Third Wave Feminism: Equality or Exclusion?

1253 Words3 Pages

Since the late 19th century, the feminist movements have taken great strides towards gender equality. The struggles of first and second wave feminism have provided Western white women with the ability to vote, as well as the ability to venture outside the private realm into culture, politics and the workforce. These freedoms gained by these movements have reached a point where many young women today believe that equality has been achieved and feminism is no longer needed. This essay will discuss how third wave feminists are believed to be undoing the efforts of the mothers of feminism and how, although freer than women of the past, the extensive freedoms afforded to women today does not equal gender equality, as they are still limited and exclusionary. …show more content…

As Ortner states, it was a woman’s place closer to nature than men that left her “doomed to the reproduction of life” (1996, 29). At the forefront of first wave feminism was the move to challenge these roles and provide a space for women in the social and political spaces of the public sphere. They openly rallied against the essentialist idea that domesticity was natural to femininity and that presence in public spaces was designed for only men who, unlike women, were the “natural proprietors of religion, ritual, politics, and other realms of cultural thought” (Ortner 1996, 33). This push for female equality made Australia the second country in the world to provide women the right to vote (however, this is with the notable exception of indigenous women, which will be examined further on). In the late 1960s, second wave feminism continued where first wave feminism had left off. They focused primarily on sexuality, the work place, reproductive rights, and the liberation from the essentialist gender roles that had resulted in “a totalising symbolic system [that subjugated] all women” (Fuss 1989, 2). Second wave feminism saw the separation of sex and gender, and they further challenged the idea that gender roles were “essentially unchangeable and predictable” (Fuss 1989, 3). Due to feminist advocacy in the late 1970s and early 1980s, Australian states began passing bill …show more content…

That young women in Australia today are freer than both their mothers and grandmothers were and that inequality is solved. However, while responsibility for the domestic sphere is no longer “widely understood as imposed on women” (Baker 2012, 341), the mark of a successful woman is the ability to balance both domestic duties with a successful work life. The efforts against feminine essentialism and liberation from the domestic sphere undertaken by first and second wave feminists have been sidelined. Thought to have been fulfilled, this domestic essentialism interrogated by Fuss (1989) and Ortner (1996) have appeared in the expectation for women to be successful both the public and the private sphere. Young women must demonstrate that they are making good of the opportunities afforded to them. The compromise for occupying a space in the labour market is that women “must retain a visible fragility, and [display] the kind of conventional feminine vulnerability that will ensure she remains desirable to men” (McRobbie 2009, 79). Here, conventional femininity can be exchanged for essential femininity, as many women still believe it to be their responsibility to manage and maintain the domestic sphere (Walters and Whitehouse 2012, 1118). Despite feminist challenges, this essentialist belief has continued in subtler ways. Through research done by Walters and Whitehouse, it is

Open Document