Flame Test Lab Report

589 Words2 Pages

Andrea Bouchan* Meredith TA: Felicia Konopka September 20, 2015 Results and Discussion The purpose of this experiment was to use qualitative analysis methods to identify the metal nitrate salts that were present in an unknown solution for parts A and B. In part C, a third method, the cation flame tests, was used to identify cation solutions based on the color that was emitted by the flame. In parts A and B, the results were the presence of the lead cation and the barium cation. Lead was identified in part a during step six when the solution turned cloudy and very yellow, indicating the presence of a lead precipitate. During part B, step 13, the solution turned foggy and yellow then settled into a white precipitate, indicating the presence of barium. These results were reasonable. The unknown solution was number 4. During part C, the BaCl2 solution emitted a yellow color when it was placed into the bunsen burner flame. KCl was lavender, NaCl was orange, CaCl2 was also orange, LiCl was magenta, and CuCl2 was green. These results were also expected and coincide well with the given cation flame color table. …show more content…

This made it easier to separate the given cation from the rest of the solution because cations have a positive charge and are inherently attracted to an anion’s negative charge. During step 5, the sample was heated because it acts as a catalyst that forces the molecules to move faster, fostering a chemical reaction. K2CrO4 was added in step 12 because the CrO4 is negatively charged and would bond either with the Ba cation or with the Ca cation. In step 12, the possible false positive refers to the solution seeming to have the barium cation because the solution was not fully dissolved and could resemble one that has a

Open Document