you (plural)
…show more content…
Passive Voice
The active voice is the regular voice where the subject is the doer of the action. The object or receiver of the action is in the accusative case.
Example:
Sie reinigt das Haus jeden Tag. She cleans the house everyday.
In passive voice constructions, the object or receiver is the subject of the sentence. To form sentences in the passive voice, the conjugated form of the verb werden is used along with the past participle form of the main verb. The subject need not be stated in passive sentences but you may do so by using von+dative noun case. This is the counterpart of the English by (doer)
An example would be “Looking back at our history…” Since, it emphasizes the importance of our history. Antithesis was also used in the speech, which are opposing terms to help show differences between phases. For example, “We are divided, we are weak, we decline, yet when we are united, we are strong…” An allusion was obtained by stating the Declaration of Independence which shows the reference of history in our nation. Chiasmus is a verbal pattern when two clauses are balanced by reverse use of language. For instance, “If you want to go fast,go alone,but if you want to go far, go
Depending upon your definition of the present, it is hard to distinguish when the present time really is. Trying to pinpoint the exact time of “now” seems to be impossible because when we actually finish saying “now” it is already in the past. It is believed by many people that when a human dies for example, they cease to exist. In this essay I will be looking at two key concepts that relate to the topic of existence and the present time. These concepts are ‘Presentism’ and ‘Eternalism’. I will begin the essay by outlining what ‘Eternalism’ is and how its followers may see the present in a different way because of it. From here I will propose some of its weaknesses followed by objections to these weaknesses. The second main concept will be ‘Presentism’ which will be the opposing argument that suggests that things only exist in the present time instead of the past, present and future. After giving this argument, I will also be giving objections and counters to it. I, myself believe that there is a present time and existence, as we I find it difficult to believe that something exists in the same way once it has died and decomposed.
Active transport requires the use of energy because substances are moved against/up a concentration gradient or across a partially permeable membrane. On the other hand, passive transport moves molecules down the concentration gradient and does not require cellular energy. For example, osmosis which is the movement of water across the membrane would be considered a passive transport because the molecules, or in this case water move easy and freely.
One way which we speak, experience and conceive of time is that time is something that flows or passes from the future to the present and from the present to the past. When viewed in this way, events which are present have a special existential status. Whatever may be the case with regard to the reality or unreality of events in the future and the past, events that are in the present exist with a capital 'E'. It can then be postulated that it is the 'present' or 'now' that shifts to even later times. If events in time (or moments of time) are conceived in terms of past, present and future, or by means of the tenses, then they form what McTaggart called the A-series (from which the A-theory of time is derived). This type of change is commonly referred to as 'temporal becoming', and gives rise to well known perplexities concerning both what does the shifting and the type of shift involved, which we will discuss later.
An aduist is a person who exhibits attitudes of audism. There are two different types of audists. A passive audist is one who has not paid attention to their actions toward the deaf and hard of hearing. Their behavior can be a result of being uneducated about the differences between the hearing culture and the deaf culture. An active audist is informed of the differences, but they continue to engage in the audism behaviors. Their motivations are often from audist perceptions. They believe spoken language is higher than signed
-story is set in the present tense, however it often switches to past tense in flashbacks Offred has of her old life
Strunk and White start their style guide off by reminding us of the rules of word order and punctuation. Rules that include: “Enclose parenthetic expressions between commas” and “The number of the subject determines the number of the verb”(2,9). These rules are not optional if you want others to understand what you are writing and your purpose for writing it.
...ter may use several words that can be grouped together into one word. An example of this would be :
5.) Linear time - is a record of events in sequence from past to the present.
Ross, Steven M. ""Voice" in Narrative Texts: The Example of As I Lay Dying." PMLA94.2 (1979): 300-10. JSTOR. Web. 23 Mar. 2014.
In each sentence, change the plural subjects to singular ones; then make any necessary changes in the verbs. (2 points each)
The ‘Thank Goodness That’s Over’ argument by Arthur Prior (1959), illustrates that our language fundamentally uses tenses, and not ‘space-time’ tenseless talk. In this essay I shall explain prior’s argument, along with a potential critique for it.
Standard English uses a conjugated verb called a copula (to be, to have) in a number of different sentences. In AAVE this verb is often not included. Here are some examples:
An important linguistic change was also in syntax. Syntax governs the structure of a sentence, as well as the structure of verbs. Auxiliary verbs came into use, for example the use of do and have which extended the capability of expression for verbs. The subtle differences between I walk, I do walk, and I am walking are not available in many other languages. This improvement assisted English in differentiating itself from other languages.
In the second premises, he states that the past and future don’t exist. Presentism states that only the present exists and that the past and the future doesn’t exist, which supports Grey’s second premises. However saying that the past doesn’t exist is like rejecting the fact that Muhammad Ali is the greatest boxer or the fact that Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player. In common sense would suggest that they do exist, but according to presentism, it states that they don’t exist. How can the past not exist when past-tense sentences like “Nixon was the president of the 20th century” or “Abraham Lincoln stopped slavery” exists?