Family Law Act 1975

759 Words2 Pages

The Family Law Act 1975 was introduced into law to deal with the breakdown of a marriage. Since the introduction of this act there have been a number of significant changes moving away from just dealing with the breakdown of the relationship to managing the family as a whole unit and how it (the breakdown of the relationship) has an impact on the family. As a result of these changes there have been a number of Father’s Rights Groups that have been growing rapidly in response to the family law system. They claim that the family law system is biased towards mothers being the primary carers and decision makers in a child’s life. However, The Family Law Amendment (Shared Responsibility) Act 2006, was since altered and enforced with the intent of …show more content…

The way the best interests of the child is determined is by ensuring that all decisions protect them from any harm and ensures the child has a meaningful relationship with both parents.

Dads in Distress and Men’s Rights Agency are among the groups that grew out of disconnect with the family law system. The organisations aim to support men who are going through separation from their partners and ultimately from their children. They perceive the family law system as corrupt as they rarely get custody or meaningful time with their children as mothers are predominately deemed the primary caregivers and decision makers in all issues relating to the child.

This is evident in the news article entitled Are family law courts biased against men? As Mr Kilmartin, a family lawyer confirms this. He states that “the family law system is very female-focussed and, frankly, unbalanced,”. In addition, he states that he has had countless male clients who feel as though they are depicted as the bad guy in the separation/shared-parenting process, and feel as though there is definitely an imbalance in family law proceedings, which support the claims of the men. Furthermore, Mr Kilmartin states that he is aware of the preconceived attitudes against males during divorce and custody negotiations and the “child attachment theory” which says that children prefer to be with their mothers as opposed to their fathers, which courts agree …show more content…

This shared parental responsibility is the presumption that both the mother and the father of the child have a role in making decisions about important long-term issues concerning the child. These are issues relating to school or major health concerns.
In addition, they would argue that the amendment provides flexible options that assist you after the breakdown of the relationship like parenting plans. A parenting plan is an agreement that is done by both parents of the child, which highlights the arrangements of the child, this plan is made without the involvement of the court. The amendment, however, provides yet another option if you and your partner cannot come to a consensus or you still believe that the system is unfair you can apply for a parenting order. These parenting orders are issued by the court and they set out arrangements for the

Open Document