Federation Square Project: ABC TV Documentaries Australian Broadcasting Corporation

850 Words2 Pages

- Resource 1006 - Case Study: Federation Square Project. Commissioned 01 May 2003 by ABC TV Documentaries Australian Broadcasting Corporation GPO Box 9994 Brett Salathiel z5077339 15 March 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................1 2 Project Scope Management.................................................................................1 3. Project Cost Management…………………………………………………………..1 4. Project Time Management…………………………………………………………2 5. Project Quality Management………………………………………………………2 5.1 Stone works……………………………………………………………………….2 6. Conclusion.................................................................................................................3 …show more content…

The series of events as shown in the ABC documentary with the application of PMBOK in complex projects will be evaluated in the following report. The Federation Square project was launched in March 1996 then embarked in 1998 and was opened in October 2002, two years behind schedule however with all manufacturing still not complete (Vic Auditor-General 2003) requiring considerable post-completion maintenance and support and further wasting of valuable resources. This was the culmination of six years hard work coupled with two different political parties and involved thousands of contract personal costing $473.3million (Report on Public Sector Agencies, May 2003 2.232). As well as been constantly besieged with issues and heavy criticism from the general public the project is an example of the major problems that can impede a project that is outside the total control of the project …show more content…

Project Time Management As displayed in appendix 2, the amount of unplanned/poorly planned events which occurred during the construction of Federation Square 5. Project Quality Management From the very beginning The Federation Square project had a clear goal of prioritizing the quality of the end result, but along the way the quality is compromised little by little. As Dimity Reed architecture writer & critic commented: “The architect’s role and their intellectual responsibility is to fight to maintain their vision and little bits get chopped off all the time, but if they’re only little bits, it’s not too bad.’’ With an artificial end date in place the shift in priority from quality to time changes giving the end result a lesser out come as to what could have been achieved. This is yet another trade off that was incurred as the maintenance after the official opening date still needed to be completed costing the tax payers what seemed like a never ending cost (Refer 5.1). 5.1 Stone works 6. Conclusion The main lesson from Federation Square is that project definition and planning processes must be improved, particularly for large-scale, complex ‘icon’ projects. Prestige projects such as Federation Square have the capacity to create lingering major controversy and to become a sinkhole for taxpayers' funds and maybe the government of the

Open Document